Socialism Flashcards
What is collectivism?
Collectivism maintains that humans can achieve their political, social and economic objectives more effectively through collective action. It also suggests that society can only be transformed by collective endeavour.
Arguments for collectivism
Human nature:
humans are social creatures with a natural tendency to work together to achieve their goals, tied together by the bonds of fraternity.
Society:
• The interests of the group (for example, society or community) should take priority over individual self-interest.
• People are defined by the social groups they belong to, so membership of a community/society offers fulfilment.
The economy:
Collective endeavour utilises the economic potential of society more efficiently than wasteful competitive individual effort.
The state:
Collective action via the state ensures a fairer distribution of goods and services (via state intervention and state planning) than free-market forces.
Collectivism in practice
Different strands of socialism vary in their commitment to collectivism.
Marxists:
Marxists advocated collective action based on the principle of ‘from each according to ability, to each according to need’ (for example, the communist regimes of the USSR and North Korea).
Revisionist socialists:
Revisionist socialists accept some degree of free-market capitalism and pursue collectivism in a more limited way (for example, the 1945-1951 UK Labour government nationalised key industries but left much of the economy in private hands),
What is common humanity
Socialists see humans as social creatures with a tendency for cooperation, sociability and rationality. The individual cannot be understood without also by reference to society, because human behaviour is determined by people’s place in society.
Arguments for common humanity
Cooperative effort
Humans are naturally inclined to work together for the common good because cooperative effort:
• produces the best results for society
• enables people to form connections based on respect, understanding and mutual support
• is superior to capitalist competition which sets
One person against another and undermines our common humaniby.
Moral motivation
Humans can be driven by a desire to contribute to the betterment of society
For example, cooperative effort to boost economic growth increases living standards for the working population and provides the funds (through taxation) to finance welfare
measures
Example of collectivism
Example of collectivism
The cooperative movement began in Britain with the Rochdale Society of Equitable Pioneers (1844).
Cooperatives are voluntary associations designed to provide economic assistance for their members They are owned and run by workers or consumers (rather than investors), who benefit in the form of shared earnings or cheap goods secured through the cooperative.
Sig of equality within socialism
The pursuit of social equality or equality of outcome is, arguably, the fundamental value of socialism.
Equality underpins most areas of socialist thought.
Two key principles on which equality is based
- Social equality/equality of outcome: the equal distribution of economic rewards such as income and wealth.
- Egalitarianism: a theory or practice (best viewed in a relative sense) designed to remove or reduce inequalities and ensure everyone has a fair chance in life.
Revolutionary socialist position on equality
The state: revolutionary socialists demand absolute equality (in terms of material rewards and life opportunities), the abolition of private property and replacement with common ownership of all means of production.
Social democrat position on equality
Economy: social democrats call for the relative equalising of society within a reformed capitalist economy via welfare measures, government spending and progressive taxation to remove absolute poverty.
Human nature: material incentives continue to play an important role in human motivation, and greater emphasis is placed on equality of opportunity.
Arguments in favour of equality
• Ensures fairness: economic inequality is due to the structural inequalities in capitalist society, rather than innate differences of ability among people.
• Reinforces collectivism, cooperation and solidarity: human beings are more likely to co-exist harmoniously and work together for the common economic good if they share the same social and economic conditions.
• Satisfies basic human needs: the more equal distribution of wealth and resources, via the redistributive state, will promote human fulfilment and realise human potential.
What is common ownership?
Socialists argue that common ownership of the means of production ensures that all can participate and benefit. They argue that wealth is created by communal effort so it should be owned collectively.
Conversely, private property encourages materialism and the false belief that personal wealth will bring fulfilment. It also generates social conflict between ‘have’ and ‘have not’ groups.
Equality of outcome and who supports
People’s experiences of society should be more or less the same.
Associated with social equality and economic equality.
Do: fundamentalist
socialists, who reject capitalism.
Don’t: social democrats and the Third Way as artificial social and economic levelling.
Absolute equality and who supports
Everyone who contributes to society will receive the same rewards.
Over time, each person’s contribution will be roughly equal.
Do: Marxists, who support communism.
Don’t: social democrats and the Third Way as impractical and
potentially destabilising.
Equality of opportunity and who supports
Everyone has an equal chance to make the best of their abilities, with no artificial barriers to progress for those who work hard and have ability and talent.
Do: The Third Way (see page
62) on meritocratic grounds.
Don’t: Marxists because it does not remove capitalism.
Social democrats who support greater social equality/justice.
Universal welfare and who supports
Inevitably, human society is unequal.
However, all individuals have an equal minimum standard of living guaranteed by state welfare provision.
Do: social democrats as it protects the most vulnerable.
Don’t: Marxists because it does not remove capitalism. The Third Way as they support targeted welfare.
Social Class
Socialists believe that members of a social class share similar outlooks and aims. Social classes are therefore the principal agents of change.
Socialism is ideologically committed to represent the interests of, and improve conditions for, the working class.
Workers’ control
Socialists use the term ‘workers’ control’ in two ways:
• The complete or partial ownership of an enterprise (such as a factory, company or workshop) by employees, including real decision-making powers.
• Control of the state by the workers - a wider and more political concept.
Marxist view on class
A person’s class position is economically determined by their relationship to the means of production. Conflict is inevitable between the owners of productive wealth (the capitalists/bourgeoisie) and those who sell their labour to survive (the working class/proletariat). The ruling bourgeoisie use the state apparatus (the political and legal system) to maintain their dominance. Eventually, class conflict leads to a proletarian revolution, which overthrows capitalism, resulting in a classless, equal society and the state withers away.
Social democrat view on class
They define social class more flexibly, emphasising income and status differences between non-manual and manual occupational groups. Socialist objectives can be achieved through targeted government intervention to narrow (but not remove) class distinctions. The state provides welfare and redistribution schemes to reduce class inequalities.
Untike Marxists, social democrats advocate class consensus in society and peaceful social improvement
Reasons for decline of socialism-working-class link
In recent decades, the connection between socialist ideology and working-class politics has weakened considerably because of;
• deindustrialisation, which has reduced the size of the working class and weakened the trade-union movement
• the rise of the post-industrial service and information economy, together with an expanding middle class.
Consequently, moderate socialist political parties have adapted their programmes to appeal to non-manual workers.