social networks Flashcards

1
Q

What did you understand from this postdoc?

A

dual group memberships can be signaled socially
heritage identity & national identity membership
But are they Identified as such?
Self-report and censor data on who’s friends with whom
And use these insights to inform a software programme that measures people’s views on ethnicity and social networks of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

my previous research (overlap)

A

I was interested in the role of contextual factors
on ….
these included classroom variables but also teacher:
multicultural education on peer relationships and motivation to learn.

The theoretical basis of my studies was self-determination theory and contact theory.

–> the role of acknowledging and normalizing identities & cultural elements of minority students in their social and structural integration within the classroom

Ways to improve intergroup relationships and create bridges

Similarly, you want to look at how symbolizing and acknowledging a dual identity affects social relationships within educational contexts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How is it interdisciplinary?

A

looking at educational practices on group processes and motivation
(so educational sciences & social psych)

understand the role of social factors such as SES, and integration/immigration policies
(so sociology)

So i was combining insights from different disciplines

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How do you deal with stressful situations?

A

combining finishing PhD + a new teaching job was quite stressful
I divided my days to not divide my attention
set strict deadlines and kept them

–> external motivation (arranging a vacation)

in general:
I have people that I see as my mentors, and I talk to them about the best course of action to take
Try to not divide my attention too much with too many tasks
make sure to do sports

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Difficult moment collaborating?

A

People don’t always respect the deadlines, they are busy or they forget..

I make sure to have more than 1 thing going on so i can continue working on the other thing

send regular reminders, to not leave things to chance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

My role in this project

A

the delineated tasks
a supervising role for the PhD (like a daily supervisor) but also be supervised by you
(i have multiple students I am supervising, and i teach)

Project management:
everything is delivered on time
The quality of the deliverables meets the standards
Communicating the research findings on a regular basis -perhaps through some small symposia -

get relevant exposure - e.g., about the software program
public engagement and outreach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Papers I have sent

A

to showcase what I know about networks in general
we can use some of the social network metrics as DV’s in regression models
since we are focusing on colleges, we may need to take the nested of the data into account - using multilevel models

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

methodological skills

A

I have interest in learning different complex quantitative analytical tools

    • I have done a lot of different complex analyses during my PhD, so I have the capacity to learn them
    • I always did it myself but I got some methodological input from collaborators

but also qualitative analyses:
discourse analysis, grounded theory, thematic analysis, interview techniques, using the transcription and analysis tools

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

research history

A

research master’s psychology at UvA
got interested in diversity & inclusion because
–> international student myself: rules & norms not very apparent
–> in the middle of the integration debate

What do the Dutch do to accommodate integration?
Educational contexts are where it starts

Wrote a PhD project about it
Got awarded an NWO grant

I first explored the interdependent relationships through a network model
and further tested the emerged hypotheses through directed models

I am currently looking into other organizations & institutions
e.g., ethnic profiling and procedural justice of the Amsterdam police
e.g., the status of diversity and inclusion needs in humanitarian organizations –> because it is interesting for my own work as a self-standing trainer,
I work with humanitarian NGOs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Strengths

A
  • I think I have very good communication and social skills. People find me quite approachable and friendly, which helps me build rapport and form networks
  • I am also good at managing my time and meeting deadlines, also multitasking
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

weaknesses

A
  • take on a lot of different projects
    I find a lot of things interesting, but then I find it hard to turn off work - so maybe saying no or setting boundaries - work-life balance :)
  • I overprepare for things,
    which I think stems from finding public speaking a little intimidating
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why this postdoc?

A

1- I really like the research group ERCOMER

  • because the topics we focus on are complex, therefore it requires a holistic approach
  • using robust research methods that can accommodate the complexity of the problem
  • I can learn new methods, but also can bring new ones that would fit the vision of the research programme

2- I like the topics you focus on

  • diversity is not an exception but a norm
  • but we still see a lot of segregation and friction
  • I am interested in understanding factors that drive and mitigate this division between people
  • Because the need to belong and feel like you have -meaningful connections is a basic psychological need for humans

3- this particular project

  • I will learn to visualize and study the interpersonal relationships I was researching about
  • Friendships in particular have the potential in improving attitudes
  • I find mixed methods studies a little more complete in providing meaningful insights

-I was developing my own research line to apply for a grant: I am interested in seeing the interplay between different domains of acculturation - and this project already focuses on some aspects of this project i was working on

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

their papers

A

Design architecture, nudging —> making things easier for the respondents, to get more accurate and complete results, keeping responder motivation

I also really liked the triangulation used in Zsofia’s paper, because of course, people may report on the more immediate friends or encounters based on what’s more salient at the moment, but rather more brief encounters also have an effect, which can be seen through the sensors, GPS data

Low network density - if people forget to put a tie —> why not the default all ties present and people take out ties if they are not present?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

my questions

A

Do you want to further develop the social network software GENSI or want to develop a new one?
How do you envision the ERC team working together?
Will I be supervising the PhDs? There seem to be no teaching duties right?
What are some Project management tasks?
How often do people come to the office? After corona
When will I hear from you?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

We can we do on the side?

A

we can combine social and psychometric network insights

we can build for instance psychometric networks using social network metrics as variables that vary across individuals (for instance their in and outbound connections), the frequency of contact with outgroup members, their general attitudes towards outgroup and so on

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Main findings from my phd

A

ME good for both minority and majority group peer relationships & motivation

different aspects of ME is beneficial for different groups

the effect of these different aspects can change based on intergroup context

whether teachers deliver it well

highlight similarities next to acknowledging differences

17
Q

why effect of explicit and not implicit?

A

students may not pick up on the implicit subtle ques
teachers might be aware and have suppressed them
IAT is not very valid?

18
Q

explicit measures

A

implicit measures predict –> spontaneous beh.
explicit measures predict –> planned beh.

implicit attitudes previously found to not predict engaging in culturally responsive teaching

SO

when we looked at whether teachers would engage in ME and how –> we used explicit measures

BUT

when we looked at it’s effects on students, we also used implicit measures