Speech (1A) Flashcards
Content Based
Generally SS ==> State may only regulate the content of speech if the regulation is necessary to achieve a compelling government interest and is narrowly tailored to meet that interest
EXCEPTIONS ==> FIDOC
Commercial speech
Entitled to intermediate First Amendment protection when it concerns lawful activity and is neither false nor misleading.
Restrictions on such speech are valid if the regulation is narrowly tailored to** serve a substantial governmental interest. **
In this context, narrowly tailored does not mean the least restrictive means available; rather, there must be a “reasonable fit” between the government’s ends and the means chosen to accomplish those ends.
Unprotected Speech
FIDOC
1. Fighting words/threats
2. Inciting violence
3. Defamation
4. Obscenity
5. Commercial Speech
The First Amendment free speech clause generally prohibits the government from regulating speech based on its content (i.e., the message being communicated). But certain categories of speech fall outside First Amendment protection and can be freely regulated by the government.
Publication of govt info
SYKE
There is no right to access government information
==> there is a First Amendment right to publish truthful information. As a result, any government restriction on this right is unconstitutional unless it survives strict scrutiny.
Govt Funding Restriction
The government **CAN **condition funding on the promise that the funds be used for a particular purpose.
But it CANNOT condition funding on a recipient’s promise to refrain from engaging in protected First Amendment conduct if that conduct is unrelated to the funding’s purpose or scope.
Source = 1A
Campaign Finance
Contribution Restrictions ==> IS
=changing the limits amounts
A. Limit on amount of contribution to:
-single candidate; OR
-political candidates, parties & action committees combined
B. Increase of limit on amount of contribution to candidate when self-financed opponent exceeds certain spending amount
**Laws may NOT limit contributions to ballot measures. **
Expenditure Restrictions ==> RR
= limits on the who/ select parties:
-corporations or unions in support of or opposition to candidate
-candidate on his/her own behalf
Expressive conduct (symbolic speech)
Subject to a lesser degree of protection than speech;
a regulation of expressive conduct is upheld if:
* The regulation is w/in the govt’s power to enact;
* It furthers an important govt interest;
* The interest is unrelated to the suppression of ideas; and
* Burden on speech is no greater than necessary.
Overbreadth
A law that burdens a substantial amount of speech or other conduct constitutionally protected by the First Amendment is **“overbroad” **and therefore void (does not apply to
commercial speech)
Overbroad statutes may be challenged as “facially invalid” (even by those who are validly regulated) to prevent a chilling effect on protected speech
==> Vagueness—a statute void for vagueness if it fails to provide a person of ordinary intelligence with fair notice of what is prohibited
Prior Restraints
Prior restraints—regulation of speech that occurs in advance of its expression
- Generally presumed to be unconstitutional, with limited exceptions
- The limited exceptions require at a minimum that:
(i) there is a particular harm to be
avoided; and
(ii) certain procedural safeguards are provided to the speaker, e.g.,
o The standards must be narrowly drawn, reasonable, and definite;
o The censoring body must promptly seek an injunction; and
o There must be a prompt and final judicial determination of the validity of the restraint. - The burden is on the government to prove that the material to be censored is not protected speech
Unfettered Discretion
- A law or regulation that permits a governmental official to restrict speech must provide definite standards as to how to apply the law in order to prevent governmental officials from having unfettered discretion over its application
- A statute that gives officials unfettered discretion is void on its face
Freedom not to speak
- 1A protects not only freedom of speech, but also the freedom not to speak
- However, a state can compel a private entity (e.g., a shopping mall) to permit individuals to exercise their own free-speech rights when the private entity is open to the public and the message is not likely to be attributable to the private entity
- Although one may be compelled to join or financially support a group with respect to one’s employment, one cannot be forced to fund political speech by that group
Campaign related speech
Contributions—statutes limiting campaign contributions are subject to intermediate scrutiny
Expenditures—in contrast to campaign contributions, restrictions on expenditures by individuals and entities (including corporations and unions) on communications during
an election campaign regarding a candidate are subject to strict scrutiny
Public Forums
Traditional—historically associated with expression (e.g., sidewalks, streets, parks)
Designated—not historically used for speech-related activities, but which the
government has opened for such use (e.g., civic auditoriums, publicly owned theaters, or school classrooms afterhours)
In either forum, the restrictions generally must:
o Be content-neutral as to both subject matter and viewpoint;
o Be **narrowly tailored **to serve a significant governmental interest (i.e., promote interest that would be achieved less effectively absent the regulation); and
o **Leave open ample alternative channels for communication **of the information.
**Injunction—the test for the constitutionality of injunctions in public forums depends **on whether the injunction is content-neutral or content-based
o Content-neutral—whether it burdens no more speech than is necessary to achieve an important governmental interest
o Content-based—it must be necessary for the government to achieve a compelling governmental interest
May impose reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on speech activities on the campus.
Non Public Forums
(or “limited public forum”)—all public property that is not a traditional or
designated public forum
The government may regulate speech-related activities in nonpublic forums as long as the regulation is:
(i) viewpoint-neutral **and **
(ii) reasonably related to a legitimate governmental interest
o Viewpoint-neutral—the government may prohibit speech on certain issues altogether, but it may not allow only one side of an issue to be presented
o Reasonable—the restriction must be rationally related to a legitimate governmental
interest
- Personal property—regulation of speech on a person’s own private property will rarely be upheld, particularly content-based regulations; no First Amendment right to express oneself on someone else’s private property
Regulation of the media
Media has no greater 1A rights than the general public
- General considerations—regulation of the right to publish about matters of public concern is subject to strict scrutiny
* Gag orders—subject to prior-restraint analysis; ==> rarely upheld
* Attending trials—the right to attend trials may be outweighed if the judge finds an overriding interest that cannot be accommodated by less restrictive means
* Illegally obtained private info—permitted to publish if third party (unknown to publisher) obtained info and involves matter of public concern
* No constitutional privilege to protect sources - Broadcast
* Radio and television broadcasters are said to have a greater responsibility to the public; they can be more closely regulated than print and other media
* Broadcasters may be sanctioned for airing “patently offensive sexual and excretory speech,” even if such speech does not qualify as obscene
* Public access stations are not considered to be state actors - Cable television—content-based regulations of cable broadcasters are subject to strict scrutiny
- Internet—any regulation of Internet content is subject to strict scrutiny