Sources and Effects of EU LAw Flashcards
Commission’s Role
Art 17 TEU Commission is the only proposing legislative body in the EU. However, it does not mean that other institutions can’t influence how the the law is proposed or what is proposed, but ultimately it is the decision of the Commission.
Legislative Procedure
Been several different ones, EP is now more involved. Used to be co-decision procedure is now the ordinary procedure. Special procedures need more detail called consultation or consent procedure.
Ordinary Legislative Procedure
Art 294 TEU. Commission proposes the legislation then EP and Commission agree on whether or not it should become law. Can take up to 3 readings, on the second reading a conciliation committee made up in order to help find a common text. It can be rejected at the second reading, but Member States have a large say.
Budget
Similar procedure for the budget as there is for the legislation. EU money comes from proportion of VAT, contribution from MS’s and revenue custom.
Competence of the Union
Art 5(1) TEU Subsidiarity, Proportionality and Conferral are the three principles which it is based upon. Exclusive Competence - Only the EU may legislate, MS can legislate if then empowered to do so. Shared Competence - EU can legislate, but if they haven't then the MS is free to do so.
Principle of Conferral
Not going outside of limits of powers given to them within treaties created by Member States. If not conferred then the power remains with the Member State. Member State must agree to be bound.
Principle of Subsidiarity
If it is not an area which the Union have exclusive control over then they technically do not legislate, but if the proposed action would be better legislated at a Union level then they do, this may be because at a Member State level they can’t achieve it to the best degree of the objective.
National Parliaments ensure that this principle is being adhered to. They have an effective yellow card rule, whereby is 1/3 of national parliament aren’t happy with law then it must be looked into. Yet issues with focus on national issues, rather than EU ones, many national governments don’t tend to go against the EU either.
Principle of Proportionality
Not exceeding what is needed to achieve the objective
CoJ’s role in the principles of competence
Take a broad view on conferral competencies, but a narrowed view on subsidiarity acts. If stated to carry out a task than Commission per se has the powers to do so. Germany v Commission. Only require limited procedural evidence that principle of subsidiarity has taken place, does not engage in complicated socio-economic evaluation, only that they have thought about which branch of legislation should impose the objective
Instruments used by Union to exercise competence
Regulations, Directives, Decisions and Recommendations and Opinions.
Hierarchy?
There isn’t one, as it shows that the Union can effect change in multiple ways throughout the Union to deal with more specific issues. Only occasionally do treaties specify which
Regulation
Binding in its entirely and directly within all MS’s. Do not need to adopt legislation in order for it to be effective same goes for Dualist and Monist states. Possible need to amend national law for it though
Directives
Binding upon aim achieved, but MS’s are able to do this in any way they see fit. Do not need to be addressed to all MS’s (tend to be) Gives greater flexibility in adaptation with national law. Useful in achieving harmonisation.
Decisions
Binding in their entirety on only those MS’s it addresses. Used in State aid, and competition law. Can be used to establish rules on inter-institional matters.
Recommendations and Opinions
Not binding at all. They are a form of soft law, so constitute more as guidelines for EU law than anything else.