Social Influence Flashcards
What was Asch’s baseline procedure on conformity?
-123 American Male Ppts were tested individually, sitting last or next to last in a group of 8 confederates
-They were shown 2 line cards
-One was a ‘standard line’
-On the other was 3 comparison lines
-1/3 lines=same length as standard line
-2/3 was clearly different
-18 trails-on 12 of these the confederates have the same wrong answer.
Why did Asch devise an experience to measure conformity?
-Wanted to measure the extent that people confirmed to the opinion of others, even in a situation when the others’ answers were clearly wrong.
What did Asch find on his baseline study on conformity?
-Asch found that naïve ppts conformed 36.8% of the time.
-This shows a high level of conformity when the situation is unambiguous
-There were individual differences- 25% of the ppts never gave a wrong answer (never conformed)
-75% conformed at least once
What are the 3 variables investigated by Asch?
1- Group size
2-Unanimity
3-Task difficulty
Procedure for group size(Asch)
-Asch varied the number of confederates in each group between 1 and 15
(total group size between 2 and 16)
Findings for group size(Asch)
-The relationship between group size and level of conformity was curvilinear
-If there were 2 confederates, conformity to the wrong answer was 13.6%x
-When there were 3 confederates, conformity rose to 31.8%
-Above 3 confederates, conformity rate levelled off, adding more than 3 confederates made little difference.
Explanation of group size( Asch)
-People are very sensitive to the opinions of other people
-One confederate was enough to sway opinion.
Procedure for unanimity( Asch)
-Asch introduced a dissenting confederate- sometimes they gave the correct answer and sometimes a different wrong answer( but always disagreed with the majority)
Findings for unanimity (Asch)
-In the presence of a dissenter, conformity reduced on average a less than a 1/4 of the level it was when the majority was unanimous.
-Conformity reduced if dissenter gave right or wrong answer.
Explanation for unanimity(Asch)
-Having a dissenter enabled the naïve ppt to behave more independently.
Procedure for task difficulty(Asch)
-Asch made the line-judging task harder by making stimulus line and comparison lines more similar in length.
-Thus it was difficult to see differences between the lines
Findings for task difficulty (Asch)
-Conformity increased
Task difficulty explanation(Asch)
-The situation is more ambiguous, so we are likely to look to others for guidance and to assume they are right and we are wrong.
-This is ISI(plays a greater role when the task becomes harder).
A03- Limitation to Asch’s baseline study on conformity
L
P-the situation and task were artificial
E-Ppts knew they were in a research study (demand characteristics). The task was trivial and there was no reason NOT to conform.
E-Also Fiske argued Asch’s groups were not like real life groups.
L-This means the findings do not generalise everyday life(especially those situations where the consequences of conformity are important)
P-Asch’s findings have little application
E-Only American men were tested by Asch. Neto suggested that women might be more conformist, possibly because they are more concerned about social relationships and being accepted
S-Also the USA is an individualistic culture and studies in collectivist cultures(e.g. China) have found higher conformity rates(Bond and Smith).
L-This means Asch’s findings tell us little about conformity in women and people from some cultures.
Strengths of Asch’s Baseline study on conformity
S
P-One strength is other evidence to support Asch’s findings.
E-Lucas et all asked ppts to solve ‘easy’
and ‘hard’ maths problems.
Ppts were giving answers that falsely claimed to be from 3 other students.
E-The ppts conformed more often(agreed with the wrong answers) when the problems were harder.
L-This shows Asch was correct that task difficulty is one variable affecting conformity.