Sotos Syndrome Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is Sotos syndrome?

A

Congenital overgrowth disorder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Incidence of Sotos syndrome

A

1 in 14000

Tatton-Brown & Rahman, 2004

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Genetic mutation in Sotos Syndrome

A

Haploinsufficiency of the nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 1 (NSD1) gene, located on chromosome 5q35

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How many clinically identified cases is the genetic abnormality present in?

A

90%

Tatton-Brown et al. 2005

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Clinical features of SS - cardinal features (Cole & Hughes, 1994)

A

Overgrowth

Macrocephaly
- Height and/or head circumference > 97%

Advanced bone age

Characteristic facial appearance

Intellectual disability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Clinical features of SS - major features

A

Scoliosis

Seizures

Cardiac anomalies

Renal anomalies

Hyperlaxity
- Hypermobility of joints

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Facial appearance of SS

A

Sparse hair

Frontal bossing

Down slanting palpebral (relating to the eyes) fissures

Prominent jaw

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Brain differences in Sotos syndrome

A

Schaefer et al. (1997)

Brain scans of 40 children with Sotos

None of the patients had normal MRI scans

Abnormalities in the corpus callosum (especially posterior)

Enlarged ventricles

Inadequate development of posterior white matter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Conclusions from differences in the brain in Sotos

A

Delayed/disturbed development of the brain, particularly midline structures

Children had normally sized brains in abnormally sized heads

Epilepsy was common

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Lane, Milne & Freeth (2016)

A

Systematic review of Sotos cognitive and behavioural features

Majority of individuals with Sotos have intellectual disability

25 studies assessed cognition using standardised IQ tests

Reported range of IQ scores 21 - 113

Verbal IQ seems to be considerably higher than performance IQ

Specific cognitive abilities are not explored in detail

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Lane, Milne & Freeth (2016) - Language

A

Speech and language delays were reported in 11 studies

Finegan et al. (1994) assessed language in 27 participants with Sotos and matched controls

Found that language abilities were consistent with general level of intellectual functioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Lane, Milne & Freeth (2016) - behavioural issues

A

Behavioural problems were reported in 14 studies (11 of these were case studies)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Behavioural profile

A

Sheth et al. (2015)

Self-injurious behaviour, stereotyped behaviour and destruction of property

Impulsivity and overactivity

Social interaction and impairment

Preference for routine, repetitive questions and repetitive singing/phrases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Methodological considerations of Sheth et al. (2015)

A

Methodology allows for direct comparison between syndrome groups

Are the behaviours specific to Sotos?
- Syndrome-specific behavioural profile is not clear

Behaviours assessed using questionnaires - findings are based on a parental report

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Characteristics of ASD in Sotos syndrome

A

Lane, Milne & Freeth (2017)

Used social responsiveness scale, 2nd edition

78 participants with Sotos syndrome

65 participants (83.33%) made the clinical cut-off for ASD

There were no gender differences

Age increased likelihood into middle childhood/adolescence and then lessens in adulthood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

DSM-5 Subscales in Lane, Milne & Freeth (2017)

A

More severe diagnoses in the repetitive behaviours and restricted interests sub scale

Suggests that in Sotos this is the most problematic of the ASD symptoms

17
Q

Five factors of ASD symptoms (Frazier et al., 2014)

A

Emotional recognition

Social avoidance

Interpersonal relatedness

Insistence on sameness

Repetitive mannerisms

18
Q

Sotos compared to ASD on the five factors

A

Very similar results to ASD (high scores on all factors)

19
Q

Lane et al. (2017) discussion

A

High prevalence of ASD symptomatology in Sotos syndrome

Symptom severity is affected by age but not gender

Clinical implication - clinicians should screen for ASD in Sotos patients

Further evidence for a genetic mechanism associated with ASD

20
Q

Cognitive profile of Sotos Syndrome (Lane, Milne & Freeth, 2018)

A

52 participants used British Abilities Scale (BAS)

  1. 62% = average intellectual ability
  2. 23% = borderline intellectual ability
  3. 15% = intellectual disability

Verbal abilities tended to be higher than non-verbal abilities
- Relative weakness in non-verbal reasoning including quantitative reasoning

Recognition of designs tends to be better than pattern reconstruction abilities
- Relative strength in visuo-spatial memory

21
Q

Sotos considerations

A

Children are larger for their age and so can be mistaken as older and more able than their developmental age

High prevalence of ASD in Sotos

Clear and consistent cognitive profile of strengths and weaknesses
- Could be used to create appropriate educational strategies

22
Q

Systematic review methodology (Lane, Milne & Freeth, 2016)

A

Identification
- Identified 1304 records through database searching

Screening

  • Found 917 records after duplicates were removed
  • Excluded 862 articles as they did not give data on cognition or behaviour

Eligibility

  • Full text articles were assessed for eligibility = 55
  • Excluded 21 as they did not have a means of assessment reported (18), weren’t primary research (2) or weren’t published in English (1)

Included
- Included 34 articles in the systematic review