Social Exchange Theory Flashcards

1
Q

What is social exchange theory?

A
  • the likelihood of a person staying in a relationship is determined by an assessment of what they get out of a relationship compared to what they put in, and how the relationship measures up against what they expect and what they might achieve in a different relationship.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What assumption is at the centre of social exchange theory?

A
  • that all behaviour is a series of exchanges (individuals attempt to maximise their rewards and minimise their costs)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What do people hope to earn from their relationship?

A
  • profit
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are some examples of rewards which may be achieved from a relationship?

A
  • companionship, being cared for and sex
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are some examples of costs?

A
  • financial investment and time wasted/missed opportunities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does rewards minus costs equal?

A
  • the outcome for that relationship (overall profit/loss)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does social exchange theory stress that commitment to a relationship is dependent on?

A
  • the profitability of the outcome of rewards minus costs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a comparison level?

A
  • Thibaut and Kelly proposed that we develop a comparison level which is a standard against which all our relationships are judged.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a comparison level the product of?

A
  • our experiences in other relationships together with our general views of what we might expect from this particular exchange.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How will a relationship be deemed worthwhile based on our comparison levels?

A
  • if the potential profit in a new relationship exceeds our CL then that relationship will be judged as worthwhile.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why might someone have a low CL?

A
  • if they have previously had an unpleasant or unsatisfying relationship.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why might someone have a high CL?

A
  • if they had previously had very rewarding relationships so would have high expectations for the quality of any future relationships.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When is a romantic relationships more likely to have a greater degree of solidarity?

A
  • if both partners outcomes or perceived profits are above their comparison level.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a comparison level for alternatives?

A
  • where a person weighs up a potential increase in rewards from a different partner, minus any costs associated with ending the current relationship.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What happens if alternatives are more appealing?

A
  • there will be a temptation for the individual to leave their current relationship and start a new one elsewhere.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Evaluation - The Problem Of Costs And Benefits

A
  • Problem = the confusion of what constitutes as a cost and a benefit
  • What might be considered rewarding to one person (e.g. constant attention), may be considered punishing to another (may be perceived as irritating).
  • What might be seen as a benefit at one stage of the relationship may be seen as a cost at another juncture as partners may redefine something they previously perceived as rewarding or punishing.
  • It is difficult to classify all events in such simple terms as ‘costs’ or ‘benefits’ and challenges the view that all romantic relationships operate this way.
17
Q

Evaluation - Evidence For The Influence Of Comparison Level For Alternatives

A
  • Sprecher: Longitudinal Study - 101 dating couples at a US university found that the exchange variable most highly associated with relationship commitment was partners comparison level for alternatives.
  • This showed that the presence of alternatives was consistently and negatively correlated with both commitment and relationship satisfaction for both males and females. So, in relationships where comparison level for alternatives was high, commitment to, and satisfaction, with the current relationships tended to be low.
  • Sprecher suggests that this is not surprising as those who lack alternatives are likely to remain committed but also those who are satisfied and committed to their relationships are more likely to devalue alternatives.
18
Q

Evaluation - Culture Bias

A
  • Economic theories reflect a Western, individualistic cultural bias (assumes voluntary and temporary nature of relationships) where there is free choice in terms of choosing a partner and in terms of entering into/leaving a relationship. Therefore this theory may not apply cross culturally.
  • Reflects a capitalist perspective to view relationships in terms of costs, rewards and profits.