social cognition: theory of mind (ToM) Flashcards

1
Q

what did Meltzoff provide evidence for?

A

toddlers have an understanding of adult intentions when carrying out simple actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how old were the children in Meltzoff’s [intentional reasoning] study?

A

about 18 months old

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what happened in the experimental condition of Meltzoff’s study?

A

adults appeared to struggle placing beads in a jar + some fell outside

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what happened in the control condition of Meltzoff’s study?

A

adults placed beads successfully in the jar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what did Meltzoff find + conclude?

A

~ in both conditions, toddlers placed beads successfully in the jar - they dropped no beads, even in experimental condition
~ this suggests that they were imitating what the adult intended to do, rather tan what the adults actually did

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what was the procedure for false belief tasks?

A

~ children were told a story in which Maxi left his chocolate in a BLUE cupboard in the kitchen then went to the playground
~ later, Maxi’s mum used some of his chocolate for her cooking then placed the remainder in a GREEN cupboard
~ where will Maxi look for his chocolate when he comes back from the playground?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

how old were the children in the ‘false belief tasks’ study?

A

3-4 years old

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what were the findings for the ‘false belief tasks’ study?

A

~ most 3-year-olds incorrectly say that Maxi will look in the GREEN cupboard as they assume that Maxi knows that his mum moved the chocolate
~ most 4-year-olds correctly identified the BLUE cupboard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what was the sample in the Sally-Anne study?

A

20 autistic children, 27 non-autistic children, and 14 children with Down-syndrome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what was the procedure for the Sally-Anne study?

A

Sally places a marble in her basket, but when she isn’t looking, Anne moves the marble to her own box - the task is to work out where Sally will look for her marble

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what did Baron-Cohen et. al. find + conclude for the Sally-Anne study?

A

85% of children in control groups correctly identified where Sally would look for her marble, but only 20% of autistic children identified this
~ this shows that autism involves a ToM deficit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what requires an understanding of Sally’s false belief?

A

understanding that Sally doesn’t know where Anne has moved the marble to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

how do we test older children/adults for autism?

A

Eyes Task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what do you have to do in the Eyes Task?

A

read complex emotions in pictures that only show a small area around the eyes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what did Baron-Cohen find + conclude from the Eyes Task?

A

~ many autistic adults without a learning disability struggled with the Eyes Task
~ this supports the idea that ToM deficits may be a cause of autism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

why did Baron-Cohen develop the Eyes Task?

A

autistic adults/older children were able to succeed on false belief tasks, therefore Baron-Cohen developed a study that was better suited to older people

16
Q

what are 2 limitations of this research?

A

~ false belief tasks may have serious problems of validity
~ research techniques fail to distinguish ToM from perspective-taking

18
Q

why may false belief tasks lack validity?

A

~ false belief tasks require other cognitive abilities such as visual memory
~ failure on a false belief task may therefore be due to a deficit in memory rather than ToM

19
Q

how may it be difficult to distinguish between ToM + perspective-taking in intentional reasoning tasks?

A

a child may be visualising the beads task from the adult perspective rather than expressing a conscious understanding of the adult’s intention

20
Q

how may it be difficult to distinguish between ToM + perspective-taking in the Sally-Anne study?

A

a child may be switching perspective between Sally + Anne

22
Q

what is one strength of this research?

A

it has a real-world application

23
Q

what is one explanation for why autistic people may find social interaction difficult?

A

they may not fully understand what others are thinking - this may be why they find ToM tasks challenging

24
Q

what is one counterpoint to ‘real-world application’?

A

ToM doesn’t provide a complete explanation for autism

25
Q

what can’t a lack of ToM explain?

A

cognitive strengths of autistic people

26
Q

what is one explanation for ToM that supports Piaget’s view?

A

ToM is an innate ability which develops alongside other cognitive abilities as a result of maturity

27
Q

what is one explanation for ToM that supports Vygotsky’s view?

A

ToM develops as a consequence of interactions with others - it is gradually internalised