Social Influence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

3 different types of conformity?

A

1) . Compliance = ‘going along with others’.
2) . Internalisation = accepting group values.
3) . Identification = desire groups values so conform.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

2 types of conformity?

A

1) . NSI = desire for approval.

2) . ISI = accept groups information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Evaluations of ISI and NSI?

A

ISI =

1) . Research support =
- Lucas (maths questions getting harder).
2) . Individual differences =
- Asch (less conformity in students).

NSI =

1) . Research support =
- Asch (writing answers down ).
2) . Individual differences =
- McGhee and Teevan (nAffiliators).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Asch’s procedures?

A
  • Confederate gave the wrong answer for judging a line.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Asch’s findings?

A
  • 36.8% = conformity.
  • 75% = conformed at least once.
  • 25% = never conformed.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Asch’s variations?

A

1) . Group size = peaked at 3.
2) . Dissenter = reduced conformity.
3) . Task difficulty = increased conformity (ISI).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Asch’s evaluations?

A

1) . Child of its time =
- Perrin and Spencer –> less conformity.
2) . Artificial situation + task =
- trivial task –> demand characteristics.
3) . Limited application of findings =
- only on American men.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Zimbardo’s procedures?

A
  • Students randomly assigned prisoner or guard in mock prison.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Zimbardo’s findings?

A
  • Guards became brutal.

- Prisoners became withdrawn and depressed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Zimbardo’s conclusions?

A

Participants conformed to their social roles.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Zimbardo’s evaluations?

A

1) . Control =
- random assigned –> increased internal validity.
2) . Lack of realism =
- Banuazizi and Movahedi –> play acting.
3) . Dispositional influences =
- Fromm –> 1/3 guards…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Milgram’s procedures?

A
  • P. (teacher) gave fake electric shock to confederate (learner).
  • Received instructions from ‘experimenter’.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Milgram’s findings?

A
  • 100% = went past 300v.

- 65% = went to 450v.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Milgram’s evaluations?

A

1) . Low internal validity =
- Orne and Holland –> guessed shocks were fake.
2) . Good external validity =
- Hofling –> applied to hospital.
3) . Ethical issues =
- deceived his participants.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Milgram’s situational variables?

A

1). Proximity =

  • touch –> 30% obedience.
  • P. could hear learner = 40%.

2) . Location =
- run-down office = 47.5%.
3) . Uniform =
- member of public = 20%.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Milgram’s situational variables evaluations?

A

1) . Research support =
- Bickman –> coin for meter.
2) . Lacks internal validity =
- Orne and Holland –> extra manipulation.
3) . Cross-culture replications =
- Miranda –> in Spanish students (90%).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

2 social-psychological factors of obedience?

A

1) . Agentic state =
- acting as an agent.
2) . Legitimacy of authority =
- created by hierarchical nature of society.

18
Q

Autonomous state? Agentic shift?

A

1) . Autonomous state =
- free to act according to conscience.
2) . Agentic shift =
- switching from autonomy to agentic state.

19
Q

Destructive authority?

A

Problems arise of legitimate authority figures.

  • e.g. Hitler.
20
Q

What is the dispositional explanation of obedience.

A

Authoritarian personality.

21
Q

Adorno’s procedures?

A

F-scale = study attitudes towards fascism.

22
Q

Adorno’s findings?

A

People with authoritarian personality =

  • strong on F-scale.
  • fixed cognitive style.
23
Q

Authoritarian personality characteristics?

A

Extreme respect for authority and obedience to it.

24
Q

Where does the authoritarian personality come from?

A

Harsh parenting =

  • creates hostility that can’t be expressed against parents so is displaced.
25
Q

Dispositional explanations’ evaluations?

A

1) . Research support =
- Elms –> Milgram’s P. had authoritarian personality.
2) . Limited explanation =
- can’t explain majority behaviour (Nazis).
3) . Political bias =
- F-scale –> extreme right wing, ignores left wing authoritarianism.

26
Q

2 ways people resist social influence?

A

1) . Social support.

2) . Locus of control (LOC).

27
Q

How does social support help resist conformity?

A

Reduced by the presence of dissenters in the group.

28
Q

How does social support help resist obedience?

A

Reduced in presence of disobedient peer who acts as a model to follow.

29
Q

Evaluation of social support as a means of resisting conformity?

A

1) . Research support =

- Allen and Levine –> dissenter decreased conformity in Asch-type study.

30
Q

Evaluation of social support as a means of resisting obedience?

A

1) . Research support =

- Gamson –> dissenter decreased obedience in Milgram-type study.

31
Q

2 types of LOC?

A

1) . Internal =
- control what happens to them.
2) . External =
- can’t control what happens to them.

32
Q

Which type of LOC are more likely to resist social influence?

A

High internal LOC =

  • base decisions on own beliefs.
33
Q

Evaluations of LOC?

A

1) . Research support =
- internals –> less likely to go to 450v in Milgram replica.
2) . Contradictory evidence =
- Twenge –> people have become more external and more disobedient.

34
Q

What is minority influence?

A

Small group influence the majorities beliefs.

35
Q

What type of conformity does minority influence lead to?

A

Internalisation.

36
Q

What are the 4 factors for minority influence?

A

1) . Consistency =
- same beliefs over time and place.
2) . Commitment =
- augmentation principle –> personal sacrifice.
3) . Flexibility =
- more convincing if they accept counter-argument.
4) . Process of change (snowball effect) =
- minority view gathers momentum over time.

37
Q

Minority influence evaluation?

A

1) . Research support (consistency) =
- Moscovici –> blue/green sliders.
2) . Research support (depth of thought) =
- Martin –> minority views have longer effect as they are deeply processed.
3) . Artificial tasks =
- trivial –> not reflective.

38
Q

Role of minority influence?

A

Powerful force for innovation and social change.

  • e.g. civil rights movement in USA.
39
Q

Lessons from conformity research on social change?

A

NSI = social change by drawing attention to what the majority is doing.

40
Q

Lessons from obedience research on social change?

A
  • Disobedient role models.

- Gradual commitment = lead to change.

41
Q

Evaluation of social influence and social change?

A

1) . Research support =
- Nolan –> NSI led to reducing energy consumption.
2) . Only indirectly effective =
- Nemeth –> indirect and appear later (smoking).
3) . Role of deeper processing =
- majority views create deeper thinking, not minorities.