Social Influence L3 - Key Studies In Conformity Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Studies for NSI and ISI

A

ISI
Jenness (1932)
Sherif (1935)

NSI
Asch (1951)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Jenness’ Aim

A

To examine whether individuals will change their opinion in an ambiguous situation, in response to group discussion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Jenness’ Method

A
  • glass bottle full of 811 white beans
  • sample of 26 students who guessed how many beans in the bottle (on their own)
  • divided into groups of 3 and asked to provide estimate through discussion
  • then afterwards on their own they were asked again to see if they changed their answers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Jenness’ results

A
  • nearly all participant changed answers from the original one when given second chance to estimate on their own
  • answers stated to converge in groups
  • second individual answers were closer to group discussion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Jenness’ results (stats)

A
  • On average male participants changed their answer by 256 beans and women by 382 beans
  • the range of the whole group went from 1875 before discussion to 474 after - decrease of 75%
  • shows converging opinions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Jenness’ conclusion

A
  • results show change due to ISI as they believed that the group estimates were more likely to be correct in comparison to our own
  • looked to others for support as they had a need to be right and weren’t sure if they were right
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Asch want to explore?

A
  • Wanted to see what would happen when people were confronted with a majority who were wrong
  • Gave easy task so that if the participant gave the wrong answer it would be due to group pressure
  • study also known as ‘Asch effect’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Asch’s aim

A
  • investigated the extent to which social pressure from a majority group could affect a person to confirm
  • investigate the degree to which individuals would conform to a majority who gave obviously wrong answers in a non-ambiguous situation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Who took part in Asch’s experiment

A

123 male US undergraduates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the size of the group and who was in them

A
  • groups of 6-8
  • only one real participant, rest were confederates (agreed on answer in advance)
  • real participant the last one, or next to last
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What type of experiment was it

A

Lab experiment - conducted in controlled environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How many trials were there

A
  • 18 trials (for each participant)
  • 12 trials were critical - where confederates gave the wrong answer
  • 6 were real trials
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Independent and dependent variable (Asch)

A

(IV) - Manipulating critical trial, confederates giving wrong answer
(DV) - To see if participant conforms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the control group

A
  • no confederates, only real participants
  • 36 participants with 20 trials
  • error rate of 0.04% - 3 out of 720
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Asch’s results

A
  • on average in critical trials about a third (32-36%) confirmed to clearly incorrect majority
  • over 12 critical trials, about 75% conformed at least once, 25% never conformed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Asch’s conclusion

A
  • he interviewed participants after to give reasons for answers:
  • most said they knew answers were wrong but went along with group to fit in/ thought they would be ridiculed
  • some started doubting their own views
  • confirms compliance due to NSI and the desire to fit in publicly without changing private views
  • participants wanted to be liked rather then right