Social Influence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What was Asch’s baseline procedure on conformity?

A

-123 American Male Ppts were tested individually, sitting last or next to last in a group of 8 confederates
-They were shown 2 line cards
-One was a ‘standard line’
-On the other was 3 comparison lines
-1/3 lines=same length as standard line
-2/3 was clearly different
-18 trails-on 12 of these the confederates have the same wrong answer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why did Asch devise an experience to measure conformity?

A

-Wanted to measure the extent that people confirmed to the opinion of others, even in a situation when the others’ answers were clearly wrong.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did Asch find on his baseline study on conformity?

A

-Asch found that naïve ppts conformed 36.8% of the time.
-This shows a high level of conformity when the situation is unambiguous
-There were individual differences- 25% of the ppts never gave a wrong answer (never conformed)
-75% conformed at least once

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the 3 variables investigated by Asch?

A

1- Group size
2-Unanimity
3-Task difficulty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Procedure for group size(Asch)

A

-Asch varied the number of confederates in each group between 1 and 15
(total group size between 2 and 16)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Findings for group size(Asch)

A

-The relationship between group size and level of conformity was curvilinear
-If there were 2 confederates, conformity to the wrong answer was 13.6%x
-When there were 3 confederates, conformity rose to 31.8%
-Above 3 confederates, conformity rate levelled off, adding more than 3 confederates made little difference.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explanation of group size( Asch)

A

-People are very sensitive to the opinions of other people
-One confederate was enough to sway opinion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Procedure for unanimity( Asch)

A

-Asch introduced a dissenting confederate- sometimes they gave the correct answer and sometimes a different wrong answer( but always disagreed with the majority)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Findings for unanimity (Asch)

A

-In the presence of a dissenter, conformity reduced on average a less than a 1/4 of the level it was when the majority was unanimous.
-Conformity reduced if dissenter gave right or wrong answer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explanation for unanimity(Asch)

A

-Having a dissenter enabled the naïve ppt to behave more independently.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Procedure for task difficulty(Asch)

A

-Asch made the line-judging task harder by making stimulus line and comparison lines more similar in length.
-Thus it was difficult to see differences between the lines

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Findings for task difficulty (Asch)

A

-Conformity increased

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Task difficulty explanation(Asch)

A

-The situation is more ambiguous, so we are likely to look to others for guidance and to assume they are right and we are wrong.
-This is ISI(plays a greater role when the task becomes harder).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

A03- Limitation to Asch’s baseline study on conformity

A

L
P-the situation and task were artificial
E-Ppts knew they were in a research study (demand characteristics). The task was trivial and there was no reason NOT to conform.
E-Also Fiske argued Asch’s groups were not like real life groups.
L-This means the findings do not generalise everyday life(especially those situations where the consequences of conformity are important)

P-Asch’s findings have little application
E-Only American men were tested by Asch. Neto suggested that women might be more conformist, possibly because they are more concerned about social relationships and being accepted
S-Also the USA is an individualistic culture and studies in collectivist cultures(e.g. China) have found higher conformity rates(Bond and Smith).
L-This means Asch’s findings tell us little about conformity in women and people from some cultures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Strengths of Asch’s Baseline study on conformity

A

S
P-One strength is other evidence to support Asch’s findings.
E-Lucas et all asked ppts to solve ‘easy’
and ‘hard’ maths problems.
Ppts were giving answers that falsely claimed to be from 3 other students.
E-The ppts conformed more often(agreed with the wrong answers) when the problems were harder.
L-This shows Asch was correct that task difficulty is one variable affecting conformity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Types and conformity and definitions

A

Internalisation- When are person accepts group norms(public change and private change in opinion)
Think the group is right(the change is usually permanent)

Identification-Value the group. We identify with the group and publicly change our opinions/behaviours(even if we don’t privately agree with everything the group stands for)

Compliance-Temporary agreement. Involves ‘going along with others’ in public, but privately not changing opinions/behaviour.
This results in a superficial change and the opinion/behaviour stops as soon as group pressure ceases.

17
Q

What is ISI?

A

Informational social influence
-A desire to be right(e.g. in class going with the majority answer as they are probably right)
-A cognitive process(people generally want to be right-leads to internalisation)

18
Q

What is NSI?

A

Normative social influence
-A desire to behave like others and not look foolish
-Concerns what is “normal” behaviour and norms(regulates the behaviour of groups and individuals)
-Emotional rather than cognitive(leads to compliance-people prefer social approval rather than rejection).

19
Q

When does ISI occur?

A

Occurs in situations that are ambiguous
-ISI is more likely to occur in situations which are new and have some ambiguity(isn’t clear what is right)
-It may happen when decisions have to be made quickly, when we assume the group is likely to be right.

20
Q

When does NSI occur?

A

Occurs in unfamiliar situations and with people you know.
-Most likely in situations where you don’t know the norms and look to others about how to behave
-Can occur in situations with strangers as you don’t want to be rejected/people we know because of social approval.
-Pronounced in stressful situations where people need social support.

21
Q

When does NSI occur?

A

Occurs in unfamiliar situations and with people you know.
-Most likely in situations where you don’t know the norms and look to others about how to behave
-Can occur in situations with strangers as you don’t want to be rejected/people we know because of social approval.
-Pronounced in stressful situations where people need social support.

22
Q

Strengths of types and explanations

A

S
P-Research support for NSI
E-Asch found many ppts conformed rather than give the correct answer because they were afraid of disapproval.
E-When the ppts wrote down answers(no normative pressure)conformity fell to 12.5%
L-This shows that at least some conformity is due to a desire not to be rejected by the group for disagreeing with them.

P-Research support for ISI
E-Lucas et al found ppts conformed more to incorrect answers when maths problems were difficult(with easy problems, ppts “knew their own mind”)
E-For hard problems the situation was ambiguous(unclear)so they relied on the answers they were given.
L-This supports ISI because the results are what ISI would predict.

23
Q

Limitations of types and explanations of conformity

A

P-Individual differences in NSI
E-Some people are concerned about being liked by others(nAffiliators) who have a strong affiliation to relate to other people.
E-McGhee and Teevan found that students who were nAffiliators were more likely to conform.
L-This show NSI underlies conformity for some people more than for others-an individual difference not explained by a theory of situational pressures.

24
Q

Procedure for Zimbardo’s SPE

A

1-Mock Prison in the psych department at Stanford University
2- 21 Male Students were volunteers(emotionally stable only)
3-‘Prisoners’ were arrested in home by police and delivered to prison, blindfolded, strip searched, deloused and issued uniform and number.