Social Cognition and Emotion Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Definition of social cognition.

A

Thinking about the actions and intentions of others, with individual differences in capacities and frequency of use.
e.g. Theory of mind, empathy, emotion recognition, shared imagining and episodic memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Theory of Mind?

A

A component of social cognition which is the understanding that people’s actions are motivated by internal mental states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How do 1-year-old infants display precursors to Theory of Mind?

A
  • Imitation: building understanding of others’ actions and differentiating with own actions
  • Joint attention: being aware of others’ visual experience and differentiating from own experience
  • Pretend play: taking on other perspectives, while distinguishing between reality and fantasy
  • Emotion understanding: identifying and understanding causes of 6 basic emotions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are Wellman’s two stages of ToM development?

A
  • Desire psychology (age 2): understanding that people’s behaviours are driven by their desires
  • Belief-desire psychology (age 4): understanding that desires are led by their opinion on the desired object/action
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the diverse beliefs stage of ToM Development?

A

The understanding that different people can hold different beliefs about the same object/event, and these beliefs will guide their behaviour regarding the object

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the knowledge access stage of ToM development?

A

The understanding that seeing an object/event grants the viewer the knowledge of that object

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the false belief stage of ToM development?

A

The understanding that beliefs can be false, but people with those false beliefs will still act in accordance with them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the hidden emotion stage of ToM development?

A

The understanding that there can be a difference between how an individual feels compared to what they are experiencing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the proposed 6th stage of ToM development by Peterson and colleagues?

A

The understanding that there can be a difference between what an individual says compared to what they mean

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the levels of visual perspective-taking?

A
  • Basic ability emerges in first year
  • Level 1: inferring what objects the other person can and cannot see (from 2 years)
  • Level 2: mentally computing how a scene looks from another person’s perspective (from 6-7 years)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the cognitive/emotional form of perspective-taking?

A

The ability to imagine and understand why others think and feel as they do, and how this can differ from one’s thoughts and feelings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Definition of empathy

A

The ability to understand, be aware of and sensitive to and vicariously experiencing the experience of another without having that experience fully communicated explicitly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How does cognitive/emotional perspective-taking change during adolescence?

A
  • Around 12 years, becoming more capable of holding multiple mental representations of differing perspectives simultaneously
  • Drawback of wondering how others perceive you, and understanding opinions and feelings might not be mutual
  • Prefrontal cortex still developing, associated with social cognition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Empirical evidence of adolescents’ ability to perspective-take and their tendency to do so.

A
  • 158 teens from US
  • Took a survey for perspective-taking tendency, rating themselves
  • Took a survey about beliefs on gender roles
  • Procedure: Gave the teens a vignette and asked about the motivations of the characters, what they were thinking and feeling.
  • Results: perspective-taking ability increased with age, but tendency and ability not significantly correlated. Girls more accurate with their ability and tendency. Boys had increase with ability over time, but tendency decreased.
  • Implications: the increase in ability of perspective taking does not equate to an increasing tendency to do so
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How does cultural influence impact the stages of ToM development?

A

Children from individualistic cultures (e.g. US, Germany) normally achieve the diverse beliefs stage before knowledge access. Children from collectivistic cultures (e.g. China, Turkey) normally achieve knowledge access stage before diverse beliefs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does the individualistic form of socialising emphasise?

A

The parenting style is centred on developing the child as an independent individual, differing from other peers.

17
Q

What does the collectivistic form of socialising emphasise?

A

The parenting style is centred on fostering interpersonal relatedness to promote harmony through conforming to cultural norms.

18
Q

What are some factors to different families socialisation?

A
  • Metropolitan vs rural
  • Family/individual differences
  • Environmental factors
  • Parenting style: authoritarian vs authoritative
19
Q

What are some features of authoritarian parenting?

A

Lower warmth, punitive discipline (e.g. grounding, spanking), does not encourage freedom of expression and decision making

20
Q

What are some features of authoritative parenting?

A

High warmth, inductive discipline (consequences for behaviour explained), encourages freedom within certain extents. Children tended to develop ToM earlier, as differences are explained often.

21
Q

Definition of morality

A

The ability to distinguish right from wrong (cognition), act on this distinction (behaviour), and feel pride when doing the right thing and guilt when not (emotion).

22
Q

Empirical evidence for morality in infants.

A

Method: puppets shown to 3 month olds in either a morally appropriate way (helping them) or a morally appropriate way (cutting them off).
Results: infants show concern in the second scenario, measuring facial expression (body posture, smile, eyebrows)

23
Q

Definition of prosocial behaviour

A

When one voluntarily acts to benefit others, at either a high or low cost to self.

24
Q

What are the categories of prosocial behaviour?

A

Comforting: showing emotional distress and offering help (one party benefits)
Cooperating: action of working together towards common goal (both benefit)
Sharing: giving up resources for the benefit of others (one party benefits)
Helping: giving up time and energy for the benefit of others (one party benefits)
Demonstration of prosocial behaviour varies with age

25
Q

Explanations on why we help.

A

Proximate (how) explanations: development (how the trait emerge over lifespan) and mechanism (how the trait works)
Ultimate (why) explanations: evolutionary history (how and why the trait evolved) and function (why the trait is adaptive and persists across time)
Historical sequence: development and evolutionary history
Slice in time: mechanism and function

26
Q

What is the biological-altruism account for helping/prosocial behaviour?

A
  • Evolutionary reason: prosociality is adaptive, and helps people survive
  • Natural tendency to develop altruistic behaviour
  • Socialisation practices are built on our predisposition for altruismE
27
Q

Evidence for the biological-altruism account

A
  • Children provide instrumental help in absence of cues of need
  • Drive to interact and affiliate with others in the first year
  • Toddlers initiate tasks and enjoy engagement
  • Non-human primates also display altruistic tendencies without socialisation
28
Q

What is the ‘overjustification effect’?

A

If rewarding someone for doing something which is normally intrinsically motivated, the intrinsic motivation is reduced and replaced with that extrinsic motivation.
e.g. from just wanting to help out around the house to wanting to get their allowance from doing chores.

29
Q

What is the social-constructivism account of helping/prosocial behaviour?

A

Socialisation will give rise to prosocial behaviour, shaping it in the process
- Learning through socialisation practices with caregivers at home in first two years

30
Q

Evidence for the social-constructivism account.

A
  • Reciprocal exchanges with caregiver predict socio-emotional development
  • Child and caregiver interactions will shape their socio-emotional cognition as a precursor to prosocial behaviour
  • Emotion-related talk related with toddler’s sharing and helping
31
Q

What are some moral emotions?

A

Guilt, shame, anxiety, disgust, anger, pride, joy, self-satisfaction, admiration, gratitude

32
Q

Why are prosocial emotions benefitial?

A
  • Evolutionary mechanism to ensure survival
  • Awareness of transgressions of social norms, manifesting in emotions
  • Help to maintain, sustain and repair social relationships
  • Bridges between moral cognition, values and moral behaviours
33
Q

What is the moral emotion of guilt?

A

It is the aversive, self-conscious emotion following the realisation that one has harmed another in some way. It causes discomfort that motivates one to make amends or aid the victim to repair the relationship

34
Q

Empirical evidence of guilt in children.

A
  • 2 and 3 year olds
    Procedure:
  • Guilt condition: ball placed by child on the marble run knocks down a tower the experimenter built
  • Sympathy condition: child observes another accidentally cause the harm
  • Control condition: nonharmful context
    Results: by age 3, children showed more physical and verbal
35
Q

Empirical evidence for guilt in toddlers.

A
  • 2 and 3 year olds
    Procedure:
  • 2 conditions: either caused someone accidental harm or watched another adult cause the harm
  • Children could either repair harm by wiping up the spill or watch the adult repair it
  • Measuring pupil dilation, heightened state arousal
    Results:
  • If they repaired the harm, arousal levels decreased. If they watched someone else repair it, their arousal levels remained high