Sociolinguistics Flashcards
What is sociolinguistics?
And alternatively what is the sociology of language?
Hudson, R: Sociolinguistics is the study of language in relation to society.
Coulmas: correlations between language use and social structure.
sociology of language studies society in relation to language, e.g effects of multilingualism on economic development
If an utterance is an ‘act of identity’ (le Page & Tabouret-Keller, 1985), which acts of one’s identity can it express.
age, nation of residence, region of origin, class/profession, sex, ethnic background
How does age affect language use? (General - Hudson, R, Sociolinguistics)
Babies - only hear input from parents & carers.
Children - obsessively conform to older children, so much so that some linguistic behaviours (such as words) repeat themselves in consecutive generations of children, without being used at all by adults.
Adolescents - linguistic foundation is laid. Individualism takes over from conformity leading adolescents to use ever changing slang words which differ from adult speech behaviours. (Cheshire & Milroy, 1993, suggest that peer group pressure is stronger on young people than adults, whereas adults who have professional lives, personal independence and geographic & social mobility have greater variability in social relationships and thus feel more pressure to conform to a societal standard.)
Adults - behaviour far more stable, but still malleable by other sociolinguistic factors.
Old people (see 1974 ing study below) use more non-standard variants than middle aged adults - pressures reduce as they return to a smaller more consistent social network? This said, Laboc (2001) found that in Philadelphia old people did not use non standard variants such as negative concord. Are some of these generational features rather than simply non-standard variants?
Time assignment: two ways to tell the time?
Event based time - units and measurements of time correspond to community actions and rituals
‘Cognitive artefacts’ - arbitrary units and measurements such as days weeks months and hours govern our expression of the time, which correspond to literal artefacts (clocks, calendars).
This may well be influenced by community size & dispersion, as well as complexity. No one timed ritual is shared by everybody in London, let alone every English speaker.
Different ideas of time & directional relation. One language in the video had it related to body (perhaps all events are personal and domestic if there is little contact with mass media etc), japanese future is down (related to script?). Why is ours forward?
‘Official Language’
Is the language / languages used by a specific state for state affairs and expected to be the lingua franca of the population though this is not always the case. It can be written into the constitution as it is in India, or specified in other ways, for example in England, residents wishing to naturalise must speak English, Welsh or Scottish Gaelic.
This creates a dynamic between language and power. For example the administration of justice act in Ireland requiring use of English in court disadvantages those who do not speak English.
How does the study of sociolinguistics from the Chomskyan study of linguistics?
Chomsky argued that linguistic theory is primarily concerned with the ‘ideal speaker-listener’, whatever that is… Sociolinguistics actually studies the variation between the language use of real speaker-listeners.
Micro. vs. Macro. Sociolinguistics?
Micro: how does language structure influence language use, how do varieties and patterns correlate with social attributes.
Macro: attitudes and attachments towards languages (which also correspond to distribution of forms in society)
language shift, maintenance, replacement
Varieties, dialects, accents, languages
Languages are not mutually intelligible. (to varying degrees. and sometimes state politics influences what is said to be a distinct language).
Dialects or varieties are mutually intelligible but distinct varieties of a language. They often exist on continua.
The standard form of a language is arbitrary and the ‘language’ encompasses all varieties.
Accents exclusively refer to the phonetic & phonological variation between dialects.
The fourfold model of standardisation:
Haugen 1996
1) selection - one variety is picked & elevated to standard (for ease, cultural significance, societal associations, etc etc)
2) acceptance - promotion, spread, establishment & enforcement (involving norms, institutions, authorities such as schools and the media), to become standard form.
3) elaboration - where the language lacks resources for all of its functions they are developed.
Academie Francaise introduces alternatives to anglicisms, German incorporates anglicisms.
4) codification - the norms and rules of grammar, orthography etc are formulated and defined in grammars, dictionaries, style manuals.
Assignment 2: laryngealisation rates - key findings.
Conversational Data:
Used by men more than women.
Used by working class more than middle class.
Used by younger speakers more than older speakers.
These second two trends are far less obvious amongst men.
Word List Data:
Less usage overall.
Middle class speakers show the greatest reduction in usage.
Implications:
Not a prestige feature
Innovation occurred in a male environment?
Overt vs Covert Prestige
Overt prestige involves conforming to standard, prestigious speech behaviours. Covert prestige involves intentionally straying from standard speech behaviours to mark difference.
COVERT PRESTIGE STUDY: Martha’s Vineyard (Labov, 1963)
Martha’s Vineyard is an island off Massachusetts which had 6000 inhabitants but accommodated 42000 summer visitors each year. Residents had a long record of resistance to norms and culture of Boston.
They also had a differing pronunciation of /aʊ/ (as in ‘house’), pronouncing instead [əu], a pronunciation which only became more frequent and exaggerated despite its lack of prestige.
Labov linked this change to the natives’ resentment towards the invading holiday makers from the mainland (which represented economic exploitation).
This idea is compounded by the fact that the feature was most marked among young speakers who had worked on the mainland and then returned, aware of the social significance of their pronunciation. It was least marked among those who wanted to leave for the mainland.
LANGUAGE & SOCIAL CLASS STUDY: New York Department Stores (Labov, 1966)
The idea is that prestige variants correspond to behaviours of the socioeconomically successful strata of society.
Labov visited three New York department stores, linked to differing classes. He triggered staff members to say the word ‘fourth’ in both casual and emphatic contexts.
He found that postvocalic /r/ was more frequent at the higher class establishments and more frequent in emphatic speech.
Problems:
- unreliable way to judge class of speaker
- possible accommodation of interviewer’s speech.
LANGUAGE & SOCIAL CLASS STUDY: Variation in Norwich (Trudgill, 1974)
The idea is that standard/prestige variants are used more in formal speech, and more by higher classes.
Trudgill studied the following features:
- the percentage of n’ as opposed to ng in walking, running, etc.
- the percentage of glottal stops as opposed to t in words such as butter, bet, etc.
- the percentage of dropped hs’ as opposed to h in words such as hammer, hat, etc
When style is kept constant, the lower the social class the greater the incidence of the non-standard variant • When the social class is kept constant, the less formal the style, the greater the incidence of the non-standard variant
Prestige, Standard, Formality, Class, Reading
The ‘standard’ form of the language gains prestige, as those seeking ‘overt prestige’ conform to the standard. These groups tend to be of higher classes and as such non-standard variants tend to appear among lower class groups. Speakers conform to the standard to a greater extent in formal speech situations or when reading.