Social influence Flashcards

1
Q

What are the 3 types of conformity Kelman (1958)?

A

Compliance
Internalisation
Identification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is compliance?

A

Individuals go along with the group to gain approval or avoid disapproval.
Compliance does not change anyone’s underlying attitude, only in views and behaviours they express in public.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is internalisation?

A

Individuals may go along with the group because of an acceptance of their views. Can lead to acceptance of group’s point of view publicly and privately.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is indentification?

A

Combination of both compliance and internalisation. People accept the behaviour they are adopting as right
Does not necessarily change the views of the person’s views privately.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the longest affecting type of conformity?

A

Internalisation - change of public and private beliefs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the shortest affecting type of conformity?

A

Compliance - change of public behaviour but not private and is temporary as it stops as soon as the group pressure stops.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is normative social influence?

A

This refers to instances where someone conforms in order to fit in and gain approval / avoid disapproval from other group members.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is informational social influence?

A

Refers to instances where people conform because they are uncertain about what to do in a particular situation so look for guidance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

1 strength of informational social influence, Lucas (2006).

A

Gave students maths problems to solve - easy or difficult. Found students tended to conform to the more difficult problems. Shows we look to other people when we are unsure and assume they would know better.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

1 strength for normative social influence.

A

Adolescents exposed to the message that the majority of their peers did not smoke subsequently less likely to smoke.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

1 weakness for normative social influence.

A

People do not recognise they are being affected by others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Who is normative social influence most likely to affect?

A

Affects people who seek approval of others more than people who are less concerned with being liked.
Individuals who have a greater need for affiliation more likely to be affected by NSI.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was Asch’s studing into?

A

Study into conformity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe Asch’s study procedure.

A

`Sample : 50 male American students.

The naive participants entered the room and sat with 6 people who they thought were ppts but they were in fact confederates.
Each person in the room had to say aloud Which comparison line (A, B or C) was most like the target line ‘x’. The answer was obvious at the beginning. The real participant sat at the end of the row and gave his answer last. There were 18 trials in total and the confederates gave the wrong answer on 12 trials. Asch wanted to find out if the real ppts would conform to the majority view even when it was obviously wrong.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were the three variables affecting conformity?

A

Group size, unanimity of majority and difficulty of task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What were the results of Asch’s study.

A

Results: The ppts conformed in 32% of the trials, 75% of the Ps conformed at least once. When they were interviewed after the study, the Ps said that they know the answer was wrong but they did not want to beridiculed. Asch (1951) Standard line Comparison lines

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What percent of people were correct when tested alone?

A

98%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

A strength of Asch’s study.

A

-Empirical support - Crutchfield, he did it on a larger scale proving the concept.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Weakness of asch’s study

A
  • ‘may be a child of its time’ Cold war period, people were in a unique time of conforming.
  • Lacks ecological validity : setting unrealistic as it is in a lab.
  • Ethnocentric and androcentric. Mainly male dominant and only one ethnic group.
  • Unconvincing confederates may have affected some results
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

asch variations

A

Asch-more variations Unanimity and social Support When one Other person in the group gave a different answer from the Others, then group was not unanimous, conformity dropped.

Asch found that even the presence Of just one confederate that goes against the majority choice can reduce conformity by as much as 80%.This suggests that individuals conform because they are concerned about what other people think of them (e.g. normative influence).

Difficulty of Task When the lines (e.g. A, B, C) were made more similar in length it was harder to judge the correct answer and conformity increased. When we are uncertain, it seems we look to others for confirmation. The more difficult the task the greater the conformity (informational social influence) Answer in Private When participants were told to answer in private (so the rest of the group do not know their response)conformity decreased to 12%. This is because there is less group pressure as there is no fear Of disapproval or rejection from the group. Therefore normative social influence is less powerful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

asch evaluation

A

The Ps were men (androcentric sample) but women conform differently Larsen et al. (1979) so we cannot generalise the results to women.
Time validity-The social climate has changed and Larsen (1974) found a lower conformity rate when he replicated Asch’s study.
The Ps were American and Smith & Bond(1996) carried out a meta- analysis of replications in various cultures and found that there were variations between but also within cultures. The study took place in an artificial environment, the Ps were doing an artificial task so we cannot generalise the results to everyday situations especially as there were no consequences to the ps conforming but in real life there might be consequences. In the study, the Ps were not really part of the group as they did not know each Other, the ps might have acted differently if the group had been known to them. Sogon (1984) found that conformity was higher when the majority Of thegroup were friends Of the participants.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

1

A

1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

1

A

1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

When was Zimbardo’s study?

A

1973

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What was the aim of Zimbardo’s study?

A

If ‘ordinary’ people were placed in a stimulated prison environment and some of them were designated guards and some designated prisoners, how would they behave in their new social roles?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

1

A

1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

1

A

1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

1

A

1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

1

A

1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

When was Milgram’s study?

A

1963

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What was the aims of Milgram’s study?

A

To investigate what level of obedience would be shown when ppts were told by an authority figure to administer electric shocks to another person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

1

A

1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

1

A

1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

1

A

1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

1

A

1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

1

A

1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

What is agentic state?

A

A mental state where we feel no personal responsibility ,we believe we are acting on behalf of an authority figure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

What is the autonomous state?

A

People act according to their own values, and they take responsibility for the results of those actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Why would someone adopt an agentic state?

A

To maintain a positive self image. They are guilt-free from their perspective.

40
Q

What are binding factors?

A

These are what keep the ppt in an agentic state because they use strategies to reduce the degree of moral strain and shit it onto the authority figure.

41
Q

What did Milgram believe about legitimate authority?

A

Believed there is a shared expectation among people that many situations do ordinarily have a socially controlling figure. L.A stems not from any personal characteristics but from his or her perceived position in a social situation.

42
Q

What is legitimate authority?

A

Person who is perceived to be in a position of social control within situation.

43
Q

What is the definition of the situation about in legitimacy of authority?

A

Tendency for people to accept definitions of a situation that are provided by a legitimate authority. You allow the authority figure to define its meaning so you don’t feel as guilty.

44
Q

What is legitimate authority requiring an institution about?

A

If the authority figure’s commands are potentially harmful it must occur in an institution.

45
Q

Evaluation for the agentic state.
1 strength
2 weaknesses

A

Bass and Schmitt (2001) support the theory. When they showed a film of Milgram’s study to students then asked them who they thought was responsible for the harm done to Mr Wallace they blamed the “experimenter”. They saw the experimenter as an authority figure.

However it does not explain why 35% of the participants stopped before reaching 450 volts. This indicates that individual differences are involved.
It cannot explain why in real life on many occasions people are “zealous” and go far beyond the orders they are given e.g. the actions of Lieutenant William Calley in My Lai (Vietnam).

46
Q

Closely connected strength and weakness for legitimate authority.

A

Strength, responding to a police officer during an emergency.
Weakness, if others used to justify misconduct, you may lose moral values. May end up readily engaging in unquestioning obedience.

47
Q

What is the F scale?

A

A questionnaire measuring authority levels. ‘Facism’ scale created by Adorno et al. (1950)
Contained statements such as ‘Rules are there for people to follow, not change.’ Agreeing with this indicates authoritarian personality.

48
Q

Adorna also found people who scored highly on the F scale had been raised how?
If you have an Authoritarian personality…

A

By parents who used an authoritarian parenting style (physical punishment)
You are rigid thinkers who obey authority.

49
Q

Who defined right-wing authoritarianism?

A

Robert Altemeyer (1981)

50
Q

What are the three important personality characteristics in RWA?

A

Conventionalism - obeying standard norms and values.
Authoritarian aggression - aggressive feelings to those who violate these norms.
Authoritarian submission - Submission to legit authorities.

51
Q

What did Altemeyer find about RWA and obedience in Milgram’s study?

A

Significant correlation between RWA scores and the levels of shock ppts were willing to give themselves.

52
Q

What was the Elms and Milgram (1966) study about?

A

Follow up study which selected the 20 obedient ppts (final shock level administered) and 20 defiant ppts (refused shock) and they were given the f scale.

53
Q

What was Milgram’s overall reason for doing his research?

A

He was interested in why so many Nazis killed so many innocent people.

54
Q

What did Elms and Milgram find?

A

The ppts that scored highest on the f scale were most likely to have administered the full shock so had a RWA personality. Tf Adorno’s research supports the research of Milgram.

55
Q

A strength of Authoritarianism personality.

A

Altemeyer refined Adorno’s concept of authoritarian personality and his research supported Adorno’s due to a stronger questionnaire design so it is makes this concept more valid.

56
Q

2 weakness of authoritarianism personality

A

Response bias in the f scale questionnaire - all the questions were labelled in one direction so if you put agree to all of them you would come out as very authoritarian.
It can be seen as a left wing theory as it identifies individuals with a conservative political viewpoint as having a disorder.

57
Q

Who showed social support helped people resist conformity.

A

Asch (1956)

58
Q

How did Asch show social support helped resist conformity? And results?

A

He did this by showing when 1 person breaks away. Tf conformity decreased from 33% to 6%. A dissenter within the group makes others in the group more confident to resist.

59
Q

Who showed social support helped resist obedience?

A

Milgram

60
Q

How did Milgram come up with social support helping to resist obedience? What were his results?

A

Disobedient confederates enables obedience to decrease from 65% to 10%. As a result we become more confident in refusing to obey. An outlier, someone who does not conform to the norm would make other more confident.

61
Q

What is the locus of control?

A

Confidence in resisting social influence. Individual’s conception of their personal control

62
Q

What is a high internal locus of control?

A

Rely less on others for opinions and they can resist social influence. Appreciating their own qualities, valuing themselves and decision. MORE SELF-CONFIDENCE.

63
Q

What is a high external locus of control?

A

More reliant on others. Likely to be more passive and you accept the influence of others more easily. Gang membership - people would conform to external locus of control.

64
Q

Who is more likely to become a leader of a group?

A

Internals because they are more achievement-orientated, self-confident and search for themselves rather than waiting to be led by others.

65
Q

A strength of resisting social influence (social support and locus of control).

A

-Oliner + Oliner (1988) interviewed groups of non-Jewish people who had lived through the holocaust. 300 of them took in Jews and in the LOC test they scored high internalisation which supports this concept.

66
Q

2 weaknesses of resisting social influence (social support and locus of control).

A
  • Not so much a complete weakness but Rotter (1982) says on the LOC that you cannot be totally external or internal as it depends on the situation. eg: if you were trialing for a new football team you would use internal as it is your own self confidence. But if you were going back to an old team = external
  • Anomaly - obedience has increased over time but so has externality, Tf challenging link between LOC and resisting social influence.
67
Q

Three components to gaining minority influence.

A

Consistency
Commitment
Flexibility

68
Q

What is consistency in minority influence?

A

Keeping the same beliefs and opinions between member of the minority influence over time.

69
Q

What is commitment in minority influence?

A

Dedication to the cause and not acting out of self interest.

70
Q

What is flexibility in minority influence?

A

Not being rigid or dogmatic, having to adapt their arguments to new situations.

71
Q

Example of consistency in minority influence.

A

Martin Luther King claimed all men were born equal. Whatever of the colour of the skin or their race they should be treated as equal.

72
Q

Example of commitment in minority influence.

A

The ‘extinction rebellions’ are being abused for their aims but they have mass support and are sticking to their aim.

73
Q

Example of flexibility in minority influence.

A

Suffragettes compromising by starting off with wanting over 25s women to have the vote. When their overall aim was for all women to have the vote.

74
Q

Who did a key study into minority influence?

A

Moscovici (1969)

75
Q

What was Moscivi’s procedure?

A

4 naive ppts. 2 minority confederates. Shown series of blue slides varying in intensity. 2 confederates said green for the consistent experiment. The 2 confederates said green for 2/3 of trial and blue for 1/3.
In control condition, 6 naive ppts, no confederates ppts called slides ‘blue throughout’.

76
Q

What did Moscovici find?

A

8% of ppts agreed with minority to say green.

inconsistent experiment only 1.25% agreed slides were green.

77
Q

Moscivi’s aim?

A

To investigate the affect of a minority on a majority

78
Q

What is conclusion of Moscovici’s experiement?

A

The minority can change the opinion of the majoirty if the ppts are consistent.

79
Q

2 strengths of minority influence.

A
  • Research support for flexibility.

- Moscovici is due to conversion as people have to think more deeply about the minority views who challenge them.

80
Q

2 weaknesses of minority influence.

A
  • Mackie (1987) believes more processing of this idea is needed, as we believe everyone thinks like we do, so we will always questions ourselves.
  • Minority influence is only a name
81
Q

What is the order of social change through minority influence?

A
  • Drawing attention to an issue.
  • Cognitive conflict
  • Consistency of position
  • The augmentation principle
  • The snowball effect.
82
Q

What is drawing attention to an issue in social change through minority influence?

A

Getting people to consider an issue can bring about social change.

83
Q

What is cognitive conflict in social change through minority influence?

A

The minority creates a conflict between majority group members and there current belief and advocated position by minority.

84
Q

What is consistency of position in social change through minority influence?

A

Minorities tend to be more successful when they have a consistent argument to everyone.

85
Q

What is the augmentation principle in social change through minority influence?

A

If a group are willing to suffer for their views they are taken more seriously.

86
Q

What is the snowball effect in social change through minority influence?

A

Small influence initially but rolls and becomes bigger as it gains support and spreads more widely.

87
Q

What is an EXAMPLE of drawing attention to an issue in social change through minority influence?

A

Suffragettes, used educational, political and militant tactics to draw attention to women being denied the voting right.

88
Q

What is an EXAMPLE of cognitive conflict in social change through minority influence?

A

Suffragettes created a conflict for majority group members between existing status quo (men’s vote) and the position of the suffragettes (women’s vote). People began to think more deeply.

89
Q

What is an EXAMPLE of consistency of position in social change through minority influence?

A

Suffragettes tended to be consistent in their views regardless of people around them. Fact women played an influential role in WW1 eventually convinced society women were ready for the vote.

90
Q

What is an EXAMPLE of the augmentation principle in social change through minority influence?

A

Suffragettes willing to risk imprisonment, even death from hunger strike. Their influence became more (augmented) powerful.

91
Q

What is an EXAMPLE of the snowball effect in social change through minority influence?

A

Suffragettes creating a universal changes as their ideology spread world wide.

92
Q

What does research repeatedly suggest about behavioural choices and group norms?

A

Behavioural choices are often related to group norms (normative influence).

93
Q

Who came up with the social norms approach?

A

Perkins and Berkowitz (1986)

94
Q

Give an example of a social norm approach.

A

At university if heavy drinking is the norm, they will drink more.

95
Q

What are social norms interventions?

A

Identifying a widespread misperception (gap between perceived norm and actual norm) relating to a specified risky behaviour within a target pop and there is an attempt to change this.

96
Q

2 Weaknesses of social change.

A
  • Social change is GRADUAL. As there is a strong tendency for human beings to conform with majority, people do not engage much in social change so the influence the minority has is frequently more latent than direct (increases the potential for change).
  • Being perceived as deviant by the majority. Minorities face the double challenge of avoiding being portrayed as deviant but also making people directly embrace their position.
97
Q

2 strengths of social change.

A
  • Attitudes about differences will become more durable. Suffragettes were able to become widely accepted and change the attitude of the majority which had been forever.
  • Improvement in medicine and associated cures, remedies, solutions.