SP Praxis Exam Flashcards
Forms of data collection
background data collection/problem identification lvl, screening lvl, progress monitoring/RTI lvl, formal assessment
background data/prob identification lvl
identify/label the problem
ex. student records, staff intervention, medical records, review previous interventions, developmental history
screening lvl
identify at-risk students or students who struggle with academic work
progress monitoring/RTI lvl
data to determine effectiveness of intervention
formal assessment
(SpEd lvl) Cognitive, Social Emotional data from formal standardized measures
interview techniques
structured, unstructured, semi-structured interviews
structured interviews
standardized/formal, tells presence/absence of problem (not lvl of function), can compare with norms; CANNOT MODIFY FORMAT AS THIS IS STRICT
unstructured interviews
conversational/relaxed interviews; responses can be difficult to interpret and cannot be compared with social norms
semi-structured
combo of both structured and unstructured interviews that allows for follow up questions and flexibility
observational techniques
whole interval recording, frequency/event recording, duration recording, latency recording, time-sampling interval recording, partial-interval recording, momentary time sampling
whole interval recording
Bx recorded when it occurs during whole time interval; good for continuous Bx during short duration
frequency event recording
record # of Bx during specific period
duration recording
length of time specific behavior lasts
latency recording
time btw initiation of stimulus of behavior
time-sampling interval recording
divide time period into equal intervals & record behavior if occurs; effective when unable to determine start/end of behavior or when short period of time available to observe
partial-interval recording
multiple behavior scored as 1 if occurs at any time in interval; effective when behavior occurs at low/inconsistent rate
momentary time sampling
behavior scored as present or absent within time interval (least biased estimate of behavior)
Purpose of universal screening
see if modifications are needed in core curriculum while serving as guiding decisions for additional needed instruction
pros and cons of universal screening
Pros: cost-effective, time-efficient, easy to administer
Cons: can misclassify students
least dangerous assumption of universal screening
it is better to give support to students who don’t need it than not giving support to students who need it
universal screening measures
curriculum-based (CBM), fluency-based indicators of skills, cognitive assessment test (CogAT), state education agencies, & systems to enhance educational performance (STEEP)
curriculum-based measures (CBM)
used only if aligns with norms, benchmarks, and standards; specific forms of criterion referenced assessments where curriculum, goals, and objectives are “criteria” for assessment items
ex. DIBELS for reading fluency
fluency-based indicators of skills
initial-sound fluency, letter-naming fluency, phoneme segmentation, nonsense word fluency, oral-reading fluency
cognitive assessment test (CogAT)
cognitive measure; group administered and used as a screener