Social influence Flashcards
Define Social influence
The process by which individuals and groups change each other’s attitudes and behaviours.
Define legitimacy of authority
An explanation for obedience which suggests we are more likely to obey people who we perceive to have authority over us due to the position of power that they hold within the social hierarchy
Identify three features of an authoritarian personality
- Submissive to superiors
- Dismissive of inferiors
- Highly prejudiced
Explain how an authoritarian personality develops
An authoritarian personality develops from having a harsh parenting style in childhood. This harsh parenting style consists of strict discipline, criticism of failings and impossibly high standards. As the child cannot express their feelings to their parents so they displace these to others they deem weaker which is known as scapegoating.
Which scale measures the authoritarian personality?
The F-scale
Give limitations of the F-scale
- Has acquiescence bias - all questions are worded in the same direction
- Is politically biased- is very right wing, it does not account for left-wing authoritarianism
What does Milgram’s original study tell us about obedience?
Milgram’s study showed us that people obey those they consider to be authority figures. The results suggest that obeying authority is normal behaviour in a hierarchically organised society. We will obey orders that distress us and even go against our moral code
Outline two situational variables and the impact of these on obedience
- PROXIMITY - Describes the physical closeness between the person giving the order and the person receiving it. In Milgram’s variations study when the learner and teacher were in the same room the obedience level decreased to 40% from 65% in the original study, where they were in different room.
- UNIFORM - describes the outfit the person giving the order is wearing, in Milgram’s original study the experimenter wore a lab coat so was dressed smartly. In Milgram’s variations study the experimenter was switched with someone who wore casual clothes. Obedience levels dropped from 60% to 20% in this case
Define the agentic state
This is when individuals obey an order even if they are aware that it is wrong, because they feel that they are acting for an authority figure so feel no responsibility for their actions.
What keeps a person in the agentic state
Binding factors which allow a person to minimise the damaging aspects of their actions reduce the moral strain they feel. These can include:
- Guilt or anxiety about the thought of leaving
- Not wanting to appear rude/ arrogant
- unwillingness to break commitment to experimenter
- shifting responsibility to victim
- Denying the impact of their actions
Give two explanations why people are able to resist social influence
- Social support- this is when the presence of people helps others resist the pressures of conforming or obeying.
- Locus of control- describes a person’s perception of their control over behaviours, successes, failures and events. A person with a high internal locus of control believes they are responsible for their lives so are more likely to resist
What’s the difference between internals and externals
Internals believe they are responsible for what happens to them and that they direct their own lives whereas externals believe outside forces direct their lives and their lives and they do not have control
What are the two theories that Deutsch & Gerard proposed to explain conformity?
- Normative social influence- when you conform to fit and to be liked
- Informative social influence- when you conform due to the need to be right or correct
Define identification
This is when you go along with others because you have accepted their point of view and you identify with them
Give a limitation of Asch’s (1951) conformity study
Asch’s study has been criticised for being ‘a child of its time’. The 1950s was a conformist time in America so this could have been the reason for the results.
Perrin & Spencer (1980) found one conformity response out of 396 trials in a replicate of Asch’s study. This provides evidence that Asch’s results are not consistent over time