Social Influence Flashcards
Types of Conformity
Compliance
Identification
Internalisation
Compliance
Type of conformity
External change of behaviour but internal disagreement with majority (group acceptance)
Comes from normative social influence (want to appear normal)
Internalisation
Type of conformity (strongest type)
Internal & external behavioural/belief change (genuine acceptance of group norms)
E.g., becoming vegan because you agree with your vegan roommate’s values.
Caused by informative social influence (want to be right)
Identification
Type of conformity
Conform to expectations of a role
External & internal behavioural change, only for however long they are associated with the role/group
E.g., teacher behaves & believes differently when they become a teacher but when they aren’t a teacher they may lose those beliefs/behaviours
Conformity VS Obedience
Conformity: Doing what the group does
Obedience: Doing what an authority figure tells you to do
Solomon Asch’s Line Study (1955) AIM
To find out the extent to which people would conform to an obviously wrong majority consensus
Solomon Asch’s (1955) Line Study PROCEDURE
123 male participants (Ps) told they were taking part in visual perception study
Ps put in groups with 7 and 9 confederates
18 trials where they’re shown a set of lines (A, B or C) and asked what was closest to the original line
In 12 critical trials, confederates all gave wrong answer & P was always asked last or second to last
Control group: 36 Ps asked same question when alone
Solomon Asch’s (1955) Line Study FINDINGS
Across all critical trials, participants conformed to the incorrect group consensus 32% of the time
75% of participants conformed to at least one incorrect answer
5% of participants conformed to every incorrect answer
This is compared to an error rate of just 0.04% in the control trials.
Variables effecting conformity (Asch)
Unanimity: if more people agree conformity is more likely
Group Size: increasing group size increased conformity up to 4 confederates (after 4, no increase in conformity)
Difficulty of Task: more difficult, more conformity
Other Variables: mood, gender, culture
Explanations of Conformity
Informational Social Influence: desire to be correct
Normative Social Influence: desire to be accepted by others/perceived as normal
Normative Social Influence
Desire to be accepted by others/perceived as normal
Informational Social Influence
Desire to be correct
Zimbardo et al (1973) Stanford Prison Experiment PROCEDURE
• Converted basement of Stanford Uni into fake prison for 2 weeks
• 21 male students selected from 75 for their mental stability
• Divided into 2 groups: 10 ‘guards’, 11 ‘prisoners’
• Prisoners arrested & put into cells in groups of 3 in cells
• Guards worked 8 hour shifts, told to refer to prisoners by assigned numbers
• Prisoners wore jackets with number and chain around ankle, guards wore khaki uniform & mirrored sunglasses, carried batons and handcuffs
Zimbardo et al (1973) Stanford Prison Experiment AIM
Find out how much people conform to the social roles of prisoner and guard in a prison situation
Zimbardo et al (1973) Stanford Prison Experiment FINDINGS
• Guards became increasingly sadistic
• Prisoners became increasingly obedient/submissive
• After 35 hours, one prisoner went “crazy” and had to be released, 3 others released throughout experiment
• Guards sadism became so harmful that Zimbardo stopped the experiment after 6 days instead of the scheduled 2 weeks