Social Psychology Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

A01 of agency theory

A

Agency theory states that when an individual is asked to do something by authority figure, they will switch from autonomous state to agentic state. In the autonomous state they act upon free will. In the agentic state, ppts will act as an agent to the authority figure and follow orders. Moral strain occurs when a person is asked to do something they don’t want to do, this is reduced by switching to the agent state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Supporting evidence of agency theory

A

Milgram study, found that people are more likely to follow orders from an authoritative figure. Many ppts didn’t feel responsible for their own actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Conflicting evidence of agency theory

A

The ordinary man variation found that people don’t always respect their authoritative figure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Other explanations of agency theory

A

Milgrams variation and social impact theory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Usefulness of agency theory

A

Explains why people follow orders and the process behind hierarchy. Eg. German soldiers in ww2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Test ability of agency theory

A

Milgrams research is standardised and therefore reliable. Low in internal validity.
Autonomous state and a Gentic state cannot be measured in empirical way (subjective and not scientific)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Weakness of agency theory

A

Assumes all societies are in a hierarchy and those at the bottom follow orders, this doesn’t explain why those at the top would follow an order. Therefore cannot explain every case of obedience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Burger A01

A

Replicated Milgrams study. Screamed out everyone with a mental problem using a questionnaire and a clinical psychologist. Contained 29 men and 41 women. Maximum shock was 150 V. Sample shock was 15 V. Told twice in writing and once verbally they could withdraw but were still given prods.
70% went to 150 V
In the model refusal 63.3% went to 150 V.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Social impact theory

A

Strength- how much power you believe the person influencing you has
Immediacy- how recent the order was given and how close they were to giving you it.
Numbers - The more people putting pressure on you, the more Social force.
Divisional effect- The more targets there are to impact, the less strength authority figure has.
Multiplicative effect- The impact of S I N, multiplied together is greater than an individual element.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Other explanations of Impact theory

A

Agency theory, H: impact theory takes more situational factors into account.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Usefulness of impact theory

A

Useful to real world such as large crowds at football matches

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Supporting evidence for impact theory

A

Sedikides and Jackson - dressed as a zookeeper or a civilian in a zoo and told people to stand back from the rails. Found high strength and high immediacy exerted more impact.
Aronson- conformity will increase as the strength and immediacy increase

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Contradictory evidence for impact theory

A

Mullin- conducted meta analysis of strength and immediacy. Concluded that strength and immediacy were weak and lacked consistency.
Breaking down impact into a basic mathematical formula is reductionist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Sherif et al a01

A

22 boys age 11 from Protestant Oklahoma families were matched with IQ and sporting ability. We’re placed in a summer camp into groups (bears and rattlers). Tournament started good but the two groups began fighting and name-calling “sneak”. Boys took part in raids and began setting other camps on fire. At the end both groups would work together to complete a superordinate goal, such as fixing the camp water.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Strengths of sherif

A

Low in demand characteristics as boys didn’t know they were being studied.
Triangulation of data collection therefore high validity.
Observed and therefore standardised and replicable, so high reliability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Weaknesss of Sherif

A

Field experiment meaning there was some uncontrolled extraneous variables therefore low in validity.
Informed consent was not given and there was no way to withdraw. H: parents gave consent
Sample bias as they were all the same meaning low in generalisability.

17
Q

Sherif generalisability

A

Sample was androcentric, and cannot be applied to females.

All from Oklahoma and had similar IQ is therefore are ethnocentric. No generalisability

18
Q

Sherif reliability

A

Was a field experiment, so EVS cannot be controlled therefore is less repeatable and less reliable.
Stages and tasks were standardised therefore more reliable.
Triangulation of data collection means more reliable

19
Q

Sherif applicability

A

Field experiments so high in ecological validity and can be applied to real life. 
Can use findings to reduce real life prejudiced for example superordinate goals.
Can’t be applied to every case of prejudice for example those which do not include group formation.

20
Q

Sherif validity

A

Field experiment so high in ecological validity and mundane realism.
Triangulation.
Less control over extraneous variables therefore lower in internal validity.

21
Q

Realistic conflict theory a01

A

If there are two or more groups seeking the same limited resources they will be conflict. Assumes people are selfish and trying to maximise their own rewards. In the zero-sum game there can only be one winner this will increase levels of prejudice.  superordinate goals are mutually desirable goals that require teamwork to achieve reducing prejudice.

22
Q

Supporting evidence for RCT

A

Sherif

23
Q

Conflicting evidence for RCT

A

Boys showed prejudice before competition

24
Q

Usefulness of RCT

A

Shows us a way of reducing prejudice through superordinate goals.  ignores individual differences and free Will, therefore deterministic and less credible.
Ignores upbringing. 

25
Q

Test ability of RCT

A

Can be tested through field experiments meaning high in reliability.
Low in internal validity as unsure whether it is an actual measure of prejudice.

26
Q

Results of sherif

A