Sources of law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the sources of Roman law?

A
Leges 
Edicts of the magistrates 
Senatusconsulta 
Principum plata 
Responsa
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are leges?

A

Leges were enacted by the popular assembly. They were often associated with plebiscites (ordinances of the plebs)

They were constitutional in nature and dealt with matters relating to public order

The only legislative power that the people had was to refuse the proposals of the Emperor/ magistrates

The Emperor could convoke the assemblies and submit proposals to them. The Emperor also controlled the magistracies as he personally recommended the presiding magistrates. Thus, it is clear that the Emperor had ultimate legislative power.

The popular assemblies never had the right to initiate legislation- voted on legislation submitted to them by the presiding magistrate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the definition of a source of law?

A

The origin or how the law was created

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the difference between Gaius and Justinian’s classification of the sources of law?

A

Gaius believed that imperial enactments were important sources of law in the 2nd century.

Justinian added custom as a source of law. Otherwise, it remained the same. There were local and regional variations to custom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were the sources of law in the archaic period? (monarchy)

A

It was a mixture of custom and royal decree. Custom is law which acquired authority through long observance. It was unwritten law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why did custom decline in importance?

A

It declined in importance particularly after the publication of the XII tables/ as the law was written down by the jurists

The Twelve Tables had to be enacted due to popular discontent- law was administered and controlled by the plebeians

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were royal decrees?

A

Laws of the kings acquired direct and binding legal force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What were the most important sources of law during the Republic?

A

Legislation
Edicts of the magistrates
Interpretation of those learned in law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the significance of the Twelve Tables?

A

The Twelve Tables was Rome’s first code of law. It was enacted by the comitia centuriata. It was probably based on the existing customary laws in Rome.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the importance of the assemblies?

A

Comitia centuriata- elected the higher ranking magistrates
Comitia tributa
Concilium plebis- responsible for the plebiscites which came to acquire as much authority as statutes after the lex Hortensia. Became the most prominent assembly before the end of the Republic.

Voted on proposals sent from the magistrates. However, it was inherently corrupt as they voted in groups. Moreover,r in the comitia centuriata the higher ranking centuries voted first and this tended to influence subsequent voters

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the role of the lex Hortensia?

A

The plebiscites have to be followed by the patricians as well as the plebeians

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the role of the senate?

A

The senate did not have legislative power and it was more of an advisory council. The magistrates had to send their proposals to the senate before it could be put in front of the assembly.
It had the power to veto legislation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the role of the edicts of the magistrates?

A

High-ranking magistrates had the power to issue edicts. This came to supplement the ius civile be the ius honorarium (the law of the magistrates)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the role of the urban praetor?

A

An urban praetor was created as the consuls were too busy dealing with wars. The urban praetor exercised legal jurisdiction within the city. The urban praetor was responsible for conducting the administration of justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why was a peregrine praetor created?

A

A single praetor became insufficient with the influx of foreigners in Rome/ expansion/ the constitutio antoniana. The peregrine praetor exercised jurisdiction among the foreigners

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How was the praetor responsible for creating a more flexible formulary system?

A

Initially, the praetor did not have much opportunity to influence the law because he was strictly bound to follow the ius civile. Influx of foreigners who could not participate in the legis actiones confined to civilians. The peregrine praetor created a new system- the formulary system. Eventually it was absorbed into the ius civile. The formulary system was much more flexible and gave the praetor discretion when dealing with particular disputes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Edicts issued by the praetor

A

Enabled the evolution of the ius honorarium as the praetor could allow new remedies or defences. The edict also normally consisted of measures adopted by the previous praetor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What was the ius honorarium?

A

the law developed in edicts issued by the praetors during the Republic and early Empire, aiding, supplementing or amending existing rules or procedures of the ius civile. It was finalized in the 2nd century A.D. in the Edictum Perpetuum.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

How did the praetor’s role develop? How did the praetor become a substantial source of law in the late republic?

A

early years the urban praetor had little room for manouuvere- limited to aiding civil law because of formalism of legis actiones. The praetors became more radical, particularly after the lex Aebutia which formally reconised the applicability of the formularly system to disputes between citizens. By the late republic the praetors had become the leading reformers within the Roman legal system- remedies included robberies, fraud and duress and more effective protection of property interests.

The fact that the praetors were able to ‘correct’ the civil law in such important matters demonstrates the extent of their indirect law-making powers in the late republic.

20
Q

What was interpretatio?

Pontiffs had a monopoly on the law

A

The interpreters were the college of priests and one was appointed each year to preside over the citizens. In early law there was a clear link between religion and law as the pontiffs were the interpreters of law. Their advice on the meaning and applicability of the law constituted interpretatio.

Their ability to do this was facilitated by the lack of information about litigation procedures in the Twelve Tables- allowed the pontiffs to exercise influence over civil disputes. Eventually, they were replaced by the jurists who were learned in law and gave legal opinions (response) in public. They were men from aristocratic families and gave responsa perhaps to gain respect as they wanted to go into politics

21
Q

What work was done by the jurists of the late republic?

A

To give advice- they were approached by the praetors, magistrates etc on advice on how to discharge their functions. Advice was not legally binding but helped to elucidate the law
Teaching
Jurists wrote commentaries on the XII tables- established a tradition of legal writing.

22
Q

Why was juristic writing significant?

A

Juristic literature converted Roman law into a science- body of laws that was analysed in writing

23
Q

What were the sources of law during the Empire?

A

The Empire was split into the Principate and the Dominate. During the Principate was when Roman law achieved its highest level of development because of the work of the jurists. However, there was a decline of Roman law during the Dominate it was imperial decrees and interpretatio that became more prominent

The Dominate was a period of decline as imperial decree essentially became the sole source of law. Imperial decree was the most important legislation

24
Q

Principate

A

At first, Augustus preserved many elements of the Republican constitution- assemblies, senate

25
Q

How did the role of the senate change during the principate?

A

Became much more prominent and although it initially had no legislative power it effectively replaced the assemblies and came to be regarded as the primary legsislative organ . Emperor exercised control over the senate and the assembly. Senatusconsulta- acquired force as the Emperor was a leading member of the senate- in the reign of Hadrian senatusconsulta acquired direct binding legal force without the need for praetorian intervention- the senate by this time had become a tool for imperial will.

The senate ceased to make laws in 200AD

26
Q

What was the role of the Emperor in making law?

A

Ulpian- ‘a decision given by the Emperor has the force of a statute. This is because the populace commits to him and into him its own entire authority and power’

This shows that imperial law-making was important in the later empire. The Emperor emerged as the sole source of legislative authority

27
Q

What were the main forms of imperial decree?

A

Edicta
Decreta
Mandata
Rescripta

28
Q

What was the role of Edicta?

A

The emperor like the magistrates had the power to issue edicts. However, unlike the magistrates (lapsed after time in office) the edict only lapsed on the death of the emperor and the edict could tackle an unlimited range of problems- for magistrates it was only their particular jurisdiction- wide scope.

29
Q

What was decreta?

A

Decrees of law. The emperor had substantial legal power.
‘Emperors had extensive judicial powers. They could decide cases on appeal or at first instance’. He could apply the existing law but had considerable discretion in its interpretatio. He could devise new principles and overrule existing law- council advised against radical departure from ius civile.

o Decisions by judges only affected parties in the case and were not regarded as precedents. However, imperial decretal were reported and filed in the imperial archives. They were regarded as authoritative because they were made by the emperor

o Jurists collected such decisions- as a result decreta acquired the status of binding precedents by the late classical period.

30
Q

What is mandata?

A

More administrative rather than law. On the advice of his council the emperor would issue detailed administrative instructions to subdue provincial governors etc

31
Q

What is rescripta?

A

Rescripta provided the richest source of imperial legislation. They were written replies from the emperor about legal questions or petitions

32
Q

What were the two kinds of rescripts?

A

Letter and subscriptiones
Epistulae were replies to queries from officials about their rights or duties- office of letters staffed by jurists- reply was a letter signed by emperor

o Subscriptiones were answers to queries from private citizens- queries presented in the form of a petition (private citizens not permitted to write to the Emperor)

o The query was dealt with by the bureau of petitions which would attach its answer to the petition- it was then signed by the emperor.

o Office of petitions was staffed by the leading jurists- ‘the issue of subscriptions became an ideal medium for the interpretation and development of the law’- e.g. the secretaryship of the office was held in turn by Papinian and Ulpian.

33
Q

What was the development of the edicts of the magistrates?

A

The praetor’s issued edicts, but their importance waned in 1 AD. As the emperor’s control over the state increased the praetor’s lost their influence over legal developments- especially after Hadrian commissioned Julian to draft a revision of all the praetorian edicts

34
Q

What was Julian’s consolidation called?

A

The Edictum perpetuum- was regarded as the final version of the praetor’s edict in terms of structure and content

35
Q

How did the role of the jurists change?

A

There was a change in how the jurists worked- they were increasingly employed by the state. At first this was on an ad hoc basis, but then more regularly.

The jurists were tasked with advising the Emperor (e.g. drafting imperial decrees), judges, public. In the early classical period, under Augustus the ius respondendi was introduced- enabled the jurists to give responsa with the authority of the emperor. Some responsa acquired more authority than others, for example if it was a written reply given under a seal to a judge it was almost binding.

Most leading jurists of the classical period were given the ius respondendi- responsa was only binding if it was given by jurists with ius respondendi

‘Gaius states that responsa are the opinions of men permitted to lay down the law’p44- if the opinions are unanimous, they have binding force, if not the judge can choose which to follow.

36
Q

What was the role of the jurists with regards to teaching?

A

Teaching was informal and students would attach themselves to eminent jurists. The proculian school was much more logical while the sabinian school justified things referring to the nature of things- much more custom based

37
Q

What was the role of juristic literature?

A

character of classical writing was casuistic- it was done on a case to case basis- involved extensive discussion of cases with little reference to abstract reasoning.

Proculian school was much more logical in their approach

38
Q

Who were the prominent jurists?

A

Papinian, Paul, Ulpian, Gaius (divided the law into persons, things and actions), Modestinus, Julian (solidified the edict)

39
Q

What was the period of decline in Roman law?

A

From the end of the classical period to the beginning of Justinian’s reign- the interim of this period. This was because Rome was becoming more Catholic and imperial decrees essentially became the sole source of law and the importance of jurists waned.

Dramatic change in post-classical legal development was the lack of outstanding jurists- lack of legal science from the classical period- the law had been analysed in great detail in legal literature- increasing weakness of the empire made juristic activity less likely

Transition of Rome from principate to dominate meant juristic activity lost individuality- it had to appear like it emanated from the Emperor.

40
Q

Post-classical legislation

A

The amount of legislation increased in the later Empire. This was because of the imperial decrees, rescripts etc.
The decrees issued by one emperor were not binding on all other emperors
Theodosian code was a collection of all the imperial decrees.

41
Q

How did Justinian’s codification begin?

A

Justinian’s codification began in AD528. It was difficult to ascertain the law before Justinian’s codification.

42
Q

What were the stages of Justinian’s codification?

A
Codex Vetus 
The Fifty Decisions 
Digest
Institutes
New Code 
Novellae
43
Q

What was the purpose of Justinian’s work?

A

Remove repetitions, make corrections, adapt to his reign- collect the law in a codex that could be used by citizens

44
Q

What was the codex vetus?

A

10 men collated all imperial enactments still in force into a code which repealed the Theodosian code and previous imperial enactments.

45
Q

What was the Fifty decisions?

A

AD 530 Justinian issued a number of decrees to remove obsolete rules, make corrections and resolve a number of contentious points of law. This was contained in the Fifty Decisions but a copy has not survived.

46
Q

What was the Digest?

A

A compilation of juristic literature that was adapted for contemporary use by Justinian’s compilers. It is the centrepiece of the Corpus Iuris Civilis. Led to the repeal oft the law of citations as all the jurists in the Digest were regarded as equals.

It was composed by a team of 10- lead by Tribonian. They wanted to remove any repetitions etc- read 1300 books- 38 different jurists. Argument about whether the books were actually read as they were compiled in 3 rather than 10 years.

He regarded the Digest as a model for the future and banned any commentaries. Flawed because it was intended to be used contemporarily

47
Q

What was the purpose of the Institutes?

A

Textbook for students