social influence - 1.2 Flashcards

Conformity to social roles as investigated by Zimbardo.

1
Q

zimbardo’s procedure

A

zimbardo set up mock prison in the basement of the psychology department

volunteer sample paid $15 a day

the students were randomly assigned the roles of guards and prisoners

to heighten the realism of the study, the “prisoners” were arrested in their homes

they were blindfolded, strip-searched and issued a uniform and number

the social roles of the prisoners and the guards were strictly divided

the “guards” were given a uniform and were told they have complete power over the prisoners

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

social roles

A

patterns of behaviour expected in social positions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

zimbardo’s sample

A

volunteer sample

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

zimbardo’s findings

A

the guard’s behaviour became a threat to the prisoners’ psychological and physical health, and the study was stopped after six days instead of the intended 14 days

within two days, the prisoners rebelled against their harsh treatment by the guards

they ripped their uniforms, and shouted and swore at the guards, who retaliated with fire extinguishers

the guards employed “divide and rule” tactics by playing the prisoners against each other

the guards identified more and more with their role

their behaviour became more brutal and aggressive, with some of them appearing to enjoy the power they had over the prisoners

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

zimbardo’s research conclusion

A

the simulation revealed the power of the situation to influence people’s behaviour

guards, prisoners and researchers all conformed to their roles within the prison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

criticism of the study: lack of realism

A

could be argued the participants were merely play-acting rather than genuinely conforming to a role

their performances were based on stereotypes of how prisoners and guards are supposed to behave

however, zimbardo said there was quantitative data gathered that said that 90% of the conversations between prisoners was about prison life suggesting that they did believe it was real.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

dispositional hypothesis

A

proposes that both prisoners and guards have personalities that make conflict inevitable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what hypothesis was dominant regarding prison behavior before the stanford prison experiment?

A

dispositional hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how were participants selected for the stanford prison experiment?

A

via a newspaper advert for volunteers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how many participants were selected for the study?

A

25 students

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

purpose of prisoners wearing uniform

A

to promote anonymity among participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

where was the mock prison set up?

A

basement of stamford university

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how long was the study supposed to last for?

A

2 weeks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

why did the experiment finish early?

A

threat to physical and psychological health

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

how did one of the prisoners rebel?

A

hunger strike

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what does the study suggest about the impact of social roles?

A

social roles influence behaviour

17
Q

criticism of the experiment’s sample

A

all participants were american male college students who volunteered

lacks population validity

questions extent of generalisation to others

18
Q

demand characteristics in the context of this study?

A

participants changed behaviour to fit expectations

19
Q

how did zimbardo’s dual role affect the study?

A

raised questions about the validity

on one occasion a student who wanted to leave the study spoke to zimbardo in his role of superintendent

zimbardo responded as a superintendent worried about his prison rather than as a researcher with responsibilities towards his participants

20
Q

limitation regarding ecological validity in the context of this study

A

mock prisons differ from real prisons

e.g. there were no consequences for misbehaviour which would extend sentence as maximum sentence was 2 weeks

21
Q

what criteria were used to select participants for the experiment?

A

stable, mentally and physically

least antisocial

22
Q

how has the study been praised?

A

careful selection of participants

e.g. they were emotionally stable and least involved in anti-social behaviour

23
Q

how is the study internally valid?

A

reduced participant variables and researcher bias by random allocation into different groups

24
Q

how might the study be ecologically valid?

A

the prison was visited by a prison consultant for over 16 years, a public defender and a prison chaplain

the depressed effect the study had on some of the prisoners as well as the willingness on the part of some of the guards to work overtime for no extra pay pointed to a level of reality