Social Norm Flashcards
Social Norms
- Defined as an individual’s beliefs about the common and accepted behaviors within a group.
- Can be descriptive (what most people do) or injunctive (what people approve or disapprove of).
Normative Social Influence
- Refers to changes in behavior, attitudes, or beliefs due to the perceived norms of a group.
- Often operates unconsciously, leading individuals to underestimate its impact on their actions.
Behavior Domains & Applications
- Personalized feedback showing discrepancies between perceived and actual norms effectively reduces drinking rates among college students.
- Social norm messaging has successfully reduced water and energy consumption.
- Comparisons of individual usage with neighborhood averages have encouraged reductions in overuse.
- Marketing and advertising leverage norms by highlighting trends, popularity, or collective behavior.
Magnetic Middle Effect
- Highlighting norms can lead individuals below the norm to increase the targeted behavior, but it may also cause those above the norm to regress (boomerang effect).
- Supplementing with social approval or disapproval cues can counter this effect.
Moderators of Effectiveness
- Magnetic Middle Effect
- Personal Values: Normative influence is weaker among individuals with strong personal convictions on the issue.
- Social Identity: Normative messages are more impactful when they align with the norms of an individual’s in-group.
- Cultural Norms: Both individualistic and collectivistic cultures are influenced by norms, though the strength and nature of the influence may vary.
- Trends & Activations: Salient cues
Tightness-Looseness Framework
- Tight Cultures: Strong social norms with low tolerance for deviance. Examples: Pakistan, Singapore, South Korea.
- Loose Cultures: Weak social norms with high tolerance for deviance. Examples: Brazil, Netherlands, United States.
Key Differentiators:
- Social Norms: Tight cultures exhibit strict adherence and enforcement, while loose cultures are more permissive.
- Situational Strength: Everyday social situations in tight cultures are more predictable and regulated compared to those in loose cultures.
Historical and Ecological Roots
- Tightness is linked to societies with greater historical and ecological challenges, such as high population density, resource scarcity, natural disasters, or disease prevalence.
- These conditions necessitate stronger norms to promote cooperation and survival.
Institutional Pattern (Tightness-Looseness)
- Tight cultures often feature restrictive governmental, media, and legal systems with higher levels of monitoring and punishment.
- Loose cultures allow greater freedom and variability in behaviors within institutions and society.
Individual Psychological Profile (T-L)
-
Tight Cultures:
- Emphasize self-regulation and impulse control.
- Higher need for structure and chronic awareness of normative expectations.
- Prevention-focused mindset (avoidance of mistakes and sanctions).
-
Loose Cultures:
- Adaptability to diverse behaviors.
- Lower need for structure and constraints.
Behavioral Patterns:
- People in tight cultures exhibit greater self-monitoring and adherence to normative behaviors.
- In loose cultures, individuals face fewer behavioral restrictions and more flexibility in everyday actions.
Implications & Applications (T-L)
-
Cultural Variation:
- Tightness-looseness is distinct from collectivism/individualism, power distance, and other cultural dimensions.
- Example: Germany (tight and individualistic) vs. Brazil (loose and collectivistic).
-
Practical Relevance:
- Useful in organizational management, policy-making, and intercultural training.
- Helps explain challenges in cross-cultural interactions and adjustments, such as the stress experienced when transitioning between tight and loose cultures.
-
Conflict and Misunderstanding:
- Differences in tightness-looseness often underlie international and intercultural tensions, as these create conflicting views of morality and societal functioning.
Social Norm Correlation
- The impact of the descriptive norm was bigger than the impact of people’s own prior attitude (.18 vs .33)
- People didn’t realize that the descriptive norm was persuasive (between .25 and .40)
Why and when people conform to descriptive to norms
- Need to belong: motivation to act in ways that will be approved of by other people in the local environment
- Need to know: motivation to act in ways that are objectively smart or sensible in the context of the local environment
Implications
- when people feel a stronger “need to belong” (when people worry more about others’ approval) or “need to know” (when people experience more uncertainty) they are more likely to conform
Threats and Conformity
- When people are more worried about threats of various kinds, they are more likely to conform
- Especially when the threat is infectious disease
Culture and Conformity
Individualistic cultures value personal autonomy, self-responsibility, and uniqueness — direct contrast to normative social influence
- A meta-analysis of the research on normative social influence found that experiments conducted in individualistic cultures produced larger effects than experiments conducted in collectivistic cultures
- Lots of evidence has shown that there are stronger conformity pressures, and higher levels of conformity, in collectivistic cultures