Social Psychology Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Milgram’s Variation 7 Procedure

A

The procedure was the same aside from the location of the experimenter. Instead of being given verbal prods the participants would have to telephone the experimenter if they wanted to leave the study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Milgram’s Variation 7 Results

A

The results fell from 65% to 22.5%. Participants were able to lie about increasing the shocks and continued to give low level shocks.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Milgram’s Variation 7 Conclusion

A

This variation shows that the proximity to an authority figure has an impact on obedience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Milgram’s Variation 10 Procedure

A

The procedure remained the same but the experiment was moved from Yale to a small commercial office in Bridgeport. It was conducted in a run down commercial building with 3 sparsely furnished rooms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Milgram’s Variation 10 Results

A

48% of participants still went up to 450V. Participants questioned the credentials of the company.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Milgram’s Variation 10 Conclusion

A

This variation shows that perceived authority has an impact on obedience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Milgram’s Variation 13 Procedure

A

In this variation, the main experimenter who was sitting in the room with the participant got called away for a phone call during the experiment. When he was gone, another participant (actually a confederate) took his role as the experimenter. This “participant” was not initially introduced to the actual participant as the experimenter, nor was he wearing a lab coat.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Milgram’s Variation 13 Results

A

Only a 20% obedience level.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Evaluation of Milgram’s Studies (Strengths)

A
  • standardised procedures
    *high amount of controls (lab experiment, increased validity)
    *Men from varying jobs and backgrounds increases generalisability.
    *less chance of demand characteristics as the ppts don’t know the study is about obedience.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evaluation of Milgram’s Study (Limitations)

A
  • No informed consent
    *Ppts were deceived
  • Issues with withdrawal due to the 4 verbal prods
    *Lacks ecological validity and mundane realism
    *Very ungeneralizable due to sample being all American men and self-selected.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is an autonomous state?

A

In the autonomous state people use their free will and feel personal responsibility for their actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is moral strain?

A

Moral strain occurs when we are asked to do something we view as morally wrong by an authority figure. It could be described as guilt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is agentic shift?

A

Agentic shift occurs if the authority figure is legitimate or the person knows they will take the blame for any consequences. Agentic shifts stop the feeling of moral strain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the agentic state?

A

In the agentic state we are following the orders of authority figures and do not take responsibility for our own actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Agency theory ao3

A

Milgrams original study-65% went to 450v
Criticism- the concept of agency and autonomy is hard to define

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define divisional effect

A

the more targets there are to impact the harder it is for the source as their strength is divided by the number of targets

17
Q

Define source

A

person giving the order or instructions

18
Q

Define target

A

person being acted upon/following the order

19
Q

Define strength

A

how much power you perceive the person influencing you to have

20
Q

Define number

A

more sources there are the more influential they are

21
Q

Define immediacy

A

how close a person is or how recently the order was given

22
Q

Define psychosocial law

A

each new person increases the impact but has less impact than the person before

23
Q

Define multiplication effect

A

the impact of S,I and N when multiplied is greater than each individual element

24
Q

What is the formula for Impact theory?

A

I=f(SIN)

25
Q

Impact theory AO3

A

The use of a mathematical formula means the results are objective and valid. It allows predictions to be made about levels of impact on society, as long as we can measure the immediacy and size of the group.
It is generalisable to all cultures as it highlights it is an idea present in all groups.
It can be used to explain the results of Milgram’s two peers rebel study and the variation with two teachers.

Disadvantages

It is such a complex idea that involves so many factors that it i shard to believe it can be reduced to a mathematical formula.
It doesn’t look at the recipricol effect, as it is a static theory.
It doesn’t look at individual differences (loci etc.)
It looks at social impact in general and not just at obedience, s can explain why others effect obedience, but not why situation does.
Obedience is the behaviour of an individual in response to another, so SIT only works in group situations.

26
Q

Aim of the social practical

A

to study how obedience differs between males and females

27
Q

Method of the social practical

A

-collect an opportunity sample to answer a short survey
-instruct ppts to answer honestly and that they have 10 minutes to complete the survey
-collect results from ppts and use the data from closed questions to form graphs

28
Q

Social practical results (females)

A

Females
-mean:11
-median:11
-mode:11,12
-range:6
-standard deviation: 1.63

29
Q

Social practical results (males)

A

Males
-mean:10.23
-median: 10
-mode:11
-range:7
-standard deviation: 1.69

30
Q

Qualitative conclusions

A

-females follow orders more thoroughly
-context is important for obedience
-society influences obedience

31
Q

Define inter group conflict

A

states that when two or more groups seeking the same limited resources this will lead to conflict and discrimination between the groups

32
Q

Define zero sum game

A

there can only be one winner which increases levels of prejudice

33
Q

Define superordinate goals

A

mutually desirable goals that cannot be obtained without the participation of two or more groups

34
Q

What does realistic conflict theory assume?

A

people are selfish and will seek to maximise their own rewards

35
Q

Which study supports realistic conflict theory?

A

Sherifs study of prejudice- competition for resources increased inter group conflict. Provides evidence for superordinate goals as when the boys were brought together to solve a common goal it reduced prejudice.

36
Q

How is realistic conflict theory useful?

A

explains prejudice between groups such as Israel and Palestine.Not only explains the cause of prejudice but also how to solve it

37
Q

Weaknesses of Realistic conflict theory

A

• boys were hostile in Sherifs study before competition was introduced. social identity theory is a better explanation
•individual differences aren’t accounted for