Spinal cord Injury- hope for the future? Flashcards
What are the potential processes that can be targeted for therapy after SCI?
1) sprouting of undamaged pathways and regeneration of damaged pathways- formation of new circuits
2) activation of immunological mechanisms
3) secondary injury: compression, ischemia, sodium/calcium mediated cell injury excitotoxicity
4) spinal reorganization of functional sensorimotor networks
What clinical intervention have been done to try and promote sprouting ?
anti-NOGO to foster formation of new circuits
anti-Rho to facilitate axonal growth
What clinical interventions have been done to try and activate immunological mechanisms ?
autologous macrophage grafts/vaccines to favour axonal growth
What clinical interventions have been done to try and prevent secondary damage?
ST ASCIS trials - early decompression/stabilisation
riluzole trial- targeting sodium/glutamate mediated cell injury
What clinical interventions have been done to promote spinal reorganization of functional sensorimotor networks?
locomotor training to rehabilitate remnant sensorimotor functions
What happens in the secondary response?
it occurs after the physical damage and it is classified as the inflammatory response
- still unsure as to whether promoting or reducing macrophages is beneficial or not
What is reparixin and what did it do ?
1 hour after the operation
- it is an antagonist at receptor of cytokine induced neutrophil chemoattractant - these induce recruitment and activation of neutrophils
- it alleviated symptoms in rats after having clip compression SCI
What is a reduced inflammatory response associated with ?
it is associated with improvements and this could be linked to sparing of descending pathways
What do antibodies against alpha4beta1 integrin do ?
they reduce autonomic dysreflexia and spare serotonergic axons
Why is reducing the secondary response useful?
it reduces the loss of spared descending pathways
What did anti-alpha 4 do ?
the descending pathways were better maintained and serotonin onto sympathetic neurones seem to be spared
- there was however little improvement for the VH motoneurones
- does appear to be an effective way of treating autonomic dysreflexia
When anti-alpha4 was taken to clinical trials what was the outcome?
3 trials later with 1316 patients trialed and there were huge debates over the following conclusion
“an option in the treatment of patients with acute spinal cord injuries that should be undertaken only with the knowledge that the evidence suggesting harmful side effects is more consistent than any suggestion of clinical benefit”
- huge problem with side effects and no clinical benefits
therefore we are not seeing the follow through to clinical trials
What were some of the issues in clinical trials involving macrophages?
many patients drop out of clinical trials and majority failed after pre-screen
in the end only 50 patients after pre-screen
patients had to undergo major surgery again - only 2 weeks after the injury - injected around the lesion site
What was the outcome of the clinical trial involving macrophage treatment ?
6 months after the surgery it proved there were no improvements with 41% of the controls staying the same while those that were treated 73% remained asia a therefore this indicated the treatment actually had detrimental effects
12 months after the surgery the treated patients were worse off
neither autonomic or motor effects improved
What are some of the conclusions from this clinical trial?
- its difficult to get patients to undergo surgery
- the treatment may have needed to be carried out earlier
- also very difficult to treat just around the target area
What is meant by the wrong type of macrophages could have been used?
M1= killer cells and they appear to increase M2= beneficial macropages and these seem to decrease