Stalin’s Rise to Power Flashcards
1 How had
Lenin caused
a power
vacuum?
- Decisions were supposedly made
collectively but in practice Lenin had
dominated - His leadership was based on his
personality and his authority. - Instead of encouraging democracy, he
introduced the ban on factions in 1921 - He had had created a huge
bureaucracy carrying out orders from
superiors.
How had a
power
struggle
started
before
Lenin’s
death?
- Lenin had become unwell towards the
end of 1921, and in May 1922 he had
the first of a series of strokes - By mid-1923 it was obvious that Lenin
would never return to government. - When Lenin died, there was no
obvious successor. - A collective leadership was therefore
established to govern Russia.
What
happened
when Lenin
died?
- Lenin’s coffin was displayed in Red
Square and crowds of people queued
to pay their respects. - The Politburo preserved his body in a
mausoleum in Red Square
How did a
cult of
personality
form?
- Petrograd was renamed Leningrad,
- Lenin’s statue was built in every
Russian city - Children were named after the
Communist leader.
What should
have
happened
with
leadership?
- Marxism suggested that power should
be shared in a collective leadership - The Politburo had emerged as the
most powerful part of the
Government. - Therefore, gaining a majority on the
Politburo was the key to power - From 1922 to 1929, a relentless
struggle for supremacy was waged by
Politburo leaders
What was Lenin’s testament?
- Lenin’s Testament was written a year before his death in 1924.
- The notes were addressed to the Central Committee and were
highly critical of the main contenders for power
What did Lenin’s testament say?
- Accused Trotsky of arrogance and being too willing to use
violence - Accused Stalin of impatience and rudeness
- That Zinoviev and Kamenev had been disloyal to the party
immediately before the October Revolution - That Bukharin did not fully understand Lenin’s ideology.
What happened
to the
testament?
- Lenin’s widow Krupskaya handed the testament to the
Politburo - It was supposed to be published in the Party Congress in May
1924. - Key members of the Central Committee declined to read it
out.
Trotsky
- Recognised as a hero from the October
Revolution and Civil War - Inspirational speaker and intellectual
- Known for his political skills and organisational
ability - Known to be arrogant and dismissive of those
who were not as intellectual as him - He failed to build a power base of followers
Zinoviev
- Lenin had once called him his ‘closest and most
trusted assistant’ - Strong power base in Leningrad
- One of the best speechmakers with a
commanding presence - Had opposed Lenin in organising the October
Revolution - Vain and prone to mood swings also
underestimated Stalin
Kamenev
- Had helped form Party policy and was close to
Lenin - Had a strong power base in Moscow
- Effective at reaching compromises between
people. - Opposed to Lenin’s April Theses in 1917 and his
desire to work for a revolution in October 1917. - Seen as lacking ambition on his own
- Underestimated his opponents
Bukharin
- Popular in the party, close to Lenin and Trotsky
- Widely regarded as the best theoretician in the Party
- An expert on economics and agriculture
- He had no party base and wanted to avoid fighting
- His popularity made him a target
- Underestimated Stalin
Tomsky
- Had a long history of fighting for the Bolsheviks,
which meant he was widely respected - Strong base of support from being General Secretary
of trade unions - Hatred of Trotsky blinded him to the threat of Stalin
- His power base in the trade unions made him a clear
target for Stalin
Rykov
- Had a long history of fighting for the Bolsheviks,
which meant he was widely respected - Good administrator – he had helped implement war
communism and the NEP - Supported by the Sovnarkom
- His policy of heavy taxation on vodka was very
unpopular - Opposed Lenin over the timing of the revolution
- Lacked a power base, too moderate
Stalin
- He could claim to be a true the very
beginning, in 1903, and had been loyal to
Lenin through the whole period from 1903 to
1921. - His role as General Secretary meant he could
appoint supporters to key roles in the party. - He had fallen out of favour with Lenin prior to
his death. - Colleagues saw him as ill-educated, rude and
crude. Lenin had criticised him in the
Testament
How was Stalin
in a good
position?
- Stalin held key positions within the
Communist Party. - In 1919, Stalin was made head of the Orgburo
- In 1922 he became Secretary-General, which
put him in charge of the party organisation. - These positions gave Stalin the opportunity
to appoint lower and middle ranks of the
party and gave him significant powers of
patronage
How did Stalin
consolidate his
position?
- In 1924, Stalin initiated the Lenin Enrolment.
- From May 1924, this enrolment drive allowed
128,000 people to join the Communist Party. - Stalin justified this by arguing that the party
needed new working-class members. - Because they were interested in getting well
paid party jobs they tended to support Stalin,
who was able to promote them within the
party.
Why
was the NEP
an
issue?
- The NEP was criticised for not conforming to
communist principles - Lenin had insisted it was a ‘temporary measure’ to
help Russia recover from the Russian Civil War, so
the was divided on how long they should continue
with the policy. - By 1925, NEP was causing industrial and agricultural
concerns as workers’ standards of living declined and
peasants were hoarding grain rather than selling it. - Also Marxism taught that only an industrialised
economy could make a socialist society work.
What
did the
Left
want?
To abandon the NEP in favour of state controlled,
rapid industrialisation funded by ‘squeezing the
peasants’
What
did the
Right
want?
- To continue with the NEP with the peasants
becoming richer. - The state would then use the taxes to fund gradual
industrialisation
What
did
Stalin
want?
- Inconsistent attitude.
- Initially opposed the Left when trying to defeat them,
but turned on the NEP once the Left had been
eliminated.
Why
was - ‘Permanent revolution’ or ‘Socialism in
One Country’
an
issue?
- All theories of Marxism-Leninism had assumed it was
impossible for revolution to survive in a single country
against all the capitalist countries - But Marxist theory was contradicted by real-world
events - Revolutions in Germany and Hungary were crushed
- Defeat in the Russo-Polish War blocked the Revolution
from extending West - The USSR were the only communist country
What
did the
Left
believe about ‘Permanent revolution’ or ‘Socialism in
One Country’?
- All theories of Marxism-Leninism had assumed it was
impossible for revolution to survive in a single country
against all the capitalist countries - But Marxist theory was contradicted by real-world
events - Revolutions in Germany and Hungary were crushed
- Defeat in the Russo-Polish War blocked the Revolution
from extending West - The USSR were the only communist country
What
did the
Right
believe about ‘Permanent revolution’ or ‘Socialism in
One Country’?
- Believed in the theory of Socialism in One Country.
- Thought a world revolution was unlikely
- Aimed to strengthen the USSR as a workers’ state could
be created to rival the capitalist powers.
What
did
Stalin
believe?
- Supported Socialism in One Country in 1924.
- It appealed to Russian patriotism, portraying Trotsky’s
ideas as out of touch
Outcome of the power struggle - Stalin
By December 1929, Stalin secure as leader of the Soviet
Union due to his strong base of supporters and political
manoeuvring
Outcome of the power struggle - The left
- After they were expelled in 1927, Kamenev and
Zinoviev criticised their past actions and were allowed
to re-join the party in 1928. - Trotsky refused to do this and was exiled. He moved
around until, in 1940, he was murdered in Mexico on
Stalin’s orders