Social Influence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define agentic state

A

When a person sees themselves as an agent for carrying out the wishes of another person (typically a legitimate authority figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define legitimate authority

A

A person who is perceived to be in a position of social control within a situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What theory by Milgram explains obedience?

A

Agency Theory 1973

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe Agency theory 1973

A
  • Agentic shift brings people into an agentic state from an autonomous state
  • In this agent state they place responsibility of actions onto those giving the orders
  • Self image plays role in agentic state
  • Binding factors plays a role
  • Ppts would continue when experimenter took responsibility
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How does self image play a role in agentic state?

A
  • People adopt an agentic state in order to maintain a positive self image
  • Ppt may evaluate the consequences of actions on self image in autonomous state
  • In agentic state ppt doesn’t need to evaluate image against actions as action is no longer their responsibility and so isn’t seen to reflect on their self image
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What binding factors may have kept Milgrams ppts in an agentic state?

A
  • Reluctance to disrupt the experiment; ppts have already been paid so may feel obliged to continue
  • Pressure of surroundings; experiment took place at a prestigious university, making experimenter seem like legitimate authority
  • Insistence of authority figure; told they had to continue
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Evaluate agency theory

A
  • Lots of experimental evidence to support theory; Milgrams ppts claimed they wouldn’t have gone so far but we’re just following orders
  • Agency theory doesn’t explain why some people are more likely to resist and exhibit independent behaviour - doesn’t account for individual differences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe Milgram 1963

A
  • Lab experiment to test factors affecting obedience
  • 40 ppts
  • Took place at Yale
  • Ppts told it was an experiment into how punishment effected learning
  • Ppts responded to newspaper adverts
  • 2 confederates
  • Received payments for attending, didn’t depend on proceeding with experiment
  • Every wrong answer got an electric shock, starting at 15 volts and increasing to 450 volts
  • Learner made noises of pain at 300 volts
  • Teacher gave prods to continue if ppt tried to stop
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What debriefing did Milgram 1963 use?

A
  • Questionnaires
  • Interviews
  • Being reunited with learner
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the results of Milgram 1963

A
  • 65% of ppts administered shock of 450 volts

- All went to 300 volts with only 12.5% stopping there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Before the experiment what did psychiatrists, college students and colleagues predict?

A

That few would go beyond 150 volts and only 1 in 1000 would go to full 450 volts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What situational factors did Milgram identify in affecting obedience?

A
  • Presence of allies
  • Proximity to victim
  • Proximity to authority
  • Location of experiment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Milgram found out what about the presence of allies affecting obedience?

A

When there were 3 teachers (1 ppt and 2 confederates) the real ppt was less likely to obey if the other 2 refuse to obey, allies can Mel it easier to resist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Milgram found out what about the impact of proximity to the learner?

A
  • Obedience dropped to 40% when teacher was in the same room as the learner
  • Obedience dropped to 30% when teacher had to out learners hand on the shock plate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Milgram found out what about the impact of proximity to authority on obedience?

A

When authority figure gave prompts over the phone obedience dropped to 23%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did Milgram find out about the impact of location on obedience?

A

When ppt were told experiment was being run by a private company and moved to a set of rundown offices in a nearby town, obedience dropped slightly to 48% - association with prestigious institution removed so obedience dropped

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Evaluation points of Milgram 1963

A
  • Ethical issues
  • Lack of internal validity due to possibility that ppts didn’t really believe that they were inflicting real shocks
  • Lacks ecological validity -external validity
  • Underestimated individual differences
  • Has temporal validity
18
Q

What are the ethical issues associated with Milgram 1963?

A
  • Ppts deceived by not being told true aim
  • This means they couldn’t give informed consent
  • Despite Milgram claiming that he’d given them the right to withdraw, the prompts to continue made this difficult
  • Weren’t protected from harm as many showed stress during experiment
  • However they were extensively debreifed and 84% said they were happy they took part
19
Q

Which psychologists suggest Milgram lacked ecological validity?

A
  • Orne and Holland 1968

- Perry (2012)

20
Q

Orne and Holland 1968

A
  • Claimed ppts learn to distrust experiment is as they know the true purpose of the experiment may be disguised
  • Experimenter remained cool despite cries of pain, leading ppts to suppose that learner was not in any real pain
21
Q

Perry 2012

A
  • Discovered many of Milgrams ppts had been sceptical of authenticity of electric shocks at time
  • Found that people who believed shocks were real were more likely to stop earlier
  • If didn’t believe it was real, ppt may just go along with experimenter expectations, creating demand characteristics
22
Q

Blass 1999

A

Studied 9 replications of Milgram and found that, in accordance with Milgrams results, 8 of 9 showed little difference in levels of obedience between males and females

23
Q

How does Milgram 1963 lack ecological validity?

A
  • Task was unlikely to be encountered in real life
  • Mandel 1998 claims that situational determinants of obedience are not borne out by real life
  • Reserve Police Battalion 101 received orders to kill out mass killing of Jews, commander said those who weren’t up to it could be assigned other tasks, despite presence of factors that Milgram claims to increase defiance (proximity to victim and presence of allies) many still carried out orders
24
Q

How does Milgram 1963 have temporal validity?

A
  • Burger 2009 found levels of obedience similar to that if Milgram
  • Finding in the 60s still appear to be applicable today
25
Q

What does legitimate authority come from having?

A

-A defined social role which people respect - usually because it implies knowledge or come with legal power

26
Q

Evaluate the agentic state

A
  • Agentic shift proposes a rapid shift in states, however this fails to explain the findings of Lifton 1986 and work with Aushwitz doctors that showed a gradual and irreversible shift
  • Staub 1989 proposed that it’s the act of carrying out evil acts over a long period of time that changes behaviour, not Agentic shift
  • People may use situation to express cruel impulses
27
Q

Research support for legitimate authority

A
  • Tarnow (2000)
  • Study of aviation incidents
  • Found excessive dependence on the captains authority and expertise
  • Report found lack of monitoring errors in 19 of 37 accidents investigated
28
Q

What is the authoritarian personality?

A

A distinct personality pattern characterised by strict adherence to conventional values and a belief in absolute obedience and submission to authority

29
Q

Define the F scale

A

A scale developed in California 1947 as a measure of authoritarian traits or tendencies

30
Q

Define right-wing authoritarianism

A

-A cluster of personality variables (conventionalism, authority submission, authoritarian aggression) that are associated with a right-wing attitude to life

31
Q

Who initially used the F scary and for what purpose?

A
  • Adorno et al

- To measure components that make up an authoritarian personality

32
Q

What is the typical way of thinking in a authoritarian personality type?

A
  • Rigid thinkers who obeyed authority
  • Saw world as black and white
  • Enforced strict adherence to social rules and heirarchies
33
Q

Adorno et al (1950) theory of authoritarian personality

A
  • Dispositional explanation of obedience
  • Over-strict parenting results in a child being socialised to obey authority unquestioningly
  • Aquire authoritarian attitudes through learning and imitation
34
Q

What did Adorno et al (1950) say about result of strict parenting?

A
  • Strict parenting means the child feels constrained which results in aggression
  • Child is afraid of expressing aggression towards parents so express it towards those they see as weak or inferior
35
Q

Who resigned the concept of authoritarian personality and how?

A
  • Altemeyer (1981)
  • Identifying a cluster of three of the original personality variables that he referred to as right-wing authoritarianism
36
Q

What 3 personality characteristics do high RWA possess that predispose them to obedience?

A
  • Conventionalism
  • Authoritarian aggression
  • Authoritarian submission
37
Q

Define Conventionalism

A

An adherence to conventional norms and values

38
Q

Define authoritarian aggression

A

Aggressive feelings towards people who violate the norms

39
Q

Define authoritarian submission

A

Uncritical submission to legitimate authorities

40
Q

Altemeyer (1981) experiment

A
  • Tested relationship between RWA and obedience
  • Ppts ordered to give themselves shocks for each wrong answer
  • Significant correlation between RWA and levels if shocks Ppts were willing to give themselves
41
Q

Key study into authoritarian personality and obedience

A

Elms and Milgram (1966)