Staff: The Chalkengr Of Professionalism Flashcards
Profession
An occupation based on specified knowledge and training and regulated standards of performance.
Professionalization
A process whereby an occupation achieves the more independent status of a profession.
Privileged status of a profession
The combination of these factors produces the privileged status of professions in society. Their status relative to other occupations can be assessed by:
• wealth – higher income, as a result of a better position in the marketplace
• prestige – the esteem in which the group is held by others
•power – the ability to influence decisions and other occupations in the field.
Medical profession
Historically, the rise of the medical profession was related to achieving a legal and ideological monopoly. Factors facilitating this process include the scientific background of medical knowledge and organized education.
Professional power
As you have seen, Professional power is based on: • technical expertise • authority • Clientele • uncertainty • relationship to other professions
1 What reasons are given as to why nursing has difficulties in developing as a profession?
1 The text gives a variety of reasons for differences in professional development between doctors and nurses, for example:
• lack of independence – nurses are more bound by hierarchy and quasi-military discipline
• lack of autonomy in clinical judgement
• lack of own scientific knowledge and language
• lack of solidarity and syndicalist mode of interest representation
• lack of influence on decision making. Note also that many of the problems are related to the traditional gender role of women in society: nursing is often viewed as women’s work and seen as a domestic service which does not require expert knowledge
2What is the professional status of nurses in your country?
2 The status of nursing varies internationally and so do requirements for training, career prospects and payment levels relative to doctors. Different curricula and job entry requirements may even exist within a country between ambulatory care and hospitals. The nurse–doctor ratio varies widely (see Chapter 17) and this is, to some extent, also a reflection of the professional status of nurses. Academically trained nurses are more prevalent in the English-speaking world and in Nordic countries. Strengthening nursing education and professional development is high on the agenda of many countries. Where independent nurse practitioners have been introduced, this has often been seen as a challenge to the medical profession.
make notes on the following issues: 1 The contrasting ways in which India, China and what is referred to as the Third World model have sought to integrate western and traditional, indigenous medical systems.
1 India recognized more than one medical system. Practitioners of all systems were at liberty to practise and form professional associations. This was partly driven by social reality and partly a response to nationalist feelings. Professions were encouraged to develop self-regulation. In China, the Maoist state actively sought to integrate traditional medicine with western medicine. Barefoot doctors were trained not only in western medicine but also in acupuncture, herbal therapy and other systems. Hospitals made use of all available systems. The Third World model accepts its inability to control the various local practitioners due to the lack of a strong system of western medicine and, therefore, people’s dependence on indigenous systems
Make notes on: 2The source of legitimacy of practitioners.
2 Legitimacy of practitioners and medical systems is derived from the local community’s own traditions or the personal charisma of practitioners. This is essentially a pragmatic, experiential approach rather than one based on political philosophy.
Parsons model
Talcott Parsons (1902–79), in 1939. His functionalist view welcomed the notion of professions, seeing the legitimation of professional status as a means of protecting patients from harm. Patients accept the authority of doctors. They trust doctors and expect them to have the highest competence. Therefore knowledge and skills need to be guaranteed by educational standards. To protect the intimate relationship between doctors and patients, the profession needs to be granted an autonomous status, independent from state interference. Professionalism is thought to allow a more flexible response to patients’ needs than tightly controlled health services. As only doctors can judge their peers, they need to have the right to discipline members who violate the code of conduct. Thus professionalism plays a beneficial role by serving both the needs of the individual and of society.
Marxist model
In contrast, there have been several critiques that challenge Parsons’ view. In the Marxist view, professions are considered a middle-class privilege, mystifying and stabilizing the power of the ruling class. This was seen as part of a wider struggle between classes for economic, social and political advantages, a struggle that was limited by the mode of production.
Freidson
An alternative critique propounded by Elliot Freidson in 1974 emphasized the role of self-interest in the formation of professions. To him, professionalization is similar to trade unionism, a way of increasing the rewards for labour. Doctors have been particularly successful in eliminating their competitors and creating a monopoly. They have managed to keep remuneration high through market closure. And in due course, they have managed to convey the image that only members of the profession can provide services properly. In this view, professionalism is beneficial only at the expense of other occupations and to members who pursue their own interests. This view partly echoed the concerns of the liberal Irish playwright, George Bernard Shaw, in 1911 who suggested that ‘All professions are conspiracies against the laity.’
Illich
More recently, the Austrian theologian Ivan Illich (1974) criticized professionalism as a way of colonizing other sectors of social life (medical imperialism) and disguising the fact that doctors produce ill health (iatrogenesis). In his view, professionalism does more harm than good. Doctors don’t just provide health services but attempt to take control over other aspects of life. Examples of medical expansion include the medicalization of childbirth, disabilities, problems of ageing and death. An increasing number of social problems have been handed over to the medical profession, thereby extending its authority to define what is good or wrong and barring other professions and lay people from dealing with health problems. Medical expansion is seen as a threat as it weakens individual abilities to cope with illness and hides away pain and death, which are natural parts of life.
1 Write down four key arguments in favour of and four against independent status of doctors.
For Trust Defence of individual Peer control Flexibility
Against Middle class monopoly Medical expansion Dominated by self-interest Lack of accountability
2 Contrast briefly the different views and compare them with your own experience in health services.
2 Though medical expansion has clearly occurred, Illich’s generalizing view of the role of experts has been criticized as exaggerated and misleading (Strong 1979). On the other hand, the functionalist view, which had developed among the early writers, appears to be naive in not taking account of the self-interest of the medical profession. Friedson’s view has incorporated the aspect of self-interest and given an explanation of professional power, which has been widely acknowledged.