Social influence Flashcards
Conformity
Giving in to social or group pressure
Types of conformity
- Compliance
- Identification
- Internalisation
Compliance
Individuals publicly go along with the majority view but privately disagree with it. Temporary type of conformity
Identification
Individuals adopt the behaviour of the group because we value the group and group members. Don’t usually agree with everything group stands for
Internalisation
Individuals take on the expressed view publicly and privately. Deepest level of conformity leading to permanent change
Informational social influence
When people change their behaviour in order to be correct, in situations where we are unsure of the correct response we look to others who are more knowledgable
Normative social influence
When you conform to try and fit in and be accepted by other people and not be seen as the odd one out.
ISI evaluations
Beta bias
Practical applications
Doesn’t consider dispositional factors
NSI evaluations
Doesn’t consider dispositional factors
Practical applications
Beta bias
ASCH (1951) aim
To investigate the degree to which individuals would conform to a majority giving wrong answers
ASCH Procedure
- 123 American student volunteers took part in a study of visual perception
- Placed around a table of confederates
- Task was to state what comparison line A,b Or c was the same as the stimulus line
- 12 of these trials were critical whereby confederates were instructed to give incorrect answer
- Naive ppt gave his answer second last
ASCH Findings
- Control group had an error rate of only 0.04% showing how obvious answers actually were
- On 12 critical trials, there was a 32% conformity rate to wrong answers
- 75% of participants conformed to atleast one answer
ASCH Conclusions
Asch found the majority does have a significant effect on the minority even in obvious situations. Seems normative social influence is critical in persuading people
ASCH evaluations
Highly controlled lacking ecological validity and mundane realism
Culturally biased as it was done in 1950s
America cannot be generalised
Ethical issues - No full informed consent
ASCH’S Variations
- Difficulty of the task
- Group size
- Unanimity
Unanimity
The presence of a dissenting confederate led to reduced conformity suggesting the influence of the majority depends to some extent on the group being unanimous
Size of the majority
A group size of 3 led to conformity, but adding further confederates made little difference to whether the ppts conformed or not
Difficulty of task
Asch did other variations where he made the lines look much closer and this increased conformity as people were more unsure
Zimbardos aim
Aimed to investigate whether students would conform to a social role (either a prison guard or prisoner) that they were assigned to
Zimbardo procedure
- 75 Male university students responded to a newspaper advert offering $15 a day to take part.
- Ppts taken from their homes
- 21 most mentally and physically stable students were picked.
- 10 guards and 11 prisoners randomly allocated
- Prisoners dehumanised, deloused, fingerprinted and stripped
- Prisoners in bleak uniform, whilst guards given superior uniform with sunglasses and handcuffs.
- 9 prisoners were placed 3 to a cell
- Study was planned to run for 2 weeks but was cut short