Social Influence Flashcards
What is conformity?
A change in a person’s behaviour or opinions as a result of real or imagined pressure from a person or group of people.
What is internalisation?
- A deep type of conformity where we take on the majority view because we accept that it is correct.
- It occurs when a person accepts the group’s norm.
- It leads to a far-reaching and permanent change in behaviour, even when the group is not present.
What is identification?
- A moderate conformity where we act in the same way in the group because we value it and want to be part of it, but do not necessarily agree with everything the majority agrees.
- We publicly change our opinion or behaviour to fit in but do not privately agree with everything.
- With a group of people that you know.
What is compliance?
- A superficial and temporary type of conformity where we outwardly go along with the majority view but privately disagree with it.
- The change in our behaviour only lasts as long as the group is monitoring us.
- With a group of people you don’t know.
What is Informational Social Influence?
- An explanation of conformity that says we agree with the opinion of the majority because we believe it is correct.
- We accept it because we want to be correct as well
- This may lead to internalisation.
What is Normative Social Influence?
- An explanation of conformity that says that we agree with the opinion of the majority because we want to be accepted, gain social approval or be liked.
- This may lead to compliance.
What is a laboratory experiment?
- Highly controlled
- Not necessarily in a lab
- Researcher controls all aspects such as the place, time and which participants take part
What are the strengths of a laboratory experiment?
- Easier to replicate and standardise
- Easier to identify the cause and effect
What are the limitations of a laboratory experiment?
Lacks internal validity because the participants may display demand characteristics as they know they are being tested
What is a natural experiment?
- Natural environment of the participants
- Researcher has no control of what happens in the environment
What are the strengths of a natural experiment?
Participants will give a more honest response increasing the internal validity
What are the limitations of a natural experiments?
- It is difficult to identify the cause and effect
- The researcher has no control of the variables so it would be difficult for the experiment to be replicated
What is a field experiment?
- Occurs in the natural environment of the participants
- The researcher will still attempt to control what happens in the environment
What is a confederate?
A participant who is in on the experiment
What is a participant?
Taking part in the experiment and knows what they are testing
What is a naive participant?
A participant who is taking part but who is unaware of the real experiment
What is a dissenter?
This person acts as a supporter to the naive participant
- Is in on the experiment
What were the aims of Asch’s research?
To investigate the extent to which social pressure from a majority group could affect a person to conform.
What was the procedure of Asch’s research?
- Laboratory experiment
- 6 to 8 members sat in a row on a table and were asked to match a line to another line of the same length, saying it out loud
- 123 American Undergraduates were tested
What were the findings of Asch’s research?
- Naive participants gave the wrong answer 36.8% of the time
- 25% of participants didn’t conform at all
- In a control group with no pressure to conform, less than 1% of participants conformed
In Asch’s research, how did group size affect conformity?
- With 3 confederates conformity rose to 36.8%, but the addition of more confederates made little difference to conformity rates.
- This suggests that a small majority is not sufficient for influence however there is no need for more than 3.
In Asch’s research, how did unanimity affect conformity?
The presence of a dissenting confederate meant that conformity was reduced by a quarter from the level it was when the majority was unanimous.
- The presence of a dissenter enabled the naive participant to behave more independently.
- This suggests that the influence of the majority depends to some extent on the unanimity of the group.
In Asch’s research, how did task difficulty affect conformity?
- Increasing task difficulty increases conformity rates because people begin to believe other people are correct due to looking at them for guidance.
- This suggests that informational social influence plays a greater role in conformity
What was the aim of Zimbardo’s research?
To investigate conformity to social roles
What were the procedures of Zimbardo’s research?
- Observational experiment
- Mock prison in a basement
- 24 American male student volunteers (paid $15 a day to take part)
- Participants randomly assigned roles either guard or prisoner
- 16 rules the guards enforced on prisoners
- Guards worked shifts of 3 at a time
- Prisoners had numbers not names
- Social roles of guards and prisoners were strictly divided
What were the findings of Zimbardo’s research?
- After a slow start to stimulation, the guards took up their roles with enthusiasm
- Guards became a threat to the psychological and physical health of the prisoners
- Experiment stopped after 6 days instead of 14
- After 2 days the prisoners rebelled
- Frequent head counts, press ups
- One prisoner was released on day 1 after showing signs of psychological disturbance
- 2 more released on day 4
- The guards identified more with their roles and became more aggressive, some appeared to enjoy their power
- Putting the prisoners in ‘the hole’
What conclusions can be drawn from Zimbardo’s research?
- Both guards and prisoners conformed to their social roles
- Highlights how people conform to social roles and how the role that is taken on can overcome judgement and cause a change in behaviour
What is a social role?
- The parts people play as members of various social groups.
- These are accompanied by the expectations we and others have of what is appropriate for each role
What was the aim of Milgram’s research?
- Milgram wanted to understand why the German public had followed the orders of Hitler
- Simply, why do people obey figures of authority
What type of experiment was Milgram’s research?
- Observational
- Laboratory
What 4 prods were used in Milgram’s research?
- Prod 1= ‘Please continue’ or ‘Please go on’
- Prod 2= ‘The experiment requires you to continue’
- Prod 3= ‘It is absolutely essential that you continue’
- Prod 4= ‘You have no other choice, you must go on’
What were the procedures of Milgram’s research?
- There was a rigged draw for their role as learner or teacher
- A confederate was always the learner whilst the true participant was the teacher
- The experimenter was also a confederate, played by an actor dressed in a lab coat
- Participants were told they could leave the study at any time
- The learner was strapped in a chair in another room and wired with electrodes
- The teacher was required to give the learner an increasingly severe shock every time the learner made a mistake on a task
- Before the experiment the shock was demonstrated on the teacher before the experiment took place so they understood the pain. It was only a small shock but the teacher thought that it was of a higher voltage
- When the learner got to 300 volts he pounded his head on the wall and gave no response to the next question, this is the same when 315 volts were admitted
In Milgram’s research, how were recruits selected and how many were there?
- Recruited 40 male participants through newspaper adverts and flyers
- The ad said it was a study about memory
- Participants were age 20-50 and ranged in occupation from unskilled to professional
- Offered $4.50 to take part
What were the findings of Milgram’s research?
- No participant stopped below 300 volts
- 12.5% of participant stopped at 300 volts
- 65% of participants continued to the highest voltage of 450 volts
- Qualitative data was also collected, such as observations that the participants showed signs of extreme tension such as sweat, stutter, 3 even had full-blown seizures
- 84% felt glad to have participated
What is a strength of Milgram’s research?
- There is a high level of realism
- This increases the external validity because the results can be generalised.
What is a criticism of Milgram’s research?
- The participants displayed demand characteristics
- In 2013 Gina Perry analysed the tapes of the experiment and confirmed that the participants raised their doubts about the shocks
- This reduces the internal validity of the experiment