Social psychology and Clinical decision making Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define conformity

A

Adjustment of individual behaviours, attitudes and beliefs to a group standard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What factors influence conformity

A

Group size : Conforming increase with group size, but this stops at 5 members and doesn’t increase past this
Presence of dissenter : One person disagreeing will decrease conforming
Culture : Increase in collectivistic cultures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe a key study on conformity

A

Asch conformity experiment
A test of line length is given to the group with one being a test subject and the rest being part of the experimental team, when the experimental team said a wrong answer the test subject went along with what they were saying even though they could see that the group was wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define obedience

A

Compliance with commands given by an authority figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the influencing factors of obedience

A

Remoteness of the victim
Closeness/legitimacy of the authority figure
Diffusion of responsibility : obedience increases when someone else takes the blame

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe the Milgram obedience study

A

One learner and one teacher
An actor is placed in a fake electric chair and asked memory questions
The participant is asked to administer electric shocks whenever they get a question wrongs with increasingly worse shocks
They were told to perform the shocks in different ways first “you can shock them” proceeding up to “Shock them or you’ll die”
Even at lethal doses/when the actor appeared unconscious or dead they kept going

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define social loafing

A

Social loafing is a tendency for people to expend less individual effort when part of a team than when alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the influencing factors of social loafing

A

More likely to occur if:
- Person thinks they’re not being monitored
- Task/group has less meaning for the person
- The person isn’t very motivated
- The person expects that they will be carried by the other members
Depends on:
- Gender: Occurs more in all-male groups
- Culture: Occurs more in individualistic cultures
Disappears when:
- Individual performance is monitored
- Members value their goal a lot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define groupthink

A

The tendency for a group to not think critically because they are trying to reach a decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the influencing factors of group think

A

Most likely to occur when a group:

  • Is under stress to reach a decision
  • Is isolated from outside input
  • Has a directive leader
  • Has a lot of cohesiveness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define group polarisation

A

The tendency for people to make decisions that are extreme just because they’re in a group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the steps to the process of the bystander effect

A

Notice event
Decide if it’s an emergency (Social comparison to see how others react)
Assume responsibility to intervene OR diffuse responsibility
Self-efficacy to deal with situation (so lack thereof = less likely to help)
Decision to help (occurs based on a cost-benefit analysis)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How do you overcome the bystander effect

A

Reduce restraints on helping
- Reduce ambiguity and increase responsibility
- Enhance guilt and concern for self image
Social altruism:
- Teaching moral inclusion
- Modelling helpful behaviour
- Attributing helpful behaviours to altruistic motive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the 3 styles of leadership and what are the advantages and disadvantages

A

Autocratic - All decision making is done by one person
- Pros : Enables quick decision making and a clear hierarchy of responsibilty
- Cons : Can be demotivating and lead to errors
Democratic - Favours group decision making, with leader instructing after consulting the group
- Pros : Can win cooperation and motivate team and can improve quality of decision making
- Cons : Time-consuming and can lead to disagreements
Laissez-Faire - “Free-reign” style where a leader doesn’t lead but allows others to make decisions
- Pros : Allows autonomous working and allows expertise to be utilised
Cons : Can lead to lack of direction and lack of ultimate responsibility holder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is conformity bias

A

The tendency to search for, interpret and recall info in a way that confirms pre-existing beliefs often leading to errors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the sunk cost fallacy

A

The more you have invested in something (time, money, etc) the more you want to prove it and the harder it is to abandon

17
Q

What is representativeness heuristics

A

Putting someone/thing in a category that fits the prototype we have in our head of what it should be like and ignore facts that contradict this
Clinically this can result in neglect and error in diagnosis

18
Q

What is availability heuristics

A

Probabilities are estimated on the basis of how easily we can recall cases
e.g. if you’ve just seen a rare disease you’re more likely to look for it again in a similar presentation

19
Q

What are the strategies for improving clinical decision making

A

Education and training :
- Integrate teaching about cognitive error and diagnostic error into med school curriculum
- Recognise heuristics and biases may affect our judgement even though we may not be conscious of them
Feedback :
- Increase number of autopsies
- Conduct regular and systemic audits
- Follow up patients
Accountability :
- Establish clear accountability and follow-up for decisions made
Generating alternatives :
- Establish forced consideration of alternative possibilities (e.g. differential diagnoses)
Consultation :
- Seek second opinions, use algorithms (provides best answer based on evidence) and clinical decision-making support systems