Social Distribution of Crime Flashcards
Police recorded crime
- All crimes reported to and recorded by the police
- Forces around the country record crime in categories that are outlined in the Home Office counting rules
- Eg violence against the person, sexual offences, robber, burglary, theft, handling stolen goods, fraud etc etc
-
Dark Figure of Crime: crimes that do not appear in the official statistics
↳ at least 50% of all crimes do not end up in the police statistics - Crime is Socially Constructed: lack validity and are the result of ‘social processes’
Official Crime Statistics
- Crime recorded by the police and processes through the CJS
- Key source of information in relation to trends and patterns in criminality and victimisation
Strengths
- Measures acts deemed as criminal and are not reliant upon the victims interpretation of whether it was a crime
- Complied by official government agencies each year and can be compared with previous years
- Help decide policing budgets by predicting the level of crime that the police will have to deal with in the coming year
Weaknesses
- Subject to the changing priorities of government agencies and some crimes may not be considered worthy of investigation
- May be manipulated to show falling levels of crime to meet government targets
- Not all crimes are reported to the police, nor are all crimes reported to the police recorded as offences
Crime Survey
- A yearly survey which aims to gain a better picture of levels of criminality in the UK than that offered by official police stats
- Primarily a victim survey in which a representative sample of the public are asked about crimes they have been victims of in the proceeding 12 months
Strengths
- Captures the ‘dark figure of crime’
- Higher validity as it relies upon first-hand information from those that have been victims of crime
- Gives a more complex picture of crime in England and Wales and can be used to create initiatives and lead to policy reforms
- Representative: uses a large sample
- Repeated annually so can compare the amounts of crime per year
- Collects data on people’s perceptions of crime which is useful in policy formation
Weaknesses
- Fails to capture victimless crime such as prostitution and drug use
- Estimate of the amount of crime in the UK
- Relies upon subjective interpretation of individuals as to whether a crime has been committed
- Relies of people remembering the last 12 months and whether they have been the victims of a crime
- Respondents may not be aware they have been a victim of crime eg fraud
Self-Report Studies
- Measurement or crime where people are asked to talk about the crimes they have committed
- Produces useful data about anti-social behaviour and petty crime but it is unlikely to reveal much more about more serious crimes
Strengths
- Uncovers hidden figures of crime
- Can find out about victimless crime
- Talks directly to offenders, giving more detail than what would be given in a police report
- Simple, cost effective
- Good validity
- Useful for trying to determine if there is a systematic bias in the CJS that might result in certain types of offenders being more likely to be processed as categorised as criminals
Weaknesses
- Peer pressure affects validity/social desirability
- Exaggeration/Lie
- Mainly carried out on young people so they may be biased
- Unlikely to admit committing serious crimes
- Questions may be misunderstood
Linking to Theory and Methods
- Positivists: early sociological theories were based on an unethical acceptance of the accuracy of official crime statistics
- Interpretivists: the labelling view reflects the accuracy of crime statistics and concentrates on the understanding the way they they are socially constructed
-
Marxist: law and it’s enforcement rejects the interests of the ruling class as the crimes of the poor are strictly enforced and the immoral activities of the rich are ignored/not defined as criminal
↳ statistics will reflect these inequalities and scapegoating -
Feminists: crime statistics do not reflect the amount of crime against women (eg sexual attacks and DV)
↳ these often occur in a private domestic setting in which the police are reluctant to get involved and many women do not feel they can report these offences -
Left Realist: crime is a genuine problem, especially for poorer groups in society
↳ crime statistics cannot simply be reflected as inaccurate
↳ favour detailed victims surveys in local areas and these can reveal the basis for many peoples genuine fear of crime
Victimology
- Study of victims of crimes
- Important because they play an essential role in the criminal justice process
- They detect crimes, offenders and act as witnesses and have an impact on how punishments are given
- Victim = those who have suffered harm (mental/physical/emotional) economic loss or impairment of the their basic rights
- The term victim is often a social construct, the media and CJS paint a certain picture of the victim
-
Miers (Positivist): mainly concerned with factors affecting rates or victimisation measured in statistical studies
↳ victimisation surveys like the CSEW supplement official statistics in understanding victims in a number of ways
Key features of positivist victimology
- Identifying factors that produce patterns on victimisation: especially the those making some individuals or groups more prone to being victims
- Focuses on interpersonal crimes of violence
- Aims to identify victims and ho have contributed to their own victimisation
Social Class and Crime
- Class background is correlated with both the amount and type of offending
- Social class = a system of stratification; division of a society based on social and economic status
-
Murray - Underclass: long term unemployed, the welfare dependent, work shy group at the bottom who were prone to criminality and poorly socialised their children
↳ said to blame the worst off in society, downplaying other factors and confusing poverty with criminality
↳ David Cameron - Troubled Families Programme: aimed to turn around the lives of 120k of the worst families because they were causing ‘trouble’ and they are the source of a large proportion of the problems in society (drug addiction, alcohol abuse, crime)
Statistics on Social Class and Crime
Deprivation, Class and Prison Statistics
- Prisoners: 43% had no educational qualifications, only 6% had a degree or equivalent, 36% had been unemployed when sentenced, 60% had been claiming benefits
- 67% were unemployed prior to imprisonment, 32% were homeless, 27% had been bought up in care
Self-Report Studies
- 2003-2006: found that the social class of the family, based on the occupation of the chief wage earner, was not significantly associated with the likelihood of offending and drug use
- It was not social class, but individual circumstances that seemed more important
- Self-reported offending was found to be statistically associated with single parent families, having a parent living with a new partner, inconsistent parental discipline, attending a poorly disciplined school or having a friend/sibling who had been in trouble with the law
↳ suggested factors relating to social control influence whether young people are likely to commit offences, whereas social class has a stronger influence on whether you’re criminalised in the CJS
Consensus theories - Social Class and Crime
Merton’s Strain Theory
- Saw crime as resulting from anomie: an over-emphasis on sticking to the legitimate, accepted and legal means of achieving these goals
- The working class had restricted opportunities to succeed in American society and were therefore likely to turn to illegitimate ways to achieving those goals
Albert Cohen - Status Frustration
- Most crime from delinquent boys was non-utilitarian; it was not about money or success but was often destructive and apparently pointless (eg vandalism/joyriding)
- Crime took place in groups/subcultures as they seemed to thrive off encouragement from their friends
-
’Status Deprivation’: lack in prestige/respect - the boys were looked down on by teachers and others and failed to achieve academic success
↳ in order to get status, they got together with others in a similar situation and they gave each other status for breaking the norms of society
Cloward and Ohlin
- Illegitimate opportunity structures: opportunities to succeed where there was organised crime but using illegitimate means, leading to the development of criminal subcultures in some working class areas
- In other areas, there was little organised crime so there was more use of violence to achieve status in conflict subcultures
- Double failures, who had not found success in the conflict/criminal subcultures became retreatists
Hirschi - Bond of Attachment
- Attachment, commitment, involvement, belief
- 22% of people claiming out of work benefits had a criminal record
Limitations of consensus theories in explaining the higher rates of offending by working classes
-
Postmodernists: nature of subcultures has changed as they are much more common today than they were in the 1960s
↳ in society today, deviance and subcultures are ‘normal’ which renders the whole of subcultural theory irrelevant in helping us to understand crime and deviance -
David Matea - Subterranean Values: deviant values that encourage us to go against social norms
↳ these are usually held under control, but sometimes emerge at peak leisure times
↳ difference between a persistent offender and a law abiding citizen is simply how often and in what circumstances that these subterranean value’s emerge
Interactionism - Social Class and Crime
- Interactionist would point to the social construction of crime
- Question the validity of crime statistics in relation to the labels that may be applied to different situations
- Cicourel: police and juvenile officers
Marxism - Social class and crime
- Capitalism is crimogenic
- Capitalism encourages individuals to pursue self-interest before everything else
- Capitalism encourages individuals to be materialistic consumers, making us aspire to an unrealistic and often unattainable lifestyle
- Capitalism generates massive inequality and poverty which are correlated with higher crime rates
- Crimes of the elite are more costly than street crime (white collar & corporate crime) - Bernie Madoff
- David Gordon: capitalist societies are dog eat dog societies
- David Rothkopf: superclass at the very top
- Zygmunt Bauman: the super wealthy have effectively segregated themselves from the wealthy leading to economic and violent street crime
- William Chambliss: drug dealers see themselves and entrepreneurs
- Lauren Snider: many people die from industrial accidents, unsafe and usually illegal consumer products, occupationally induced diseases and hundreds of thousands of cancer deaths by legal and illegal environmental pollution
- Tombs and Dr Whyte: Britains construction industry is one of the most dangerous and in the last 25 years, over 2800 people have died from injuries they received as a result of construction work
Right Realist - Social Class and Crime
- Working class/underclass as being responsible for a disproportionate amount of crime in society
-
Murray - Underclass: people defined by deviant behaviour and fail to socialise their children properly so they fail to learn self-control and the difference between right and wrong
↳ increasing welfare dependency, lone mothers are ineffective agents of socialisation
↳ NEETS: would cost the country £15 billion by the time they died prematurely in 2060
↳ Limitations: people may first be targeted by labelling, overly concerned with street crime (ignoring crimes of the elite/ones which are costly and harmful) -
Wilson and Kelling - Broken Windows Theory: leaving broken windows unrepaired, tolerating aggressive behaviour etc sends a signal no one cares
↳ absence of both formal social control and informal social control & so the area becomes a magnet for deviance
Left Realist - Social Class and Crime
Lea and Young
- Relative deprivation
- Marginalisation
- Subculture
Limitations
- Should tackle structural issues as the causes of crime that primarily lie in the unequal structure of society
↳ major structural changes are needed to reduce levels of offending -
Young et al: we need to deal with the social inequalities of society such as the unfairness of rewards and the inequality of opportunity
↳ eg provide decent housing and jobs
Ethnicity and Crime
- Both Black and Asian people are more likely to be stopped and searched than Whites
- Black people are 3x as likely to be sent to prison compared to whites
- Whites report the highest overall levels of offending compared to all other ethnic minority groups
- Different levels of victimisation amongst various ethnic groups
- Just over half of adults arrested in London were from minority ethnic groups
- Two-thirds of children arrested in London were from minority ethnic groups
- Minority ethnic groups are over represented at many stages throughout the CJS compared with the White ethnic group
- Black people are 9x more likely to be stopped and searched, 2x more likely to be arrested and 3x more likely to be sent to jail