Sources of English Law ( Case Law ) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is case law?

A

Law made by a series of decisions made by judges in the higher courts, it usually develops law rather than create new law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What type of law is now most currently made by case law?

A

Contract and tort.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the two aspects of case law?

A

> The tools that judges use for statutory interpretation.

> The law of binding precedent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is Statutory interpretation?

A

The way that judges interpret complex and ambiguous statutes, in order to give the judgment that they believe parliament would have intended.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the different ways that judges can approach interpretation?

A

> Literal rule.
Golden rule.
Mischief rule/Purposeful rule.
Contextual.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the literal rule?

A

This is when judges take words at face value, it can cause absurd results.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the justification of using the literal rule?

A

Judges say that it is up to parliament, not court, to correct statute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a good example of the use of the literal rule?

A

WHITELY V CHAPPELL ( 1868 - 1869 ). In this case the defendant acted as a dead person at a vote, it was illegal to impersonate any person entitled to vote. The judge ruled that the dead person was not entitled to vote and hence the defendant was not charged. Clearly this is an absurd result.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the golden rule?

A

This is when judges modify literal meaning of words to avoid absurdity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is a good example of the golden rule?

A

ADLER V GEORGE ( 1964 ). A defendant was charged with being in the vicinity of a prohibited area. They argued that they were not in the vicinity but rather, in the prohibited area, the judge used the golden rule to interpret vicinity as including the actual place.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the mischief rule/purposeful rule?

A

The mischief rule was commonly used when statutes used to set out their purpose, including what they were trying to remedy. It’s aim is to identify what Parliament were trying to prevent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Where does the mischief rule originate from?

A

HEYDON’S CASE ( 1584 ).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is a good example of the purposeful rule?

A

CORKERY V CARPENTER ( 1950 ). The defendant was charged with being drunk on the highway in charge of a carriage, however he was wheeling a bicycle, the court looked to see what statute intended, and decided a carriage included a bicycle.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the contextual rule?

A

The meaning of a ambiguous word is taken from the statute as a whole, used when words can have multiple meanings or are vague on their own, for example a statute that referred to other animals, then talks about cats and dogs, it would be reasonable to assume that other animals meant domestic pets, IE: not sharks etc…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is an intrinsic aid?

A

Found within the statute, including the title, or in older statutes the preamble. Some acts will include interpretation clauses defining terms, EG: CONSUMER RIGHTS ACT 2015 includes definitions of ‘trader’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is an extrinsic aid?

A

Found outside of the statute.

17
Q

What are the main 4 extrinsic aids?

A

> INTERPRETATION ACT 1978 - Gives guidance on terms such as ‘he’ includes ‘she’ and ‘it’.
Reports of the law commission - As to why legislation is needed.
Previous statutes on same area of law.
Parliamentary reports - Since the case of PEPPER V HART ( 1993 ), courts can access ‘HANSARD’ when there is ambiguity.

18
Q

What are the 6 Judicial presumptions, relating to statutes?

A

> It applies to the whole of the UK.
It does not break UK international agreements.
It does not repeal earlier acts of Parliament.
It does not impose strict liability, so there must be intention.
It does not operate retrospectively.
It does not change common law.

19
Q

What is the law of binding precedent?

A

> Judges must apply the law in the same way as that of a superior or sometimes equal court has done in the past.

20
Q

What are the two factors that are crucial in determining if a previous decision is binding?

A

> The position in the court hierarchy of current and past court.
Whether the facts or point of law of current case are within scope of the previous decision.

21
Q

What courts are the magistrates bound by?

A

All higher courts.

22
Q

What courts are the county courts bound by?

A

All higher courts.

23
Q

What courts are the crown court bound by?

A

All higher courts.

24
Q

What courts are the high court divisional courts bound by?

A

The Supreme Court, the court of appeal and its own courts.

25
Q

What courts are the high court bound by?

A

The Supreme Court, the court of appeal, and their own divisional courts.

26
Q

What courts are the court of appeal bound by?

A

Bound by the Supreme Court.

27
Q

What court is the Supreme Court bound by?

A

None, but it rarely departs from previous decisions in order to prevent injustice or improper development of the law.

28
Q

What is ‘Ratio Decidendi’?

A

It is Latin for ‘reasons for deciding’ and represents the legal reasons vital to a judges decision, it is this that is binding.

29
Q

What is ‘obiter dicta’?

A

It means ‘things said by the way’ in Latin. And represents comments that are related but not strictly relevant to decision, this is not binding on future courts.

30
Q

What happens if the law changes and a case that won before would now lose?

A

In some cases the change can be retrospective and so the earlier decision would be overturned, but this is not always the case.

31
Q

What is an example of a law changing?

A

In the past you were not liable for injury to a trespasser on your property, but now you can be held liable.

32
Q

What are the 4 main advantages of precedent?

A

> Certainty - A party can be given accurate advice about likely outcome.
Speed - Law can be developed without waiting for parliament to legislate.
Flexibility - Judges can distinguish cases based on facts or point of law, higher courts can overrule lower courts.
Saves money and time in court.

33
Q

What are the 3 main disadvantages of precedent?

A

> Rigidity - Rules can inhibit the development of law.
Undemocratic - Judges can develop the law but were not elected to do so, can be seen as a conflict of parliamentary sovereignty.
Haphazard development of law - Changes in law require a case with relevant facts reaching the appropriate level of court.