Sports Management Flashcards
Organizational Theory
Organisational theory is a discipline that helps us to understand why sports organisations are structured and operated in different ways. It helps us to understand why large sports organisations have different structures than small ones; while sport manufacturing organisations operate in a different way from those in the service sector; and why voluntary sport organisations may pursue different strategies from those that are designed to make a profit.
Organisation theory also helps to understand how processes such as change and decision making can be managed. In sport, organisation theory can make us better managers by providing an understanding of the way sports organisations are structured and operated. One of the key factors that influence the effectiveness of the sport organisation is whether it has an appropriate structure and design.
Effectiveness in Sport Organisation (Goal Attainment, System Resource)
All organisation exist to achieve a goal or a set of goals. It may be pursuing a national championship, making a profit or developing young cultures. The ultimate goal of most professional sport organisations is to win a major championship in their sport; yet each season only one team can achieve this goal.
Four Approaches to Effectiveness in Sport Organisation:
1. Goal Attainment
2. System Resource
3. Internal Process
4. Strategic Constituency
Goal Attainment (Organisational Output):
The approach is based on the dentification of primary goals and hoe well an organisation attains and makes progress toward them. An organisation that achieves its goals is seen as being more effective than one that does not. It is this approach that has been used most extensively in evaluating the effectiveness of sport organisation. For this approach to be workable there must be a conscience among members of the organisation of the goal to be pursued. Also there must be a small enough number of goals to be manageable. Despite its simplicity and the ease it is to implement measures of organisational effectiveness, the goal attainment approach is in a number of ways problematic. First in any sport organisation there are often multiple and conflicting goals being pursued. A second problem concerns the vagueness of a sports organisation’s goals. Finally, there is a problem of which goals take within a sport and whether the sport organisation should focus on long or short term priorities.
System Resource (Organisational Input):
Rather than focusing on organisational output as the goal attainment approach does, the systems resource approach to organisational effectiveness focuses on input of an organisation, specifically its ability to attract scarce or valued resources. These resources may include members, the fans attending a game or the income generated from sales from licensed merchandise. Although secure resources are vital to the survival of sport organisation and survival is the overriding measure of effectiveness there are several problems with the system resource approach.
Effectiveness in Sport Organisation (Internal Process Approach, Strategic Constituency Approach)
Internal Process Approach:
As opposed to the inputs and outputs the internal process approach focuses on throughputs, the internal activities by which inputs are converted into outputs. Indicators of effectiveness can include such things as a supervisor’s concern for his or her co-workers, feelings of group loyalty, good communication, and the personal development of subordinates (Daf 1992). Some writers propose that the internal process approach should focus on fiscal efficiency (Evans 1976). Here measures such as inventory turnover and changes in sale volume are used as the criteria for assessing effectiveness. Although the internal process is useful in comparing organisational with different outputs it does have its shortcomings. First it is often difficult to quantifiably measure criteria such as group loyalty or good communication, which from this perspective are indicators of good performance. Secondly this approach takes no account of the notation of the equifinality, the means by which two organisations with different internal processes could be equally effective in reading the same goal.
As a result, the organisation’s general manager has to work towards a compromise to ensure the future effectiveness of the organisation. A major strength of strategic constituency approach is that it acknowledges that effectiveness is a complex and multi-dimensional concept that is affected by pressures.
Strategic Constituency Approach:
Strategic constituency model (Conley Et Al 1990) is a more current means of understanding organisation effectiveness; it provides an integrative approach that takes into account the political nature of an organisation. It also acknowledges the fact that organisations consist of a number of constituents which often have different priorities and goals. In a professional sport organisation owners have different goals from players. As a result, the organisation’s general manager has to work out a compromise to ensure the future effectiveness of the organisation. A major strength of constituency approach is that it acknowledges that effectiveness is a complex and multi-dimensional concept that is affected by pressures both internal and external to the organisation. As a result it takes into account the political nature of organisations and the fact that managers have to consider all groups that have an interest in the organisation.
The Structure of Sports Organisations
To be effective a sport organisation must be structured to respond to the contextual situations in which it operates. Consequently, an understanding of the different elements of structure is one of the basic tenets of organisational theory. The structure of an organisation is important because it influences the flow of information and affects collaboration, modes of coordination, allocations of power and responsibility and levels of formality (Miller 1987)
The three main dimensions of organisational structure are:
1. Complexity
2. Formalisation
3. Centralisation
Complexity
This refers to the extent to which an organisation is differentiated. Meaning the way in which the organisation is divided into different divisions, departments. or individual roles; each with its own tasks and responsibilities. This differentiation may occur horizontally, spatially or vertically.
Horizontal Differentiation-
this occurs as a result of the different parts of the organisation becoming specialised into different activities. This specialisation is carried out in an attempt to increase efficiency and can occur in 2 ways. First the total work to be performed in the organisation may be divided into sperate, discrete and narrow tasks. Second the employment if specialists to perform a myriad of organisational activities and result in diversity trained individuals bringing different roles, approaches and terminology. This can present communication and coordination problems which can in turn increase complexity.
Vertical Differentiation- refers to the number of hierarchical levels in the sport organisations. The more levels that are the greater the chance for problems of communication, coordination and supervision, hence the more complex the organisation. Vertical differentiation is often directly proportional to the size of the organisation and also to the degree of horizontal differentiation. When a job is highly specialised it is difficult for the worker to relate his or her work to that of others so control of the work is often passed to the manager. This has the effect of increasing the number of vertical levels in the organisation. The number of workers that a manager can supervise is referred to as span of control.
Spatial Differentiation- refers to the degree of geographical separation of the various divisions of the same organisation. Thus an organisation based entirely on one site such as a single outlet sports shop has a very low degree of spatial differentiation. On the other hand large oganisations such a the NFL can be considered highly spatial because its franchises are widely distributed throughout the USA. In addition the NFL has part ownership of the European based world league of American Football, this makes the NFL operation a lot more difficult to coordinate and much more complex than a sports goods shop.
The more horizontally, vertically and spatially differentiated an organization is, the more complex it becomes. Increased complexity results in an organisation in which coordination and communication are more difficult and management more demanding.
Formalisation
One of the ways of managing complexity is through the use of formalisation. Formalisation refers to the extent to which rules, regulations, job descriptions, policies and procedures govern the operation of the organisation. In a highly formalised organisation such as one that uses production line technique to manufacture goods or equipment, employees will have little discretion or discussion over how and when they carry out their tasks. The head coach of a WNBA team will by contrast find his or her job less formalised, with the freedom to set day to day activities.
Formalisation may not vary just among organisations but also among departments and hierarchical levels in the same organisation. Example: Adidas research and development department will operate under a less formalised conditions than its manufacturing plant. This is a direct result of the research and development department employing highly trained professionals which require a greater degree of flexibility in their modus operandi than do the less skilled production worker. Likewise, because of their need to operate quickly and in the best interest of the entire organisation senior managers are usually subjected to less formalisation than lower level managers. Formalisation allows strict workers control without the necessity of expensive close supervision. It also permits the standardisation of outputs allowing items such as athletic shoes to be designed on one continent, manufactured on another and sold in a third.
Centralisation
This refers to the hierarchical level at which decisions are made in centralised organisations decisions tend to be made at the upper level of management n more decentralised organisations similar decisions will be delegated to a lower hierarchical level. As an organisation grows it quickly reaches a point whereby it becomes impossible for a single person to make decisions it would take a very long time to make minor decisions. Consequently decisions that are regarded as less crucial are delegated to lower levels, allowing senior management to concentrate on strategic decisions affecting the organisation.
Organisations that are highly decentralised are often highly formalised. This allows decisions to be made quickly while maintaining top management control of the organisation. This brings into questions exactly how decentralised such organisations are because even thought decisions are made at the lower levels the range of choice in decision making is controlled at the upper level.
Organisations
The term organisation has been defined as systems of consciously coordinated activities or forces of two or more persons (Vernard 1938). However many different definitions have evolved since then. While the definitions defer they share 5 common features:
1. A collection of individuals and groups
2. Goal orientation
3. Deliberate Structure
4. Deliberate Coordination
5. Identifiable Boundaries
Sport Organisations
Sport Organisations:
A deliberatly structured and coordinated system of individuals and groups with special skills and talents in the sport industry working together to achieve a common set of goals. This definition implies that organisations in the sport industry are comprised of people working together in formal groups to accomplish the goals and objectives of the organisation in the most effective and efficient manner.
Sport Organisations are Deliberately Structured:
Sport organisations need a logical and systematic arrangement of people and resources. Divisions and departments in any organisation are not hastily formulated but carefully determined and coordinated in order to construct an effective and efficient organisation. Sport organisations are deliberately coordinated. This feature implies that the work among the individuals and groups in sport organisations must be coordinated in a pattern relationship.
Sport Organisations Exists as a System of Individuals and Groups:
Organisations in the sport industry do not operate without the human element. Individuals and Grous of people with special skills are the lifeblood of these organisations. Human resources are needed to activate the non-human resources. If we took away the interaction among the individuals and groups the program would have no blood.
Sport Organisations are made up of People with Special Skills:
Sports organisations exist for a reason. Thus feature implies that individuals and groups are selected because they bring special skills. knowledge and competency to an organisation. Each member of an organisation is selected with a skill or competency that will assist the organisation in achieving its goals.
Sport Organisations are Goal Oriented:
This feature implies that sport organisations exist for a reason/ Goals refer to a future state towards which an individual, group of organisation itself strives.
Managing and Leading Sports Organisations
Differences between management and Leadership:
How managers use skills in management and leadership is very essential to the success or failure of organisations in the sports industry. In a large and competitive industry such as the sport industry there is a need for sound and balanced leadhership and management approaches. The question is, how does one define and distinguish between management and leadership?
Leadership:
(Kotter 1990) maintained that the processes of management and leadership are 2 distinctive and complementary systems of action… both are necessary for success in an increasingly complex and volatile business environment.
Management:
(Hershey and Blanchard 1988) provided one of the most comprehensive definitions of management. As the process of working with and through individuals and groups to accomplish organisational goals.
They define leadership as the process of influencing activities of an individual or group in effort towards goal achievement on a given situation.
While managers are often leaders, not all leaders are necessarily managers. The term leader is broader than the term manager. Since all employees will act as leaders at some time. Anytime a person attempts to influence the behaviors of others, regardless of the reason, that person is considered a leader. When others rely on a person, that person is a leader even if he/she is not in a managerial position.
Organisations in the sport industry are very dynamic and require managers with special skills and talents in both management and leadership.
Management as a Process in Sport Organisations
Most people see management as a process. The process implies that managers use a set of ongoing interactive activities, commonly known as the underlying processes of management, for accomplishing the goals and objectives of their respective organisations, departments or work units. Such processes were first introduced more than 6 decades ago (POSDCORB) this is an acronym that describes the underlying processes of Planning Organising Staffing Directing Coordination Reporting Budgeting
Process Approach
Using a set of ongoing interactive activities, commonly known as the underlying processes of management, for accomplishing the goals and objectives of an organsation, department or work unit. In terms of sports organisations we will look at 5 of these processes of management. Contemporary sports management theorists use the process approach to describe the management of sport organisation. although the models differ from one to another, most generally agree about the nature of the management process. Typically the process starts with planning and ends with controlling or evaluation. Managers engage in different activities in different sequences. However, with some performing several activities simultaneously as they carry out the responsibilities of their jobs. The element that is common or universal in all the processes however and whenever they are performed is decision making.
POSDCORB
- Planning: Developing and implementing goals, objectives, strategies, procedures, policies and rules to produce goods and services in the most effective and efficient manner. Example: the general manager of a private sports club predicts the increase in enrollment at the start of the new year and arrange for the facilities to be open 18 hours instead of 15 hours.
- Organisaing: Arranging resources (financial, human, equipment, supplies, time, space, informational) for producing goods and services in the most effective and efficient manner. Example: After conducting an assessment the general manager establishes a work unit for teaching golf at the club. A full-time coordinator is appointed who will coordinate three teaching pros and a new golf course with adequate budget.
- Staffing: Recruiting resources (financial, human, equipment, supplies, time, space, informational) for producing goods and services in the most effective and efficient manner. Example: the general manager advertises the position 3 teaching pros, 1 maintenance person and 1 administrative assistant. The general manager then holds interviews, check references, makes job offers and then select the staff needed for the job.
Trait Approach to Leadership
The trait approach is based on a set of universal characterisitcs associated with effective leaders. The traits of a leader may be classified in the areas of personality, abilities, and physical attributes. (Woodford 1982) personality is associated with social and personal traits. This approach attempts to develop a logical link between the personality traits of leaders and effective leadership. The basic assumption of the theory is that good leaders may share some common personality traits. If those personality traits could be identified they may be used as criteria in leader identification. The diagnosis of those commonalities may provide people in professional sport with ideas about who to hire as leaders of professional sports leagues. General knowledge, fairness and intelligence are among the traits most frequently mentioned. The people who challenge this approach argue that the possession of those personality traits does not always guarantee that a person will become a good leader.
Behavioural Approach to Leadership
The creators of the behavioral approach to leadership believe that people need more than certain personality traits to be effective leaders. According to this approach effective leaders demonstrate one of 2 major styles or dimensions: consideration and initiating structure (Kerr and Schriesheim 1974). Consideration describes the extent to which leaders have relationships with subordinates. Such relationships are established on the basis of mutual trust, respect and consideration of subordinates’ ideas and feelings. Considerate leaders care about their employees and strongly support comradery in the workplace.
Situational (Contingency) Approach to Leadership
Unlike the trait and behavioral approaches the common theme of this approach is that there is no single best style of leadership for every situation. Effective managers are those who can change their leadership styles to meet the needs of their followers and the given situation
They are several Models of the situational approach to leadership.
1. Fiedler Contingency Model 1967
2. The path-goal Model Evans 1970, House 1971
3. The Situational model Hershey, Blanchard and Johnson 2001
- Fiedler Contingency Model
Fiedler developed the first situational theory of leadership in 1967 he reported that the performance of a group depends on the interaction between leadership styles and situational variables. Leadership style is determined by a measurement instrument called the least preferred co-worker. This is a projective technique which a manager/leader is asked to think about the individual with whom the leader can work the least well. It is the individual who the manager/leader has had the most difficulty in getting a task completed. It is not about an individual that the leader likes better. It is about identifying the leader as being primarily task oriented or the leader as being relationship oriented. High scores on the instrument are associated with the relationship leadership style. And this is according to Ayman, Chemires and Fiedler 1997.
- Path-Goal Model
Like Fiedler’s model this model attempts to determine the most appropriate leadership styles for different situations. Developed (House 1971), it focuses on how a leader influences followers perceptions of work goals, self development goals, and path goal accomplishment. (House 1971 and Mitchell 1974,1977). The theory has two general propositions. First, the degree of suvordinates’ acceptance of the certain leadership style depends on whether they believe such behavior is an immediate source of satisfaction or instrumental to future satisfaction. Secondly, the leader’s behavior is motivational and affects the satisfaction and efforts of the subordinates. Two contingency variables moderate the relationship between leadership behavior and subordinate satisfaction; the personal characteristics of the subordinates and the environmental pressure and demands with which subordinates must comply in order to accomplish the work goals and to satisfy their needs.
- Situational Leadership Model
The third model in the situational approach to leadership is the Situational Leadership Model developed by Hershey, Blanchard and Johnson (2001). Unlike the Feilder and House model this model consist of 4 patterns of communication that mangers may choose to use in talking to their subordinates or followers. These 4 patterns are telling, Selling, Participating and Delegating. In order to decide which leadership style is most appropriate, managers must be able to assess the readiness of th efloowers and the ability and willingness of the followers to perform a task. Once managers have identified the readiness levels of the person or group they are attempting to influence, they can then choose the most appropriate leadership style. Telling and selling are both primarily leader oriented and one directional communication. Participating and delegating are primarily follower oriented and one directional communication. Participating and delegating are primarily follower oriented and two directional communication. From this model a manager’s primary style can be determined. The primary style is defined a the behavior pattern managers use, most often when attempting to influence the behaviors of others.
Transactional and Transformational Approaches to Leadership
Unless the trait, behavioral and situational approaches the transactional and transformational approaches have more to do with a leaders impact on the organisation. The transactional and transformational approaches focus primarily on relationships that managers develop with members in their respective organisation.
Transactional Leadership refers to three types of exchanges that occur between leaders and followers:
1. Contingent Rewarding
2. Management by exception (active)
3. Management by exception (passive)
This is all according to (bass 1985 and Dorothy 1997). Leaders reward or discipline followers in exchange for flowers performing a mutually agreed upon task.
Transformational leaders raise the consciousness of their leaders about the importance of outcomes and how to reach those outcomes by going beyond their own self-interest. Transformational leaders are charismatic pr exhilarating, influential, inspirational, intellectually stimulating,and individually considerate. While most managers engage in both transactional and transformational leadership behaviors, they do so in different amounts (Bass 1985).
Transformational Leadership:
- Charisma: shares a vision and a sense of vision with followers
- Inspirational Motivation: increasing the optimism and enthusiasm of followers
- Intellectual Stimulation: encourages followers to consider new ways to look at old methods and problems
- Individual Consideration: gives personal attention to followers and make each feel important
Transactional Leadership:
- Contingent Reward: gives followers a clear understanding of what is expected of them, then arranges to exchange the rewards.
- Management by exception: monitors followers’ performances and takes corrective action when mistakes or failures are observed
- Laissez- Faire Leadership: little or no leadership or contact is made with the staff members
The sport producing sector is the core of the sport industry and supportive subsectors surround an overlap with the activity producing core. Organisations in these subsectors either provide products and services to the core organisations. Sell or trade products related to sport. This model differs conceptually from the other 2 models in that it places sport at the center and illustrates the dependence of the subsectors on the production of the sporting activity.