Social influence- important stuff Flashcards
What is informational social influence?
When someone conforms to be right and assumes that the group knows best. It is also usually long lasting and leads to internalisation.
What is normative social influence?
When someone conforms to be liked or accepted by the group. It usually leads to a temporary change and leads to compliance.
Research for informational social influence.
Lucas et.al found that participants conformed more often to incorrect answers they were given, when the maths problems were difficult.
Research for NSI.
Asch interviewed his participants and some said that they conformed because they felt self-conscious giving the correct answer.
However, when participants wrote their answers down, conformity fell to 12.5%. This is because they were not subject to group pressure.
What is internalisation?
A type of conformity where a person publicly and privately accepts the behaviours and norms of the group.
The change is usually permanent.
What is identification?
A type of conformity where a person takes on the majority view because they accept it as correct only in the presence of the group.
Public attitudes change but not private.
What is compliance?
A type of conformity where a person goes along with the group publicly but their private views don’t change.
What are the three variables that Ssch changed in his study to measure conformity?
Group size- He varied the umber of confederates from 1 to 15. He found that conformity increased as group size increased but only to 3 confederates then levelled off.
Unanimity- In one variation Asch gave the participants a confederate who believed in their views. This caused conformity to decrease.
Task difficulty- he increased the difficulty of the line- judging task by making the lines closer to the control line. He found the conformity increased.
Limitation of Asch’s study.
The task and situation were artificial. Participants knew that they were in a study and may have tried to skew the results. (demand characteristics).
All the participants were American men- gender bias. Also may not be able to generalise across cultures. Individualistic vs collectivist.
Strength of Asch’c study.
Support from other research by Lucas et al.
He asked his participants to solve easy and hard maths problems. participants were given answers from three other students.
It was found that the participants conformed more often when the maths was harder.
Strength of Zimbardo’s SPE.
There was high control over variables.
Only emotionally-stable participants were chosen and randomly assigned to roles.
This increased the interval validity of the study, so we can be much more confident about drawing conclusions about the influence of roles of conformity.
Limitations of Zimbardo’s SPE.
It did not have realism of a true prison. Some psychologists argued that the prisoners were acting rather than conforming to a role.
This could explain why the prisoners rioted.
Lacks population validity as all of the participants were American males so can’t generalise to all genders and cultures.
Ethical issues- deception, protection from harm- stress, anxiety, emotional harm.
Strength of Milgram’s study.
Highly replicable
Participants were thoroughly debriefed on the aims of the study.
High internal validity- 70% of the participants believed that the electric shocks were real.
Limitations of Milgram’s research
Ethical issues- Participants were deceived and there was psychological harm on the participants.
Study lacks mundane realism and ecological validity as the task the participants has to take was not something that people would need to do in everyday lives.
What are the three situational variables in Milgram’s later research?
Proximity- if the learner was in the same room and touching distance to the teacher or is they were in separate rooms.
Uniform- Lab coat/ normal clothes
Location- Run down office block/ Yale university