Sperry et al (1968) Flashcards
What are the main functions of the left and right hemisphere of the brain?
The lefts role is language, reasoning and logical thought.
The right hemispheres function is creativity, imagination and spacial awareness.
What hemispheres of the brain control each hand?
The right hemisphere controls of the left hand, while the right hemisphere controls the right hand.
What was the aim of Sperry’s research?
To show the independent streams of conscious awareness possessed by each hemisphere and to show how each hemisphere has its own memories
What was the research method used in research by Sperry?
A quasi experiment.
Can also be augured that that because extensive tests were carried out on so few participants it could be seen as a set of case studies.
What was the IV in research by Sperry?
IV: having a split brain or not Participants with split-brains had already undergone hemisphere deconnection to reduce severe epilepsy. No
actual control group was necessary for comparison in the study because the functions and abilities of the visual fields and hemispheres in non
split-brain individuals was already known.
What was the DV in research by Sperry?
DV: the participant’s ability to perform a variety of visual and tactile tests
What was the sample Sperry used?
• 11 patients who had undergone an operation to sever their Corpus Colosseum for treatment of epilepsy.
There operations took place at a range of times from the earliest being 5 and a half years ago.
What were the key tests conducted?
Visual test
Tactile test
What was the visual test used?
The participant (with one covered eye) centred their gaze on a screen.
A visual stimulus appeared on the screen from 1/10 of a second, to fast to get the eyes in the wrong visual field.
Everything projected to the left of the screen is passed via
the left visual field (LVF) to the right hemisphere and vice versa.
What was the tactile test used?
Below a screen there was a gape so participants could reach object but not see them.
Objects were placed in either the Ps left or right hand or both hands.
Information about the objects placed in the left hand is processed by the right hemisphere and vica versa.
What were the key findings from the visual test?
Information shown and responded to in one visual field could only be recognised again if shown to the same visual field.
Information present to the RVF could be described in speech. If the same information was present to the LVF the participant said they did not see anything. However the participant could point with his left hand to a matching picture of the object.
$ sign to the LVF and ? to the RVF, the participant could draw the $
sign with his left hand but reported that he had seen a ?
What were the results for the tactile tests?
Objects placed in the right hand could be described in speech or writing.
If the same objects were placed in the left
hand participants could only make wild guesses and often seemed unaware they were holding anything.
When two objects were placed simultaneously in each hand and then hidden in a pile of objects, both hands selected their own object and
ignored the other hand’s object.
What are the main conclusions from Sperry’s research?
People with split brains have two separate visual processors, each with its own train of visual images.
Split-brain patients have a lack of cross-integration.
Split-brain patients seem to have two independent streams of consciousness, each with its own memories, perceptions and impulses ie two
minds in one body.
Evaluate the research method used by Sperry
Highly controlled experimental design, such as the time the image showed up for.
As it was a Quasi experiment it may have been hard to change the effects of previous treatment such as drug treatment participants had had.
Evaluate the data collected by Sperry
The data collected was qualitative descriptions of participants actions, this provided rich and detailed data.
However if quantitative data was collected it would of been easier to quantify and directly compare between groups. The qualitative data interpretations may have been subjective.