Social Influence Flashcards

1
Q

3 different types of conformity?

A

1) . Compliance = ‘going along with others’.
2) . Internalisation = accepting group values.
3) . Identification = desire groups values so conform.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

2 types of conformity?

A

1) . NSI = desire for approval.

2) . ISI = accept groups information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Evaluations of ISI and NSI?

A

ISI =

1) . Research support =
- Lucas (maths questions getting harder).
2) . Individual differences =
- Asch (less conformity in students).

NSI =

1) . Research support =
- Asch (writing answers down ).
2) . Individual differences =
- McGhee and Teevan (nAffiliators).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Asch’s procedures?

A
  • Confederate gave the wrong answer for judging a line.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Asch’s findings?

A
  • 36.8% = conformity.
  • 75% = conformed at least once.
  • 25% = never conformed.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Asch’s variations?

A

1) . Group size = peaked at 3.
2) . Dissenter = reduced conformity.
3) . Task difficulty = increased conformity (ISI).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Asch’s evaluations?

A

1) . Child of its time =
- Perrin and Spencer –> less conformity.
2) . Artificial situation + task =
- trivial task –> demand characteristics.
3) . Limited application of findings =
- only on American men.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Zimbardo’s procedures?

A
  • Students randomly assigned prisoner or guard in mock prison.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Zimbardo’s findings?

A
  • Guards became brutal.

- Prisoners became withdrawn and depressed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Zimbardo’s conclusions?

A

Participants conformed to their social roles.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Zimbardo’s evaluations?

A

1) . Control =
- random assigned –> increased internal validity.
2) . Lack of realism =
- Banuazizi and Movahedi –> play acting.
3) . Dispositional influences =
- Fromm –> 1/3 guards…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Milgram’s procedures?

A
  • P. (teacher) gave fake electric shock to confederate (learner).
  • Received instructions from ‘experimenter’.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Milgram’s findings?

A
  • 100% = went past 300v.

- 65% = went to 450v.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Milgram’s evaluations?

A

1) . Low internal validity =
- Orne and Holland –> guessed shocks were fake.
2) . Good external validity =
- Hofling –> applied to hospital.
3) . Ethical issues =
- deceived his participants.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Milgram’s situational variables?

A

1). Proximity =

  • touch –> 30% obedience.
  • P. could hear learner = 40%.

2) . Location =
- run-down office = 47.5%.
3) . Uniform =
- member of public = 20%.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Milgram’s situational variables evaluations?

A

1) . Research support =
- Bickman –> coin for meter.
2) . Lacks internal validity =
- Orne and Holland –> extra manipulation.
3) . Cross-culture replications =
- Miranda –> in Spanish students (90%).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

2 social-psychological factors of obedience?

A

1) . Agentic state =
- acting as an agent.
2) . Legitimacy of authority =
- created by hierarchical nature of society.

18
Q

Autonomous state? Agentic shift?

A

1) . Autonomous state =
- free to act according to conscience.
2) . Agentic shift =
- switching from autonomy to agentic state.

19
Q

Destructive authority?

A

Problems arise of legitimate authority figures.

  • e.g. Hitler.
20
Q

What is the dispositional explanation of obedience.

A

Authoritarian personality.

21
Q

Adorno’s procedures?

A

F-scale = study attitudes towards fascism.

22
Q

Adorno’s findings?

A

People with authoritarian personality =

  • strong on F-scale.
  • fixed cognitive style.
23
Q

Authoritarian personality characteristics?

A

Extreme respect for authority and obedience to it.

24
Q

Where does the authoritarian personality come from?

A

Harsh parenting =

  • creates hostility that can’t be expressed against parents so is displaced.
25
Dispositional explanations' evaluations?
1) . Research support = - Elms --> Milgram's P. had authoritarian personality. 2) . Limited explanation = - can't explain majority behaviour (Nazis). 3) . Political bias = - F-scale --> extreme right wing, ignores left wing authoritarianism.
26
2 ways people resist social influence?
1) . Social support. | 2) . Locus of control (LOC).
27
How does social support help resist conformity?
Reduced by the presence of dissenters in the group.
28
How does social support help resist obedience?
Reduced in presence of disobedient peer who acts as a model to follow.
29
Evaluation of social support as a means of resisting conformity?
1) . Research support = | - Allen and Levine --> dissenter decreased conformity in Asch-type study.
30
Evaluation of social support as a means of resisting obedience?
1) . Research support = | - Gamson --> dissenter decreased obedience in Milgram-type study.
31
2 types of LOC?
1) . Internal = - control what happens to them. 2) . External = - can't control what happens to them.
32
Which type of LOC are more likely to resist social influence?
High internal LOC = - base decisions on own beliefs.
33
Evaluations of LOC?
1) . Research support = - internals --> less likely to go to 450v in Milgram replica. 2) . Contradictory evidence = - Twenge --> people have become more external and more disobedient.
34
What is minority influence?
Small group influence the majorities beliefs.
35
What type of conformity does minority influence lead to?
Internalisation.
36
What are the 4 factors for minority influence?
1) . Consistency = - same beliefs over time and place. 2) . Commitment = - augmentation principle --> personal sacrifice. 3) . Flexibility = - more convincing if they accept counter-argument. 4) . Process of change (snowball effect) = - minority view gathers momentum over time.
37
Minority influence evaluation?
1) . Research support (consistency) = - Moscovici --> blue/green sliders. 2) . Research support (depth of thought) = - Martin --> minority views have longer effect as they are deeply processed. 3) . Artificial tasks = - trivial --> not reflective.
38
Role of minority influence?
Powerful force for innovation and social change. - e.g. civil rights movement in USA.
39
Lessons from conformity research on social change?
NSI = social change by drawing attention to what the majority is doing.
40
Lessons from obedience research on social change?
- Disobedient role models. | - Gradual commitment = lead to change.
41
Evaluation of social influence and social change?
1) . Research support = - Nolan --> NSI led to reducing energy consumption. 2) . Only indirectly effective = - Nemeth --> indirect and appear later (smoking). 3) . Role of deeper processing = - majority views create deeper thinking, not minorities.