Social Influence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is informative social influence?

A

Conforming/ agreeing with the majority because we believe them to be correct. We want to be right.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is normative social influence?

A

Conforming/ agreeing with the majority in order to be liked and gain social approval. We want to be liked.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the two explanations for conformity?

A

Informative social influence
Normative social influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is internalisation ?

A

We take on the majority view publicly and privately because we accept it as correct. Permanent type of conformity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is identification?

A

Temporary type of conformity whereby we publicly and privately accept the groups beliefs and behaviours.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is compliance?

A

Superficial and temporary type of conformity. We oublically agree with the majority but privately disagree.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the 3 types of conformity?

A

Compliance, identification, internalisation .

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the meaning of conformity?

A

A change in a persons behaviour or opinions as a result of real or imagines pressure from a person or a group of people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the procedure of Asch’s research?

A

50 male students were real participants and tested individually with a group of confederates.
Participants were tested in groups of 6-8 people.
Task: participants were shown a line and then 3 comparison lines. They were asked to identify which matched and to say their answer aloud.
At first the confederates gave the correct answers but started making errors,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were Asch’s findings?

A

Conformed to the majority and gave the wrong answer approx 32% of the time.
74% of participants conformed at least once.
26% of participants never conformed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are factors/ variables affecting conformity?

A

GROUP SIZE
Would changing the size of the group affect the conformity rates?
UNANIMITY
Would the prescence of a non-conforming person affect the conformity rates?
TASK DIFFICULTY
Would making the task harder affect conformity rates?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What were Asch’s variation findings?

A

When there was only one confederate conformity decreased as only 3% conformed.
When there were 3 confederates as the majority conformity rates decreased to 13%.
When there was up to nine confederates conformity rates stayed the same.
When Asch’s introduced a non-conformist who gave the correct answers but conformity rates decreases to 5.5% as the participants no longer felt alone.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is generalisability?

A

Can we generalise his finding to other populations?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is reliability?

A

The extent to which the measurement of a particular behaviour is consistent and we are able to replicate the study to check for this.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the meaning of applications?

A

The extent to which the findings can or have been applied and contributes to society in a practical way.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the two types of validity?

A

Internal
External

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is internal validity?

A

Whether the study is measuring what it intends to, has the IV clearly impacted the DV.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is external validity?

A

Whether the study reflects that behaviour/ example in real life outside of the study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are social roles?

A

The ‘parts’ we play as members of social groups.
For each social role there are experiences of what is appropriate behaviour.
E.g teacher, student

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What was the aim of Zimbardo’s research?

A

To investigate how people conform to the social roles they are given ( how quickly would people adopt the roles of prisoners and guards.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What was the procedure of Zimbardo’s research?

A

21 male university students from the US and Canada, volunteer sample.
They were all tested as “emotionally stable” and were offered $15 a day for their participation in a 2 week experiment.
They were randomly allocated as prisoners and guards.
Conducted in the basement of Stanford University.
The prisoners were ‘arrested’ at home, blindfolded and taken to the ‘prison’.
Prisoners were given smocks and a number.
Guards wore khaki uniforms, dark mirrored glasses and carried batons.
They were told they had complete power over prisoners.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What were the findings of Zimbardo’s research?

A

The first day was ‘boring’.
When it came to day 2 prisoners started rebelling by stacking their bed frames against their cells.
The guards later woke them up in the middle of the night and forced them to do tasks like clean the toilets with their bare hands.
A total of 4 prisoners left early.
The study ended on day 6, instead of the original 2 weeks planned

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What was the aim of Asch’s experiment?

A

To see whether individuals will conform to the opinion of others, even where the answer is certain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is obedience?

A

A form of social influence whereby an individual follows an order from an authority figure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What was the aim of Milgram’s study?

A

To investigate how far people would go in obeying the commands of an authority figure to cause harm to another person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What was the procedure of Milgram’s study?

A

40 American males were recruited, they believed was on learning and memory.
Milgram’s recruited his participants through a newspaper advertisement and they were paid $4.50 for taking part.
Milgram’s lab was in Yale University.
They were introduced to another participant called Mr Wallace (confederate, the one getting shocked)
The researcher drew lots to see who would be in that role of teacher vs learner but the draw was fixed so the participant was always the teacher and Mr Wallace was always the learner. (Deception)
Mr Wallace was strapped into a chair with electrodes attached while the teacher was in another room with a shock generator.
The shock generator contained 30 switches ranging from 15-450 volts.
The learner had to remember word pairs and every time he answered incorrectly, the teacher had to deliver a shock, with each error the voltage would increase.
Mr Wallace would sometimes verbally complain and ask for it to stop, whether the experimenter in response would say “The experiment requires you to continue”.
The experiment stopped when the participant refused of had reached the maximum of 450 volts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What were the findings of Milgram’s study?

A

65% continued to the highest level 450V
100% of participants administered shocks to 300V
Participants showed signs of extreme stress and anxiety. Three got so stressed they had ‘‘full blown, uncontrollable seizures.” (Protection from harm)
They were sent a follow up questionnaire a year later and 84% said they were glad they participated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Generalisability of Milgram’s research?

A

-lack of generalisability
-only used male American participants
Difficult to generalise Milgram’s findings to other populations, cultures, nationalities etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Reliability of Milgram’s research?

A

-ease of replication
-Milgram’s had full control over variables in an artificial environment
-standardise procedure
-easy for researchers to replicate his procedure in order to check for consistency of results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Milgrams 3 variations?
(situational variables)

A

Proximity
Location
Uniform

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What percentage did obedience drop to when the teacher and learner were in the same room?

A

Obedience dropped to 40%

32
Q

What percentage did obedience dropped to when to when the teacher had to force the learners hand onto the shock plate?

A

30%

33
Q

What percentage did obedience drop to when the experiment took place in a rundown block?

A

47.5%

34
Q

What percentage did obedience rates drop to when the experimenter was called away and was replaced by “a member of public” wearing ordinary clothes?

A

20%

35
Q

What is ‘legitimacy of authority’ as an explanation of obedience?

A

We are more likely to obey people who we perceive to have more authority over us. This authority is justifies by the individuals position within a social hierarchy.

36
Q

What is ‘destructive authority’ ?

A

When individuals in power abuse their power/ status/ authority

37
Q

What is ‘agency theory’ as an explanation of obedience?

A

The idea that individuals obey as they do not feel responsible for their actions (they are obeying as an agent)

38
Q

What is ‘agentic state’ ?

A

A mental state where we feel no personal responsibility for our behaviour because we believe ourselves to be acting for an authority figure (agent)
This frees us from potential conflict with ourselves

39
Q

What is ‘autonomous state’ ?

A

Being free/ independent and therefore behaving according to ones own principles and beliefs

40
Q

What are ‘binding factors’ ?

A

Aspects of a situation that allow someone to ignore or minimise the damaging effect of their behaviour. Individuals might also shift the responsibility onto the victim to ignore their damage further

41
Q

What is a strength of legitimacy of authority as an explanation of obedience?
(Bickman)

A
  • supported by research
    -Bickman, found that passers by are twice as likely to obey the individual dresses as a security guard compared to the individual dresses casually with a jacket and tie.
    -provides evidence to suggest that individuals are more likely to obey those who have uniform to suggest that they are an authority figure
42
Q

What is a weakness of legitimacy of authority as an explanation for obedience?

A

-previous evidence has shown that individuals will obey but not 100% of the time.
-significant minority were able to disobey regardless of the experimenters status and authority
-could be considered as incomplete explanation
-should consider individual differences and get some individuals might still decide to disobey those with perceived higher status

43
Q

What is a strength of agency theory as an explanation of obedience?

A

-Blass and Schmitt investigated reasons as to why participants obeyed the authority figure
-found that participants blamed the researcher
-evidence to suggest that participants feel comfortable to obey when they realise they are no longer responsible

44
Q

What is a weakness of agency theory as an explanation for obedience?
(limited view)

A

-has a limited view on the reasons for obedient behaviour
-explanation suggests that individuals will obey purely due to others and on behalf of authority figures.
-could be due to their own personality rather than the situation
-can be considered an incomplete explanation, should consider individual differences and why some individuals might still decide to disobey

45
Q

What is another weakness of agency theory as an explanation for disobedience?
(obedience alibi)

A

-gives a poor excuse for behaviour that is offensive
-obedient individuals behaved in horrific ways
-individuals are not taking responsibility for actions

46
Q

What is authoritarian personality?

A

A type of personality whereby an individual is susceptible to obey someone in authority

47
Q

What may the characteristics of someone with an authoritarian personality be?

A

-view someone with a higher status as authority
-look down and criticise those who they believe to be below them
-

48
Q

What causes someone to have an authoritarian personality?

A

-strict childhood experiences:
-harsh parenting
-strict discipline
-conditional love
-high expectations which were impossible to reach

49
Q

What was used to determine an authoritarian personality?

A

F- scale questionnaire

50
Q

What is a strength of authoritarian personality as an explanation of obedience?

A

-supported by research
-Milgram and Elms interviewed fully obedient participants from Milgrams study and found that those who obeyed and shocked to the full 450v scored higher on the f scale, compared to those who stopped
-evidence to suggest that people with a high f scale score are more likely to obey those in power
-increases the validity of the theory

51
Q

What is a weakness of authoritarian personality as an explanation for obedience?
(Cannot explain all cases of..)

A

-cannot explain all cases of obedient behaviour
-struggles to explain the behaviour of those in pre-war Germany.
-Milgram showed that variations such as uniform, proximity, location were primary causes of differences in participants levels of obedience, not authoritarian personality.
-could be considered an incomplete, limited explanation, can’t explain why people who have an authoritarian personality still obey

52
Q

What is a weakness of authoritarian personality as an explanation of obedience?
(flawed methodology)

A

-flawed methodology
-social desirability may cause people to answer the F-scale questionnaire incorrectly/untruthfully due to them wanting their personality to be seen a certain way
-this will cause incorrect results, if there’s incorrect results the whole theory is incorrect
-from inaccurate results on the questionnaire, questions the internal validity of the method used the measure the degree of authoritarianism

53
Q

What is another limitation of the authoritarian personality as an explanation for obedience?

A

-F-scale contains political bias
-F-scale only measures the tendencies towards extreme forms of right wing ideologies which is an issue as both right wing and left wing ideologies can be linked to an authoritarian personality.
-Adornos measurement and suggestions on an authoritarian personality could be considered incomplete as it does not consider the whole political spectrum

54
Q

What are the two explanations of resistance to social influence?

A

Social support
Locus of control

55
Q

What is social support as an explanation of resistance to social influence?

A

The presence of people who resist pressures to conform or obey can help others to do the same. These people act as models to show others that resistance to social influence is possible.

56
Q

Where is social support seen in Asch’s research?

A

Conformity decreased from 32% to 5.5% due to unanimity (introducing a non-conformer) participant no longer felt alone as someone was there to back them up.

57
Q

Where is social support seen in Milgram’s research?

A

Obedience rates would decrease due to unanimity
Rates of obedience dropped when the participant was joined by a disobedient confederate. Participants took charge of decisions.

58
Q

What is locus of control as an explanation of resistance to social influence?

A

Our perception on the amount of control we have over events that happen in our lives.

59
Q

What are the two types of locus of control?

A

Internal
External

60
Q

What is internal locus of control?

A

Believe that they are hugely responsible and in control of things that happen to them.
They are most likely to resist social influence

61
Q

What is external locus of control?

A

Believe that the things that happen to them are completely out of their control (a matter of luck outside forces)
Most likely to give in to social influence.

62
Q

What is a strength of social support as an explanation of resistance to social influence?
(can have positive outcomes)

A

-can have positive outcomes
-Albrecht et al evaluated an eight week programme
-help pregnant adolescents resist peer pressure to smoke
-found that providing a ‘buddy’ who was able to resist the pressure, less likely to smoke.
-provides evidence to suggest that participants felt more comfortable resisting pressure when there was someone else doing the same

63
Q

What is another strength of social support as an explanation of resistance to social influence?
(supported by research)

A

-supported by research

-Allen and Levine used one dissenter in an Asch type study
-wore thick glasses and admitted to having poor vision
-found that conformity decreased when this person was present and provided social support

-increases validity of the theory
-provides evidence to suggest that people are less likely to conform when there was someone else doing the same

64
Q

What is a strength of locus of control as an explanation of resistance to social influence?
(Supported by research)

A

-supported by research

-Holland repeated Milgram’s study and measured whether openly had either an internal or external locus of control
-found that 37% of internals did not continue to the maximum voltage as opposed to 23% in externals

-people with internal locus of control are more likely to resist obedience (a type of social influence)
-increases validity of this theory

65
Q

What is a limitation of locus of control as an explanation of resistance to social influence?

A

-research by Twenge questions locus of control

-found that young Americans were increasingly believing that their lives were determined more by luck or powerful others as opposed by their own actions.
-showed that they became more external yet also more resistant to obedience

-therefore questions the study as even those with external locus of control can resist and disobey
-incomplete explanation
-decreases validity of the theory

66
Q

What is minority influence?

A

A form of social influence whereby a small amount of people persuades others to adapt their beliefs, attitudes or behaviours
Serge Moscovici was one of the first psychologists to identify and study minority influence processes and behaviours.

67
Q

What are the three main behaviours and processes involved in a minority influence?

A

Consistency
Commitment
Flexibility

68
Q

What is consistency in minority influence?

A

Minority must be consistent with their views, keeping the same beliefs and behaviours over time.
Consistency will show togetherness within the minority (all saying the same thing and for some time now)

69
Q

What is commitment in minority influence?

A

The minority is more powerful if dedication is shown towards their position
-extreme activities, personal sacrifices

70
Q

What is flexibility in minority influence?

A

Accepting the possibility of a compromise shows flexibility from a minority.

71
Q

What is Moscovici’s research?
(Minority influence)

A
  • group of 6 people were asked to view a set of 36 blue- coloured slides that varied in intensity
    -had to state whether the slide was green or blue
    -each group contained 4 real participants, 2 confederates (all females)

-if participants were in the consistent group, two confederates described all slides as green, participants conformed to the minority and gave the wrong answer 8% of the time.
-if participants were in the inconsistent group, two confederates only described 24/36 slides as green rather than all), conformity rate was only 1.25%

72
Q

What can we conclude from Moscovici’s research?

A

-people conformed to the minority when the confederates were consistent with their beliefs and views rather than when people were inconsistent with their views

73
Q

Issues with Moscovici’s research?

A

-all females, cannot be generalised
-not an everyday situation, lacks external/ecological validity

74
Q

What is one strength of minority influence?
(Supported by research, Moscovici, counter argument)

A

-Moscovici found that during his study people conformed to the majority more when confederates were consistent with their answers (8% vs 1.25%)
-provides evidence to suggest that people conformed more to the minority when consistency is shown
-increases validity of theory
-however moscovicis findings cannot be generalised due to using all females

75
Q

One weakness of minority influence?
(Validity)

A

-lacks ecological validity
-many studies like moscovicis take place with artificial environments, using a trivial and artificial task
-limitation because research may not represent how minorities attempt to change the behaviour of majorities within real life social situations

76
Q

What is social change?

A

When whole societies adopt new attitudes, beliefs and ways of doing things

77
Q

What are the six steps involved in social change?

A
  1. Drawing attention to the issue, if individuals are exposed to the views of a minority, this can bring attention to the issue at hand
  2. Consistency, the minority will be more influential if they maintain their view point overtime and consistently express their arguments
  3. Deeper processing of the issue, the minority must inspire people to seriously consider their view i.e the majority should start to put themselves in the shoes of the minority
  4. the augmentation principle, the minority must sacrifice for their cause in order to show their determination and dedication to the issue
  5. The snowball effect, if the minority spreads their message widely and starts to grow, the minority overtime will become the majority
  6. Social cryptomnesia, the minority view is now the ‘norm’. The social change has occurred but sometimes people might not always remember when it occured