Stable carbenes and carbene analogues of the p-block elements (i.e. low oxidation state chemistry) Flashcards
Inert pair effect
Arises from increasing s-p separation as you go down the group due to the increased penetration of the ns orbital over the np orbital
s electrons stabilised by increasing nuclear charge
Also orbitals become more diffuse down the group so bonds get weaker - the energy released from bonding needs to be enough to be able to utilise the low-lying s electrons
Carbenes
Neutral compounds featuring a divalent carbon with only 6 electrons in its valence shell
i.e. R2C:
Carbene geometry
Triplet carbenes can be either linear or bent (singlet always bent)
Linear = sp hybrid i.e. bonds to substituents are formed using sp orbitals
Bent = sp2 hybrid i.e. bonds to substituents are formed using sp2 orbitals
Triplet carbene
Spins paired (electrons in different orbitals)
Singlet carbene
Opposite spins (electrons in the same sp2 orbital, diamagnetic) Higher energy than triplet
Why are bent triplet carbenes more stable than linear triplet carbenes?
Draw MO diagram
When does a singlet ‘carbene’ become the ground state rather than a triplet?
If the 3a1-1b1 (i.e. HOMO-LUMO) separation is > 2 eV (45 kcal mol-1)
Difference between the ground states of carbenes and group 14 metallylenes
The increasing s-p separation down the group leads to increasing stability of the singlet state down the group
This is a result of the inert pair effect - electrons want to remain paired up in the low energy orbitals of high s character
DeltaE(ST) for H2M (M = group 14 element)
= E(triplet) - E(singlet) C -14 Si +16.7 Ge +21.8 Sn +24.8 Pb +34.8
Why does Et2Sn exist as a hexamer rather than a monomer?
Sn-Sn single bonds are sufficiently strong to allow the valence 5s2 electrons in tin to rehybridise to form bonds
(Et2Sn)6 is the thermodynamically favoured product of the reaction
How can isolation of monomeric dialkyl tin compounds be favoured?
Through the introduction of steric bulk around the tin (i.e. altering the kinetics of the reaction)
Using a bulky R group will introduce kinetic protection around the tin centre and therefore result in a higher barrier towards condensation of the monomer units
i.e. will stabilise the low oxidation state
Examples of common bulky ligands than can provide kinetic stabilisation
Draw
Remember ‘amide’ ligands are 1 electron donors (ie. NH2/NR2)
How to rationalise the singlet ground state of heavier group 14 metallylenes
Can’t just simply rationalise using the inert pair effect - because the s orbitals are involved in bonding with the substituents (lowest energy bonding orbital - 2a1 orbital)
Rationalise instead through mixing of the a1 orbitals (second order Jahn-Teller effect)
The sigma* orbital reduces in energy down group 14 because the bonding gets weaker (i.e. smaller sigma/sigma* gap)
This reduction in energy leads to mixing of the HOMO (3a1) and the sigma* orbital (4a1) because they are of the same symmetry
This increases the s-character of the HOMO (because the sigma* orbital is the antibonding combination of s orbitals)
Therefore the HOMO becomes lower in energy (increasing HOMO/LUMO gap)
This mixing effect increases down the group as orbitals get more diffuse and bonds get weaker
How can the HOMO/LUMO gap be narrowed?
By increasing the angle between the substituents (e.g. by using bulky substituents)
i.e. moving away from bent back towards linear
The overlap of orbitals in 3a1 (HOMO) becomes less efficient, increasing the HOMO energy and narrowing the HOMO/LUMO gap
Get a red-shifted absorption (longer wavelength/lower energy absorption)
Inductive effects on HOMO/LUMO gap
The 3a1 HOMO can be stabilised by using ligands with electronegative substituents e.g. O, N
Therefore increasing HOMO/LUMO gap and stabilising singlet state over highly reactive triplet state