sociological theory Flashcards
Durkheim
Concerned by rapid social change. from traditional to a complex modern society
- traditional society
- modern society
- rapid change
- social facts
Durkheim: traditional society
little division of labour
members fairly alike
strong collective conscience that bound them so tightly, that individuals did not really exists
Durkheim: modern society
complex division of labour
promotes differences between groups
weakens solidarity
greater individual freedom must be restricted to reduce extreme egoism from destroying all social bonds
Durkheim: rapid change
undermines old norms without creating new ones
throws people into a state of anomie
threat to social cohesion
Durkheim: social facts
society is a separate entity that exists over and above its members
system of external social facts shaping behaviour to serve society’s needs
Parsons Organic analogy
society is constructed of self regulating organisations that are inter-related and interdependent
Individuals have needs to be met if they are to survive i.e. adequate socialisation
Function of any part of the system contributes to society
Parsons consensus and social order
social order is achieved through a central value system/ shared culture - set of norms and values, beliefs and goals (this is a value consensus)
Parsons integration of the individual
value consensus makes social order possible by integrating individuals into the social system and directing them to the system’s needs
mechanisms that make us conform to chared norms;
1.Socialisationss - family, education, work
2.Social contol - positive sanctions, rewards,
ensure individuals are orientated towards pursuing society’s shared goals
Parsons parts of the social system
norms- govern individual’s actions
status-roles-tell us how the occupant of a status should act
institutions-clusters of status roles
sub-systems-groups of related institutions i.e. shops, farms, factories, banks = economic sub system
The social system- groups of sub systems that together make up a social system
Parsons types of society
traditional- ascribed statuses, immediate gratification, collective orientation
modern- achieved status, norms are universalistic, deferred gratification emphasised, individualistic orientation
Parsons social change
structural differentiation - gradual process in which separate functionally specialised institutions develop, meeting a different need
Merton’s internal critique of functionalism
wrong to assume society is always smooth-running, well-integrated.
- Indispensability: parson sees everything as indispensable but Merton argues this is an untested assumption and there may be alternatives.
- Functional unity: parsons claims all parts of society are tightly integrated so change in one part will have a much wider impact. In modern society there are many parts, some only distantly related with functional autonomy
- Universal functionalism: parsons sees everything as having a positive function yet some things that are functional for some are dysfunctional for others i.e poverty
Merton’s manifest versus latent functions
manifest (intended) functions
latent (unintended) functions
distinction between these reveal connections between social phenomena that the actors may be unaware of
i.e. Hopi Indian rain dance’s manifest function was to prevent rain but latent function was to promote social solidarity during hardship caused by drought
External critique of functionalism (logical)
- Teleology: things exists for the purpose of function. i.e. family exists to socialise children - thus it explains the existence of the family in terms of its effect
- Unfalsifiability: functionalism is unscientific as its claims are are not falsifiable. Deviance is seen as both functional and dysfunctional which can never be disproved.
External critique of functionalism (conflict perspective)
Marxism: 'shared' values are not agreed but imposed on society in interests of the dominant class Conflict theorists: conservative ideology, legitimating the status quo i.e. assumptions of indispensability