Social Influence Flashcards
Explain Locus of Control and evaluate it
Internal - things that happen to them are controlled by themselves and their own actions
External -things happen out of their control
+ research support
> Holland = repeated milgrams study and found 37% of internals and only 23% of externals did not continue to the highest shock level
Evaluation of Zimbardos experiment
+ control
> over extraneous variables - choice of participants were emotionally stable showing the change was due to situation
- lack of realism
> argued ppts were just ‘play acting’ and based performances off stereotypes
> BUT Zimbardo found 90% of prison conversation was about prison life
Who conducted research into obedience
Milgram mostly, lil bit of Adorno
What were Milgrams situational variables and results of these
Proximity
- put teacher and learner in same room and obedience dropped to 40%
- experimenter gave orders over the phone and obedience dropped to 20.5%
Location
- conducted it in a run down building and obedience changed to 47.5%
Uniform
- the experimenter was played by an ‘ordinary member of the public’ and obedience dropped to 20%
What are the three types of conformity
Internalisation
- when a person genuinely accepts the group norm as their own
- it is a public and private change
- the change is permanent so even when the group is absent
Identification
- when a person values something about the group
- it is a mostly public change
Compliance
- when a person ‘goes along with the majority’
- it is a public but not private change
- it is only temporary
What is a barrier to social change
The minorities have a bad stereotype that people don’t want to be associated with so social change doesn’t occur.
For example, feminists can be seen as ‘man haters’
What are the two explanations of conformity
Informational social influence
- people follow the majority because they believe they are more right and they want to be right as well
- often occurs in new situations where you don’t know what is right/wrong
Normative social influence
- we agree with the majority because we want to be accepted and gain social approval
- often occurs when someone is concerned about rejection from a group
What were Asch’s variations
- Group Size
- with 3 confederate the conformity rose to 32% but any more made no difference - Unanimity
- introduced a non-conforming confederate and conformity rate dropped - Task difficulty
- made the line judging harder and found conformity increased (ISI)
Evaluation of Milgrams study
- demand characteristics
> ppts may have not believed the setup and guessed it wasn’t real electric shocks
> BUT, King - 100% women, 54% men delivered a fatal shock to a dog
+ external validity
> the lab environment accurately represented wider authority relationships
> Hofling = 21 our out of 22 nurses delivered unjustified demands of doctors
How does Locus of Control help resistance to social influence
- those who have an internal locus of control are more likely to be able to resist pressure to conform as they base their decisions on their own beliefs so can resist pressure from others
- people with internal LOC tend to be more self confident and have less need for social approval
What is the authoritarian personality
One that Adorno argued was especially susceptible to obeying people in authority and dismissive of those inferior to them
Evaluation of Asch’s research
- outdated
> Perrin + Spencer = repeated his study in 1980 and found only one ppt who conformed out of 396 - artificial task
> demand characteristics
> not something that has to be done in everyday life - not representative
> only white American men tested
> collectivist culture may have been different - cannot generalise
Describe Moscovicis study into minority influence
- ppts had to identify blue coloured slides that varied in shades and say if they were green or blue
- 2 our of the 6 people were confederates
- in one version the confederates consistently gave the same wrong answer = 8.4% agreement
- in another versions the confederates were inconsistent and agreement dropped to 1.2%
Describe the aspects to minority influence
Consistency
- keep the same beliefs over time and between the individuals to draw attention to the view
Commitment
- demonstrating dedication to their position by making sacrifices and doing extreme things to draw attention again
Flexibility
- accepting the possibility of a compromise
Evaluation for minority influence
\+ research support > Moscovici - artificial tasks - real-life application > much more complex in real life