Social influence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is conformity?

A

A change in a person‘s behaviour or opinions as a result of real or imagined pressure from a person or group of people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is internalisation?

A

Internalisation is the deepest type of conformity, where we take on the majority view because we accept it as correct,leading to permanent change in behaviour even when the group is absent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is identification?

A

Identification is a moderate type of conformity where we act in the same way with the group because we value it and want to be a part of it, but we don’t necessarily agree with everything the majority believes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is compliance?

A

A superficial and temporary type of conformity where we outwardly go along with the majority view but privately disagree with it the change in our behaviour only lasts as long as the group is monitoring us

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is informational social influence (ISI)?

A

An explanation of conformity that says we agree with the opinion of the majority because we believe it is correct, we accept it because you want to be correct as well this may lead to internalisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is normative social influence (NSI)

A

An explanation of conformity that says we agree with the opinion of the majority because we want to be accepted, gain social approval and be liked, this may lead to compliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the evaluation research support for informational social influence by Lucas at al 2006

A

When students rated the mathematical ability as poor there was a greater conformity in the study of incorrect answers, when completing mathematical problems that appeared to be hard, this explains informational social influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the evaluation for individual differences in normative social influence?

A

There are individual differences in the way people respond for example McGhee and Teevan 1967 found that a high need of affiliation were more likely to conform because of a desire to be liked were others may not
because they do not have the need to be liked

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the evaluation point for informational social influence and normative social influence working together?

A

The two process approach explains NSI and ISI as being equally involved asit isn’t always possible to be sure when NSI and ISI are at work

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was Asch testing?

A

He was testing conformity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the procedure of Asch’s study?

A

The participants were asked which of the three lines matched the standard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How many participants were in Asch’s study?

A

123 male Undergraduates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

In Asch’s study what was the range of Confederates in numbers

A

6 to 8 conferedarates within a group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What were the results of Asch’s study?

A

The naive participant gave the wrong answer 36.8% of the time overall, 25% of the participants did not conform on any trials, meaning 75% conformed at least once
(Normative social influence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were the three variations of Asch’s study?

A

Group size, unanimity and task difficulty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is unanimity in Asch’s study

A

Unanimity is the extent to which all of the members agreed the Confederates selected the same comparison line and it produced at the greatest degree of conformity in the naive participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the evaluation point of Asch’s study to do with a child of its time

A

The study was repeated 30 years later finding a drop in conformity since the original study highlighting that social norms have changed a great deal since 1950s America, showing that it is not consistent across situations and across time therefore not a fundamental feature of human behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What was the evaluation point to do with artificial situation and task on Asch’s study?

A

There are demand characteristics as participants were aware of the study, You also cannot generalise the line study lab experiment to every day situations, were the consequences of conformity might be more important and interaction between groups would be more direct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What was the evaluation point to do with limited application of findings in Asch’s study

A

Only men were tested in the original study and it was conducted in the United States is an individualist culture (concerned with themselves rather than their social group) however collectivists cultures conformity rates are higher.
this can only be applied to American men because he didn’t take gender and cultural differences into account

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are the ethical issues as an evaluation point to do with Asch’s study

A

The naive participants were deceived

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What did Zimbardo and his colleagues seek to answer with the Stanford prison experiment

A

Do prison guards behave brutally because they have sadistic personalities or is it the situation that creates such behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What did Zimbardo’s procedure consist off

A

mock prison in the basement of the psychology department at Stanford university students were randomly assigned as prisoners and guards, Prisoners were arrested in their homes and blindfolded strip-searched deloused and issued a uniform and number.
Guards were given a wooden club handcuffs keys and mirror shades

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

How long did Zimbardo’s study last for

A

It lasted for six days but was supposed to be for 14

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What were the findings in Zimbardo’s study

A

The prisoners rebelled and the guards took opportunity to enforce rules and punish even with the smallest misdemeanour prisoners became depressed and anxious they were treated with brutality and 3 people in total chose to leave

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What was the conclusion of Zimbardo’s Study

A

It revealed the power of the situation to influence people’s behaviour as guards prisoners and researchers all come formed to their roles within the prison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What was the evaluation point to do with the control in Zimbardo’s study

A

There is high internal validity which is a strength of the study as they were control over variables they chose emotionally stable individuals and randomly assigned roles of guard and prisoner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What was the evaluation point to do with lack of realism in Zimbardo’s study

A

Other psychologists argue participants were merely acting rather than conforming to role based on stereotypes
However the participants stated that the situation felt real and gives it a high degree of internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What was the evaluation point To do with role of dispositional influences in Zimbardo’s study

A

The social roles in the conclusion may have been overstated. as the guards behaviour indicates they were able to exercise right and wrong choices despite the situation or pressures of conforming to a role, based on individual personalities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What was the evaluation to do with lack of research support on Zimbardo’s study

A

Replicated studies of the original showed contrasting findings as prisoners eventually took control of mock prison, because they were able to share a social identity as a cohesive group but the guards could not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What were the ethical issues in Zimbardo’s study

A

The breached ethical issues were
Protection from psychological harm
Protection from physical harm
Right to withdraw

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What is obedience

A

Obedience is a form of social influence in which an individual follows a direct order, the person issuing the order is usually a figure of authority who has the power to punish when obedient behaviour is not forthcoming

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What did Milgram’s original obedience study seek to answer

A

Why the German population had followed the orders of Hitler and slaughtered over 10 million

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

What were the three roles that were in Milgram’s study

A

The Confederate as Mr Wallace (researcher) the learner (getting fake shocks in different room) and the true participant was the teacher

34
Q

How many participants were in Milgram’s study

A

There was 40 male participants recruited through newspaper adverts and flyers (Hints at deception)

35
Q

What was the procedure of Milgram’s study

A

The teacher or the naive participant was required to give the learner an increasing severe electric shock each time the learner made a mistake on a learning task

36
Q

What were the four speech prods used to induce the teacher to carry on Given by the Confederate

A

Prod 1 “Please continue” or “please go on”
Prod 2 “ The experiment requires that you continue”
Prod 3 “ it is absolutely essential that you continue”
Prod 4 “ you have no other choice you must go on”

37
Q

What were the findings of Milgram’s study on obedience

A

No participants stopped below 300 V 12.5 participants stopped at 300 V
65% continued to the highest level of 450 V
Participants showed signs of extreme tension whilst participating in the study, and all were debriefed a total of 84% reported that they felt glad to have participated

38
Q

What was the evaluation point of Milgram’s study to do with low internal validity

A

Milgram may not have tested what he intended to test, other psychologists state there is low internal validity as participants may have guessed the true nature of the study however the repeat of the experiment shows similar findings proving that participants thought that the Shocks were genuine

39
Q

What was the valuation point of Milgram’s study to do with good external validity

A

The relationship between the authority figure and the participant accurately reflected wider authority relationships in real life and can be generalised to other situations

40
Q

What was the valuation point of Milgram study to do with supporting application

A

Replication of Milgram study is produced similar results as 80% of participants delivered and maximum shock of 160 V to an apparently unconscious man and the participants also displayed signs of anxiety as in the original study

41
Q

What was the alternative explanation to do with social identity theory in Milgram’s study

A

social identity theory is the key to obedience as it lies in the group identification, as the participants identified with the experimenter however when obedience levels fell this was due to the participants identifying less with the Scientist and more with the victim

42
Q

What were the ethical issues of Milgram’s study

A

Milgram deceived his participants

And can also be argued that there was no protection from psychological harm

43
Q

What are situational variables in Obedience

A

The factors influencing the level of obedience shown by participants there are all related to external circumstances rather than the personalities of the people involved

44
Q

What is proximity in studies

A

The physical closeness or distance of an authority figure to the person they are giving an order to

45
Q

In what way does location factor into obedience

A

The place where an order is issued the relevant factor that influences obedience is the status of prestige associated with the location

46
Q

What does uniform do in relation to obedience

A

symbolic form of authority through uniform for example the police officers and judges this indicates the rest of us who are entitled to expect our obedience

47
Q

What is suggested with proximity as a factor when being instructed by an authority figure

A

Remote instruction for example through a telephone produces a decline in obedience by 20.5% shown in the variation on Milgram’s study

48
Q

In what way does location factor in to obedience

A

Location factors into obedience as in Milgram’s study of in one variation the location was changed to a rundown building the experimenter had less authority and obedience file to 47.5% in comparison to the 65% in the original study

49
Q

How does the role of uniform affect obedience

A

For example in Milgram’s study when the role of the experimenter wore ordinary everyday clothes rather than a lab coat the obedience dropped by 20% which is the lowest of all variations

50
Q

Evaluation of Milgram’s study to do with research support

A

In a field experiment on a replication of Milgram’s study to do with uniform people were twice as likely to obey the assistant dressed as a security guard than the one dressed in a jacket and tie when ordered to pick up litter this supports Milgram’s conclusion as uniform conveys the Authority of its wearer

51
Q

What is the evaluation point to do with Milgram’s variations in the lack of internal validity

A

Milgram studies are unclear whether the results are genuinely due to the operation of obedience or if the participants saw through the deception and acted accordingly

52
Q

Milgrams variations evaluation to do with the cross cultural replications

A

This study replicated in other cultures shows findings of cross cultural research and generally support Milgram as it shows the conclusions about obedience are not limited to American males and are valid across cultures and apply to females too

53
Q

What is the agentic state

A

A mental state where we feel no personal responsibility for our behaviour because we believe ourselves to be in acting for an authority figure i.e. as their agent this frees us from the demands of our consciences and allows us to obey even a destructive authority figure

54
Q

What is the legitimacy of authority

A

And explanation for obedience they suggest that we are more likely to obey people who we perceive to have authority over us, this authority is justified/legitimate by the individuals position of power within asocial hierarchy

55
Q

What is the autonomous state

A

The autonomous state is the opposite of being in agentic state as it means to be independent or free and may behave according to our own principles and there is a feeling of responsibility for their own actions

56
Q

What is the agentic shift

A

The shift from autonomy to agency and it occurs when a person perceives someone else as a figure of authority this other person has a greater power because of their position in the social hierarchy

57
Q

What are binding factors

A

Binding factors are aspects of the situation that allow the person to ignore or minimise the damaging affect of their own behaviour – reduce the moral strain that they are feeling this shift the responsibility to the victim and denies the damage

58
Q

What is destructive authority

A

Destructive authority is when problems arise when legitimate authority becomes destructive this can be very clearly shown in Milgram study where the experimenter used to prods to order participants to behave in ways that went against their consciences

59
Q

Weaknesses of agentic state and agentic shift applied to Milgram’s study

A

This does not explain many of the research findings for example why some of the participants did not obey and at best the agentic shift can only account for some situations of obedience

60
Q

What is a strength of legitimacy of authority

A

It can help explain how obedience can lead to real life warcrimes

61
Q

What is a dispositional explanation

A

Any explanation of behaviour that highlights the importance of the individuals personality For example the disposition

62
Q

What is a authoritarian personality

A

type of personality that Adorno argued was especially susceptible to obeying people in authority. Such individuals are also thought to be submissive to close to those in higher statuses and dismissive of inferiors

63
Q

How many participants were in Adorno’s study on authoritarian personalities

A

More than 2000 middle-class white Americans

64
Q

What is used to measure a authoritarian personality in Adorno’s study

A

They used a fascism scale (F scale)

65
Q

What were the findings of the authoritarian study by Adorno

A

People with authoritarian leanings scored high on the F scale and identified with strong people they were also conscious of their own and others’ status showing excessive respect to those of a higher status.
They also have their own cognitive style, show distinctive stereotyping about other groups, and have showed a strong positive correlation between authoritarianism and prejudice

66
Q

What are the authoritarian characteristics

A

Tendency to be especially obedient to authority, extreme respect for authority and submissiveness to it, highly conventional attitudes towards sex race and gender and a very inflexible outlook and are very uncomfortable with uncertainty

67
Q

What are the origins of authoritarian personalities

A

Concluded that they are formed in childhood as a result of harsh parenting because of extremely strict discipline and expectation of absolute loyalty, impossibly high standards and severe criticism of perceived failings, it is also characterised by conditional love
*therefore the fears are displaced onto others who are perceived to be weaker

68
Q

What is the evaluation to do with authoritarian personality looking into research support

A

Through interviews of a small sample of participants it showed a correlation between the two measured variables which are a obedience and authoritarian personality however it is impossible to draw this conclusion as they are not directly linked with each other

69
Q

What is the limitation of the authoritarian personality study to do with limited explanation

A

It is hard to explain obedient behaviour in the majority of the country’s population for example in World War II it is difficult to say that all of the soldiers possessed and authoritarian personality and a much more realistic explanation would be social identity as an explanation for obedience

70
Q

And evaluation point for authoritarian personality is the political bias point which says…

A

The F scale measures the tendency towards an extreme form of right wing ideology it is politically biased as an interpretation of authoritarian personality.
It is not a comprehensive dispositional explanation across the whole political spectrum

71
Q

What is the evaluation point of authoritarian personality looking into methodological problems

A

The scale is just measuring the tendency to agree to everything through showing flawed methodology and it is possible to get a high score for an authoritarian personality through ticking the same line of boxes

72
Q

What is the evaluation point of authoritarian personality looking into correlation not causation

A

Adorno could not claim that harsh parenting style causes the development of an authoritarian personality

73
Q

What is the resistance to social influence

A

Refers to the ability of people to understand the social pressure to conform to the majority or to obey authority its ability to withstand social pressure is influenced by both situational and dispositional factors

74
Q

What is social support

A

The presence of people who resist pressures to conform or obey can help others to do the same these people act as models to show others that resistance to social influence is possible

75
Q

What is locus of control

A

Refers to the sense we each have about what directs events in our lives internals believe that they are mostly responsible for what happens to them (internal locus of control).Externals believe it is mainly a matter of luck or other outside forces (external locus of control).

76
Q

in Milgram’s study what is the effect of social support

A

Social pressure can be reduced if there I’d another person present to disobey
In one of Milgram’s variations obedience dropped from 65% to 10% when joined with a disobedient confederate.
The dissonance acts as a model for the participant to copy that frees then to act from their own conscience

77
Q

Resistance to social influence: internal locus of control traits

A
  • Self confidence
  • More achievement orientated
  • Have higher intelligence and and have less need for social approval
78
Q

Evaluation for resistance to conformity includes research support stating…

A

Research evidence supports the role of dissenting peers resisting conformity, as replicated studies found that Asch type study there was a drop in conformity with a dissenter
*showing that resistance is not just motivated by following what someone else says

79
Q

An Evaluation of resistance to obedience is that it has research support stating…

A

A strength is research evidence supporting the role of dissenting peers as a later replicated study showed higher levels of resistance than in Milgram’s , Gasmons showed 29 of 33 groups of participants 88% rebelled
*linking peer support to greater resistance

80
Q

Evaluations of locks of control is research support…

A

Holland repeated Milgrams baseline study finding that 37% with internal locus of control did not go to highest shock level whereas 23% of externals did not continue
(Internal LOC showing greater resistance to authority)
*this research support increases validity

81
Q

Evaluation of Locus off Control is that it has contradictory research…

A

Not all research supports link of LOC and resistance
Twenge et al analysed over a 40 year period data of American obedience studies that resistance to obedience is also more external than internal in referral to LOC
Challenges in linking internal LOC and increasing resistant behaviour, shows that results may be due to a changing society were many things are out of personal control

82
Q

Another evaluation of locus of control is the limited role of LOC stating…

A

Resisting social influence may be somewhat exaggerated as past experiences come in to play with behaviour as people who’ve conformed our obeyed in specific situations are likely to do so again (even with a high internal LOC