SPEECH AUDIOMETRY Flashcards
SPEECH
AUDIOMETRY
▪Pure tone testing
▪Degree and type of hearing loss
▪Speech testing
▪Communication ability
SLP CLINICAL RELEVANCE
SLP CLINICAL RELEVANCE
▪ SLP and Speech Audiometry
▪ Provides functional
audiometric information
▪ Planning therapy goals
▪ Counseling purposes
SPEECH DYNAMICS
Most important Frequencies for speech
▪ Intensity
▪ whisper - 20 dB HL
▪ normal conversational speech - 50 to 60 dB
▪ loud speech - 70 dB
▪ shouting - 90 dB
▪ Frequency
▪ about 250 to 8000 Hz
▪ most important speech sounds
>▪ 500 through 6000 Hz
▪ Suprasegmental
▪ duration, intonation, pitch (DIP)
SPEECH AUDIOMETRY tests
THRESHOLD TESTS
▪ Speech Recognition Threshold
(SRT)
▪ Speech Detection or Awareness
Threshold
(SDT) or (SAT)
SUPRA THRESHOLD TESTS
▪ Word Recognition Score (WRS)
▪ Most Comfortable Loudness
Level (MCL)
▪ Uncomfortable Loudness Level
(UCL)
SPEECH RECOGNITION THRESHOLD (SRT)
▪ Minimum hearing level for speech at which an individual can recognize
50% of the speech material (ASHA, 1988)
▪ Spondee Words – 2 syllable words with equal stress on each syllable
▪ Validates pure tone findings
▪ SRT is within +/- 7 dB of 3 –Frequency PTA or average of best 2
thresholds for precipitously sloping HFSNHL
▪ Baseline for word recognition testing
SRT AND PTA RELATIONSHIP –
VALIDATION OF PURE TONE FINDINGS
SRT should agree with the 3-
frequency PTA + 7dB
▪Cross check principle
▪Right ear – SRT of 35 dB HL
supports 3 Frequency PTA
of 40 dB HL
RE: SRT: 35
3 F-PTA: 40
▪ When does the SRT not agree with the 3 F-PTA
▪ Steeply sloping HL
▪ LE: SRT of 15 dB HL does not equal the 3 F-PTA
of 40 dBHL
▪ Use 2 F-PTA
▪ LE: SRT of 15 dB HL supports the 2 F-PTA of
20 dB HL
▪ Functional HL
▪ There is disagreement between the SRT and
PTA which cannot be explained by audiogram
configuration
DIFFICULT TO TEST POPULATION
•Nonverbal
•Severe HL
•Speech-Language Deficits
RECOMMENDED SRT
PROCEDURE
▪Familiarize patient with spondee list at MCL
▪Begin 30 dB above PTA
▪Down 10 dB for each correct response and up 5 for incorrect
response
▪ Threshold – softest level at which 3 out of 6 spondees are
correctly repeated (50% level)
PRESENTATION OF SPEECH STIMULI
Monitored Live Voice (MLV)
▪Must monitor level of signal
(vu meter)
▪ Offers greater flexibility
▪Quicker than recorded
Recorded Material
▪Greater test consistency
across presentation
▪Slower
▪Best for word recognition
testing comparison
SPEECH DETECTION OR AWARENESS
(SDT OR SAT)
▪Minimum hearing level for speech at which an individual can just
discern the presence of a speech material 50% of the time. (ASHA,
1988)
▪Used if SRT cannot be obtained due to:
▪Severity of hearing loss
▪Limited language reception or expressive skills
▪ Nonverbal developmentally delayed population
▪ Infants and small children
▪SDT is 5 - 10dB better than SRT
DO WE PERFORM BONE CONDUCTION
SRT / SDT?
Only if using speech stimuli to determine TYPE of HL.
▪Compare speech thresholds by air conduction vs.
bone conduction
▪Children or Low Functioning Population may respond
more reliablely to speech vs tonal stimuli.
WORD RECOGNITION SCORE (WRS)
▪Assesses ability to understand speech when
presented at supra-threshold levels.
▪ Reported in percentage of words correctly
identified.
▪Measured scores are predictable from degree,
configuration and type of loss
▪ Speech Material
• Phonetically balanced (PB) word list
• Contain all the phonetic elements of speech
• 4 lists of 50 words each.
• CID W-22
• NU-6
• Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant words
▪ Additional WR Tests
WRS TEST METHOD
Test Procedure
WRS TEST METHOD
Test Procedure
▪Presentation Level
• 30-40dB above SRT (30-40dBSL) = PB Max
➢ PB Max = level at which maximum word recognition score
is obtained
• MCL if 30-40dBSL is too loud
WRS TEST METHOD
Test Considerations
WRS TEST METHOD
Test Considerations
▪Half list (25 words)vs. whole (50 words)lists
•½ lists are as diagnostically reliable as whole lists.
•Less time consuming
•Each word has weight of 4%
▪Carrier phrase – “Say the word”
RECORDING WORD RECOGNITION SCORES
▪Calculate and record percentage of correct responses
▪Scoring Word Recognition
•90-100% Excellent
•80 – 90% Good
•70 - 80% Fair
•50 - 70% Poor
•< 50% Very poor