sociologists names Flashcards
Durkheim(functionalist)
Education system provides secondary socialisation by:
-instilling social solidarity
-teaching social rules and how to abide by them(limiting deviant behaviour)
education teaches universalistic values. mechanical and organic solidarity
Durkheim evaluation
Outdated. Postmodernists argue contemporary society is diverse and multicultural, and schools do not produce a shared set of norms/values.
Hargreaves has argued the education system encourages individualism and competition rather than social solidarity and shared values. Educational norms discourage collaborative learning and instead encourage individuals to try and beat each other-opposite of social solidarity
Davis and Moore(functionalist)
Education facilitates meritocracy- for society to function, there must be a system of unequal rewards(social stratification is essential).
Meritocracy works because of competition-the most important jobs need the most able and determined people and therefore require the most rewards as motivation.
Education system sifts and sorts people into their appropriate roles
Davis and Moore evaluation
Marxist:
-myth of meritocracy
-not based on ability but on social class
Althusser(Marxist)
The education system is part of the ‘ideological state apparatus’. The bourgeoisie maintain power by using:
-repressive state apparatus(coercive power)
-ideological state apparatus(institutions that spread bourgeois ideology and ensure that the proletariat are in a state of false class consciousness)
done via hidden curriculum and formal curriculum
Althusser evaluation
Functionalist: Durkheim’s view that education serves to teach people the norms and values of society, to preserve the value consensus(positive intention)
Post Mod: Althusserian theory is deterministic; the fate of working-class pupils is not determined, and they have the power to change it.
Bowles and Gintis(Marxist)
Correspondence principle:
-Hierarchy, rewards and sanctions, passive and docile, motivation, fragmentation
-reinforces the social class system by teaching w/c to be passive and accept their roles
Bowles and Gintis evaluation
Outdated- research in 1976 and perhaps their findings are more applicable to when they were writing than they are to the present day. After all, the modern workplace is much less like the one described by Bowles and Gintis than the workplaces of the 1970s. Of course there are still factory jobs similar to those described, but a lot of jobs are very different.
pupils aren’t taught to be passive- made more aware of inequalities and exploitation through studying subjects like Sociology
Bourdieu(Marxist)
Cultural capital gives power. Sometimes schools assess cultural capital rather than learning, and teachers perceive cultural capital as intelligence leading to positive labels being applied.
Bourdieu Evaluation
Post Mod: Too deterministic. Assumes people have no real ability to make choices or have control over what happens to them, and they don’t really explain how and why many working-class children are actually successful in education
Bernstein(Marxist)
teachers often have a middle-class habitus. Aspects of w/c habitus can be unconsciously associated with being less academic.
Language codes:elaborate and restricted code
overall, education system assesses children on the extent to which they have a m/c habitus rather than ability or merit
Bernstein Evaluation
School teachers come from a wide range of backgrounds.
It is difficult to generalise about all w/c and m/c families, and there is likely to be a diversity of arrangements in the way language is used in families
Rosen argues Bernstein gives few examples to back up his claims of the existence of restricted and elaborated codes. He accuses Bernstein of creating a myth of the superiority of middle-class speech
Heaton and Lawson(Feminist)
Hidden curriculum teaches patriarchal values and supports gender roles/stereotyping in schools e.g. girls are more likely to do catering
Heaton and Lawson evaluation
-education is an increasingly female-dominated sector
-the education system is increasingly resulting in female success and male underperformance
-there are programmes in place which encourage girls to do more ‘masculine’ subjects- goes against stereotypes
Hargreaves
distinguished three stages of labelling:
1. speculation(teachers make presumptions about the student based on appearance, conformity to discipline, personality, likeability and deviance
2. elaboration(each hypothesis is tested and either confirmed or contradicted, typing of each student is refined)
3. stabilisation(the teacher feels they know the student)
Chubb and Moe(New Right)
Studied attainment of pupils from low income households using parental surveys, statistics and case studies. They found that state education is not meritocratic, as pupils from low-income households were less able to succeed.
Marketisation and privatisation creates competition between schools and this raises standards
Chubb and Moe evaluation
Gewirtz and Ball both argue that competition between the schools mainly benefits the middle class, who can use their cultural and economic capital to gain access to more desirable schools.
Douglas
1964 longitudinal study- Studied the impact of attainment at school and the underachievement of w/c pupils.
He identified that material factors(diet, health, housing) and cultural factors(values, attitudes, language) affected a child’s ability to achieve in school.
e.g. w/c parents place less value on education and as a result were less ambitious for their children and gave them less support/opportunities
Sugarman
Argues that w/c subculture has four key features that act as a barrier to educational achievement:
1. Fatalism(the mentality that nothing could change their status)
2. Collectivism( the w/c valued being part of a group rather than achieving individually)
3. Immediate gratification (demanding rewards, rather than waiting for rewards of better quality
later)
4. Present-time orientation (WC individuals view the present as more important than the future)
Sugarman evaluation
Functionalist theorists blame the working class parents for the underachievement of their children whereas these parents are really the victims of an unequal society in which schools are run by the middle classes for the middle classes.
Elwood
Gender differences in achievement are shaped by six factors:
1. Equal opportunities policies
2. Positive role models
3. GCSE’s and Coursework
4. Teacher attention and classroom interaction
5. Challenging stereotypes
6. Selection and league tables