Social psychology midterm 2 Flashcards
what are Attitudes ?
- Our enduring evaluation of people, objects, or ideas.
2. Consist of three components: affective,cognitive, and behavioural component
what are affective-based attitudes? emotionally based attitudes are typically:
attitudes based on our feelings and values. Emotionally-based attitudes are typically:
i. not based on rational examination of the topic;
ii. not governed by logic;
iii. difficult to change.
what are cognitive-based attitudes?
cognitive attitudes are based primarily on factual information about the target object. Typically:
i. involves rational examination of object quality
ii. helps us decide the worth of the object based on cost-benefit analysis.
what are behavioural-based attitudes?
Based on self-perception of one’s own behaviour when the initial attitude is weak or ambiguous. Can be easily influenced by situational factors
what are explicit attitudes? They are typically (3 things)
are attitudes we consciously endorse and can easily report. They are typically:
- a result of high-effort thinking,
- based on recent experiences, and
- more cognitively based.
what are implicit attitudes? they are typically (3 things)
Implicit attitudes are involuntary, uncontrollable, and at times unconscious. The are typically:
- a result of automatic thinking,
- based on childhood experiences
- more affect based
what is the theory of planned behavior?
a theory that the best predictors of a persons planned, deliberate behaviours are:
- the persons attitudes toward specific behaviours
- subjective norms
- perceived behavioural control
According to Fishbein and Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour, when do attitudes predict behaviors?
- The attitude in question is specific to the behavior we try to predict.
- The behavior is executed in a planned and deliberative manner.
- When social constraints are minimal.
i. The behavior is in line with the person’s subjective norms given the situation (i.e.: there are not social pressures for the person to act in ways that contradict his/her attitude).
ii. The ease with which the person can execute the behavior.
What is persuasive communication?
Persuasive communication is defined as communication advocating a particular side of an issue.
What is the Yale Attitude Change Approach and what does it focus on?
a. The most recognized approach to studying persuasive communication and attitude change.
b. Focuses on determining the persuasiveness of a communication by evaluating:
i. The source of the communication: Speakers who are credible, trustworthy, attractive, or likeable are more persuasive than those who are not.
ii. The communication itself: Quality of the argument, one-sided versus two-sided argument, whether you should present your argument first or last, etc.
iii. The type of audience: Their knowledge about the topic, whether they are being distracted, their age, etc.
What do the heuristic-systematic persuasion model (HSPM) and the elaboration likelihood model (ELM) both specify?
They both specify when people are influenced by message content and when they are influenced by superficial characteristics of the message.
when is message content most important?
a) the audience are motivated to learn about the facts,
b) the audience have the ability to pay attention to the facts
c. ) the facts are presented clearly and with good logic.
Persuasion through attending to message content is called systematic processing (HSPM) or central route to persuasion (ELM).
when is the superficial quality of the persuasion (length of message, and attractiveness of speaker, etc.) is more important?
- the message is jargon-filled
- the audience are under cognitive load, and
- when the audience are already in favor of the direction of the message.
Persuasion through superficial message characteristics is called heuristic processing (HSPM) or peripheral route to persuasion (ELM).
Compared to attitude changes that take place through peripheral routes, changes that take place through the central route are: (3 things)
- more likely to last over time
- more resistant to counter-persuasion, and
- more likely to predict actual behaviors
Fear-arousing communications are most effective if the message:
- induces a moderate amount (and not an intense amount) of fear.
- provides the audience with methods they can use to reduce the fear.
For those who find the fear message too overwhelming, a bit of humor can reduce the threat and induces greater attitude change.