Social Psychology Exam 2 Flashcards
Chapter 7
Attitudes, Behaviors, and Rationalization
Influence of Attitudes on Behaviors
Weaker than most people suspect
Influence of Behaviors on Attitudes
Stronger than most people suspect
Attitude
Evaluation of an object along a positive-negative dimension.
Involve Affects (emotion)
Involves Cognition (Thoughts that reinforce a person’s feelings)
Involves Behaviors (Rewarding objects we should approach and punishing objects we should avoid)
Likert Scale
Lists a set of possible answers with anchors on different extremes (for example, 1- Strongly Disagree, 7-Strongly Agree). Very limited, as they don’t capture depth of people’s beliefs
Accessibility of Attitude
How readily attitude comes to mind. To measure this a person’s response latency- the time it takes a person to respond to an attitude question- is tracked. Shorter amount of time to answer a question about something typically means stronger attitude
Centrality of Attitude
Variety of measures within a particular domain are measured and their strength when compared to attitudes of other things in that domain are calculated. (For example, measuring someone’s attitude on abortion then measuring their attitude on sex education in school)
Implicit Attitude Measures
More discreet ways of taking measurements when people seem unable to give self-reports. Used to tap into people’s nonconscious attitudes. Two methods used, affective priming and implicit association test.
Physiological Indicators of Attitudes
Another way to measure attitudes, for example sweat on palms or brain patterns
LaPiere’s Study: Do attitudes predict behavior?
Toured US with young Chinese couple in 1930s. Only turned away by one establishment but when asking afterwards whether they would serve Asians 90% of restaurants said no. Shows that attitudes don’t really predict behavior that well.
Other determinants may affect behavior rather than attitudes
Like it says, for example social circumstances or other reasons. (Maybe the Asian couple in LaPiere’s study weren’t turned away because the restaurant owners were worried about the scene it would cause)
Study about evaluating person you’re dating
A study was conducted in which people were placed in two groups, either give an overall evaluation of the person you’re dating, or give reasons why you feel the way you do then give an overall evaluation. Nine months later the people in the first group were more accurate predictors. Coming up with all the other bullshit can mislead us in terms of our full, true attitude
Introspecting about reasons for attitudes
Undermine how well those attitudes guide our behavior. We find easy things to list off instead of considering the real reasons we like or dislike something
Generality vs Specificity of Assessing Behaviors
If you want to determine a specific type of behavior accurately, you have to measure people’s attitudes towards that specific behavior
John B the gay guy
Study where people weren’t willing to show John B around campus only if he fit their stereotype of a gay man, if he didn’t then they were cool with it
Cognitive Consistency Theories
Maintain that the impact of behavior on attitudes reflects powerful tendency we have to justify or rationalize our behavior and minimize inconsistencies between our attitudes and actions
Cognitive Dissonance Theory
Theory that an aversive emotional state is aroused when there is an inconsistency between two cognitions. We will typically expend psychological cognitive energy to restore consistency
Dissonance and decision making
Before making an irreversible decision, people are more likely to try and reduce dissonance. An example of this is with horse betting. While waiting in line to bet, people mostly rated their horse as having a ‘fair’ chance of winning, others rated their horse as having a ‘great’ chance at winning. Can take place both before and after a decision is made.
Effort justification
Expending mental energy to justify something you just did. For example if you bought something super expensive and it turned out to be shit, you’ll try to convince yourself that it was worth it
Sex group discussion experiment
Experiment where groups of women were told they would be engaging in a discussion about sex. Before the ‘discussion,’ they had to do a screening. Three separate groups, one repeated innocuous words to the experimenter, one group repeated mildly embarrassing sexual words, and the third more severe group read straight up porn and shit. After the super ‘boring’ discussion about sex, the group that underwent the more severe condition reported more favorably of the discussion, meaning they tried to reduce dissonance more.