Sociological Determinants of Health Flashcards
How to define health
Health is socially constructed through the body and interaction, although our focus is on sociological way of thinking; it is social, political, organizational, and commercial
Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion (n.d.) health definition
- A state of complete physical, mental and social well-being, and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity
- It is a culmination of physical, mental, social & personal capacities
- Individual responsibilities to create environment that endorses wellness
Salutogenic model of health
- Can help us in defining health and illness better
- Through this perspective, we can start to understand good health as sustainable wellness (good health, quality of life, etc.)
- Brings an understanding of not just how people are sick but also the ways in which they are and stay healthy
Wellness
A concept that incorporates good health, quality of life, and satisfaction of living conditions
What makes people healthy
1) Health promotion
2) Social Determinants of Health
Health promotion
- This party emphasizes the importance of personal practices
- Under this camp, personal practice is learned through individual health consciousness and places most, if not all, responsibility on the individual to practice good health (ppl have the right, responsibility & freedom to do what is good for their bodies)
- This individual responsibility not only covers behaviours and cultural knowledge (or what bourdieu would describe as cultural capital) to get healthy but also to take preventative/proactive behaviours in relation to health (dont smoke, eat full nutritious meals)
Cultural capital
- Info gathered of norms & values used for one’s own leverage
- Your responsibility to get info necessary to maintain health
- Very neoliberal
- Neoliberalism does play a key role in health promotion. When forcing ppl to dp things on macro level there is a clash, but when giving ppl the opportunity to do things it goes better.
- Sociologists criticize the amount of responsibility as it often negates the impact of institutions, structures & histories in regards to gaining cultural capital to make informed decision (how accessible is it?)
Social Determinants of Health
- Social determinants of health are the circumstances that people find
themselves in, whether being born into, growing up, or having been placed in systems that directly impact health and illness. (race, class, geographical location, urban vs rural, etc.) Not just social factors - Health goes beyond the control of the individual, structural factors and systematic discriminations can be a disadvantage to health, to health prevention, illness intervention, and death (wholistic social constraints & individual factors)
○ We need to understand people’s resilience to social and physical conditions, whilst also taking into account personal histories with health and behaviour and cultural values regarding to health. - rejects individual (complete) responsibility & stresses the culmination of individual responsibility, structural factors & systemic discrimination that can be a disadvantge to health (illness prevention, intervention & death)
- How ppl view their social determinants factors in which ppl are born, love, grow & die in (may not interact with that aspect of social life affecting their health (+) and/or (-)
Personal Vs Structural
Population Health -> Determinants of Health -> Structural Factors/ Personal Factors
- Combine the two factors to help us understand why people get & stay ill/healthy
- Living in a place with accessible grocery store, park, gym, doctor’s office (structural) -> you are more likely to have access to good health practices with influences (individual/personal)
Structural Factors
Evident at the societal level. Includes
aspects of social environments (Socioeconomic status, gender, race, ability, age, Social support) and
institutional organization (Health care services)
Personal Factors
Evident at the individual level. Includes
genetic make-up and individual beliefs,
values, and personal health practices (Health management (Selfcare, Coping skills) Personal health practices (Healthy lifestyle, Proactive health behaviours)
The Lalonde Report 1974
- Canadian government published the Lalonde report to help determine the health of Canadians.
- Argues that healthcare services are not fundamental to improving health, noted that with economic progress, social threats increase the risk to health and wellness and established four key determinants of health (1974)
- At the time, the report found that to improve the health of Canadians, we must move beyond just investing in the health care sector and from 1974 onward, Canada shifted some of its federal policies from biomedical risks to understanding risks to health as more socially and behaviourally impacted.
4 key determinants of health
- Human Biology
- Lifestyle
- The environment
- Health care systems
Lalonde Report 1986
- Canada followed up with the Achieving Health for All: A Framework for Health Promotion, which emphasized our understanding of health as embracing physical, mental, and social
well-being. - One of the major aspects of this report was the recognition of the first and largest challenge to Canadians and their health: To reduce inequities in health between high- and low-income Canadians.
- The report states a need to pay special attention to resource allocation, especially in communities
who are at high risk of chronic disease, mental illness, and disability. It endorsed the health promotion framework.
Health promotion framework
Refers to health promotion as a multifaceted approach that aims at engaging communities,
governments, and other insitutitions to support individuals making healthy choices and creating
health social and physical environments through coordinated health policy.
Social determinants of health
- Income and Social Status
- Social Networks
- Education and literacy
- Employment and Working conditions
- Social and physical Environments
- Personal Health practices
- Healthy childhood development
- Biology
- Healthcare services
- Gender
- Race and culture
Lifestyle
Education and Literacy, Personal Health Practices, Health Childhood Development
Environment
Social, physical, working conditions
Capital
Income and social status, Employment, Social networks
Social factors
Gender, race and culture
Human Biology
Each person inherits a combination of genes from both parents - and these genes can impact physical and emotional traits. Our biology also interacts with other personal and structural factors that impact the
status of our health
Drawbacks of Biology for population health
- Critics of biology state that biological factors do not explain the large differences in population health
- Biological determinism & Scientific Racism
Biological determinism & Scientific Racism
Draws support from contemporary xenophobia, antisemitism, sexism, colonialism, and imperialism.
History
- Historically, colonial powers have conducted racist based empirical research on people of colour, often conducting such research to justify differential
treatment. - Research feeds into the concept of othering and is compounded by the us-versus-them effect
Othering
A concept that describes the ways in which institutions use mechanisms to highlight minority and/or marginalized groups from the dominant groups.
Us-versus-Them effect
People prefer to surround themselves with people who they consider to be in the ‘us’ group over the ‘them’ group
Eugenics
- Eugenics is the scientifically inaccurate belief and practice of improving the human population through controlled/selective breeding.
- This process involves the limitation or discouragement of procreation from people who are considered less desirable - while encouraging the procreation of desirable people.
- Eugenic ideologies stem from the conclusion that rates of inequity and illness (ex. Poverty, crime, drug
overdoses) occur because of hereditary traits rather than from social organization.
Eugenics origin
Officially coined in 1883 by Francis Galton, an English statistician, demographer, and ethnologist.
Eugenics in Canada
- Assumes that selective reproduction can achieve a colonial Canadian nation-state (The Indian Act (1876))
Eugenics across the globe
Scientists from many fields supported the Eugenics movement, including statistics, economists,
anthropologists, sociologists, geneticists, public health officials, and other members of the general
public.
Most notorious applications of eugenics
- Nazi Germany & the Holocaust
- It is estimated that 70,000 adults and 5,200 children were euthanized.
- In addition, at least 400,000 individuals were victims of forced sterilization.
In the US
- Fear of miscegenation and eugenics was prominent
- Used these fears to introduce anti-immigration policies and sterilization of Black and other immigrant groups.
- Allowed for The Johnson-Reed Act - passed in 1924 - which was a discriminatory immigration
legislation which excluded immigrants from Asia. - Over 60,000 people were sterilized between 1900-1970.