social influence Flashcards

1
Q

What are the 3 types of conformity?

A

Identification
Compliance
Internalisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is internalisation?

A

Going along with the majority and their views. Their views become your views.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is compliance ?

A

Going along with the majority view in public but not sharing their views.
You go along with their views to fit in as you fear being rejected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is identification ?

A

Conforming to what is expected of you and your social role. Changing your behaviour to fit a specific role in society or intimate a role model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the two types of social influence?

A

Normative social influence
Informational social influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

APFC of Sheriff’s experiment into the effects of informational social influence

A

A- wanted to see whether people were influenced by others when carrying out an ambiguous task
P- Labatory experiment using repeated measures.
Sheriff used a visual illusion of a stationary dot which appears to move.
First. ppts were asked indviudally how far they thought they light had moved.
They were then put into groups of 3 where each of them discussed their estimate.
after this the pts were then individually asked their estimation.
F- The guesses made when alone varied a lot but when they made guesses in the presence of others the estimates were much closer to each other. When asked their own estimate when alone at the end most had changed from their original guess to the group guess.
C- The ppts estimates were influenced by the estimates of others. Ppts used information from others to from their estimate. This is informational social influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Evaluation of Sheriff

A

Strength- the experiment can be easily replicated due to it being a lab experiment which means any variables are controlled.
Strength- Due to lab experiment, cause and effect can be established.
Weakness- The study lacks ecological validity. Estimating how far a light had moved is an artificial task meaning it’s not often carried out in normal life.
Weakness- The study lacks population validity. The sample that was used was made up of only white males. These results don’t represent the entire population meaning it is hard to generalise them to everyone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

APFC of Asch’s research into the effects of normative social influence

A

A- wanted to see whether people would conform to a majorities incorrect answer in an unambiguous task

P- A laboratory experiment using independent groups. Ppts were put into groups of 8 and asked to judge line lengths by saying out loud which line 1,2,3 matched the control line they were shown. there was only 1 real ppt in the group the rest were confederates. The real ppt was always sat either second to last or last so that they could hear others answers before theirs. Each ppt carried out 18 trails in 12 of these the confederates all gave the same wrong answer. There was a control group were the ppt judged the line in isolation.

F- 75% OF ppts conformed and have the wrong answer at least once.
Ppts conformed to the majority 37% of the time.
In the control group, ppts got the answer wrong 0.7% of the time.
Some ppts admitted that they knew the answer was wring but agreed with others as they didn’t want to seem different.

C- the control group shows that it was an easy task to get right but that 37% of ppts answered incorrectly in the other group.
This suggests that the ppts conformed to the majority due to normative social influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Evaluation of Asch’s line study

A

Strength- The effects of extraneous variables are minimised due to variables being controlled as the study was a lab experiment
Strength- Study can be easily replicated to see if you get the same results
Weakness- Study lacks ecological validity. As ppts weren’t in a natural setting the task did not replicate real life.
Weakness- Ethical implications. The ppts were deceived.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What situational factors did Asch study?

A

1- Group size
2- Unanimity/ social support
3- Task difficulty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does group size effect conformity?

A

When the size of the group was changed so that there was only two confederates, the levels of conformity dropped to only 14%
When the amount of confederates increased to 3 the conformity levels increased to 32%.
Group size matters to a certain extent as the smaller the group the easier it is to not conform but influence does not keep increasing when group size does.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does Unanimity/ social support effect conformity?

A

Asch found that when he changed the study so that one of the confederates agreed with the ppt the rate of conformity dropped to 5.5% as it was now easier to resist the pressure to conform

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How does Task difficulty effect conformity?

A

Asch found that by making the task more difficult the levels of conformity rose as people are more likely to conform when they are less confident in their own knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

APFC of Zimbardo’s study into conforming to social roles

A

A- Wanted to see if people would conform to set social roles.

P- paid $15 a day
- had to do a personality test before
- responded to an advert, volunteers
- mostly students, all male
- all white middle class
- 10 guards, 11 prisoners
- zimbardo was prison superintendent]
- held in psychology basement at Stanford university
- prisoners arrested by real police, Palo Alto
- prisoners were dehumanised, smocks, numbers
- guards in military uniform, khaki, sunglasses

F– guards and prisoners accepted their roles
- guards became more sadistic
- de-individualisation as prisoners refer by numbers
- after 36 hours one prisoner released due mental stress
- 3 more prisoners also released due to metal stress
- prisoner revolt initially, hunger strikes
- 90% of prisoner conversations about prison life
- scheduled for 14 days. stopped after 6.
- guards became increasingly more aggressive
- all PP’s surprised by uncharacteristic behaviour shown

C-people conform to their social roles due to situational factors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Evaluation of Zimbardo

A

Weakness- the environment was artificial environment which means that the results are had to generalise to other settings.
Weakness- There are many ethical issues within this study such as deception . The ppts were not told that they would be arrested from their homes . This could have caused the ppts psychological harm.
Weakness- There is observer bias within the study. Zimbardo was the one who ran the experiment and was involved throughout even revealing that he became to involved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Procedure of Milgram’s study in obedience

A

P- he conducted many lab experiments in which he tested factors which ae meant to have an effect on obedience.
- took place at yale university
-used 40 male ppts who applied through and advert in the paper
-they were paid for attending the study
- experimenter wore a grey technicians coat
-ppt was introduced to a confederate
-ppt was always the teacher
-ppt witnessed the confederate being strapped to a chair and connected to a shock generator
-teacher asked a number of questions, if the confederate got them wrong the teacher was to give them a shock increasing 15v each time.
-when the teacher got 300v the learner banged on the wall and then made no further responses.
-if the ppt hesitated when giving the shocks, they were encouraged to continue by the experimenter.
-after the experiment the ppts were debriefed.

17
Q

Findings of Milgram’s study into obedience

A

655 of ppts went up to 450 volts
none stopped before 300 volts
ppt showed signs of distress such as sweating

18
Q

Conclusion of Milgram’s obedience study

A

He concluded that ordinary people will obey orders to hurt someone even if it means acting against their own conscious

19
Q

Evaluation of Milgram

A

Weakness
- the study lacks ecological validity as the ppts did a task very unlikely to ever do again in their everyday life.
Weakness
-Ethical issues- the study contains ethical issues as the ppts were deceived as they didn’t know the true intent of the study. This means informed consent could not of been gathered
- They were not reminded of their right to withdraw as when they did not want to continue they were encouraged to continue
Weakness-
-The ppts were paid for taking part in the study meaning that their reasoning for continuing in the experiment may not have been because they were obeying but just they wanted the money.
Strength
-However, the study was a lab experiment meaning that variables were able to be controlled which allows for cause and effect to be established.

20
Q

What were the situational factors that Milgram identified which effected obedience?

A

1) proximity of the victim- found that when the ppt was in the same room as the leaner obedience dropped to 40% and further dropped to 30% when the ppt had to put the leaner’s hand on the shock plate.
2) Proximity of authority- when the orders were given over the phone, obedience dropped to 23% as pressure to obey is easier to resist.
3) location of the experiment- when the location was moved to a run down office block the amount of ppt who gave the highest shock dropped to 48% as the experimenter seemed less legitimate

21
Q

What is Milgram’s agency theory?

A
  • idea that people are working in an agentic state meaning that they are working as someone’s agent so don’t take responsibility for their actions
    -Milgram’s theory stated that when acting for someone else we feel less responsible for our actions
    -this can be seen in the obedience study as the ppt often asked who would take responsibility if the leaner was harmed
    -when reassured that it would not be their responsibility the ppt would often carry on.
    -people can start as thinking for themselves (autonomously) but then become obedient through an agentic shift.
22
Q

What were the binding factors that kept Milgram’s ppt in the agentic state?

A

1) Reluctance to disrupt the experiment
-they had already been paid before taking part and therefore may have felt obliged to continue
2) The pressure of surroundings
-the experiment took place in a prestigious university which made the experimenter loo like a legitimate authority
3) The insistence of the authority figure
-if ppts hesitated they were told they had to continue.

23
Q

Bickman legitimate authority

A
  • Bickman carried out an experiment to see out of a guard, milkman and a smartly dressed individual would people take orders from
  • Found that people obeyed the orders from the guard more than others as he seemed the most legitimate authority figure.
24
Q

How can an authoritarian personality affect obedience?

A
  • proposed by Adorno
    -he proposed that over-strict parenting can result in a child being socialised to obey authority without questioning it because of the strict up bringing
    -idea that strict parenting can lead to prejudice as the child is in constant fear of discipline if they show aggression to parents
    -so they become hostile to those who seem weak typically minority groups
25
Q

What is the F-scale?

A

a way to measure how strongly people express authoritarian traits.