social class inequalities in social mobility Flashcards
how can social mobility be measured?
- intergenerational mobility refers to mobility between generations
- for example a man whose father was a coal minor became a doctor which is upward social mobility - Intragenerational mobility refers to movement between classes by an individual during their working life
- for example a woman might start off as a secretary and end up running the company
what are open societies?
- research into social mobility is useful because it can tell sociologists a lot about the nature of the class structure of a society
- if there is a great deal of social mobility it suggests we are few obstacles to those with talent rising out of their social class
- this is sometimes referred to as a meritocracy
what are closed societies?
- a closed society is one where there is little or no social mobility
- the feudal system that existed in western Europe in the middle ages would be an example of this, as most individuals stayed at the same social rank as their parents
- for example as peasants, knights and lords
what are the problems of researching social mobility?
- research into social mobility has typically placed people into social classes based in their occupations and in the case of intergenerational mobility, the occupations of their parents
- researchers can then study a sample of people to see how many of them have changed their class position and by how much
what are the problems with measuring social mobility?
- classifying occupations
- studying the mobility of women
- studying the mobility of rich and poor
- studying current patterns of social mobility
how is classifying occupations a problem of measuring social mobility?
- as we noted previously, sociologists do not agree on how people should be classified by occupation
- comparing studies is therefore difficult researchers have used different classifications
how is studying the mobility of women a problem of measuring social mobility?
- most older studies of social mobility
- for example the Oxford Mobility Study focused on the mobility of male heads of household only
how is studying the mobility of rich and poor a problem of measuring social mobility?
- the very wealthiest people in society are not usually clearly identified in social mobility studies as they are often identified in social mobility studies as they are often categorised alongside professional and managerial occupations
- arguably these top positions are much more closed than those below them as the wealthy often acquire their positions through inheritance
- similarly, the poorest groups often have no occupations so focusing on the working population may ignore the extent to which they are trapped at the bottom of society
how is studying current patterns o social mobility a problem of measuring social mobility?
- studies of social mobility cannot really draw conclusions about how far people are mobile until they are well established in their careers
- this is not usually until they are in their 40s or 50s
- this means that researchers are often studying the impact on social mobility of government policies on education or change in the labour market that took place 30 or more years ago
what was Goldthropes oxford mobility study (1980)?
- Goldthorpe used the hope-Goldthorpe scale to compare the occupational classes of sons and their fathers
- Goldthrope’s study found that in the period after the second world war there had been considerable upward social mobility, tough much less downward social mobility
- in fact over two-thirds of the service class had started off in either the working class or the service class
- one possible explanation for this was the introduction of free secondary education after 1944 and the expansion of opportunities in higher education
- however, Goldthorpe suggested that this was bit as important as many people believed
- instead he argued that changes in the occupational structure were more significant
- in the mid-20th century there was a reduction in the size of the working class because there were fewer manual jobs and an increase in the size of the intermediate and service classes due to the growth of the service sector
- for example, professionals and administrators in fields such as education, welfare, health ad financial services
- this meant that even if every son of service class parents had obtained a job in the service class some sons of intermediate an working class parents would have needed to be recruited to fill the growing number of service class occupations
what doe Goldthropes research say about absolute social mobility?s
- Goldthrope’s research points to an increase in absolute social mobility
- in other words an increase in the number of man who ended up in different class positions to their fathers mainly because there was more room at the top of society
- however when we compare relative mobility rates, based on the chances of different social classes achieving upward mobility, little changed during the period studied by the OMS
what are the evaluation points of the OMS?
\+supported by BES \+supported by Marshall (1988) -criticised by Saunders (1990) -criticised by Saunders (1996) -criticised by stanworth (1984) -criticised by Abbott (1990) -Marxists
how is the fact that OMS is supported by BSE a strength?
- Goldthrope’s findings were largely confirmed by later studies
- he carried out a follow up study using 1933 British election survey data which confirmed the continuing expansion of the service class, creating more opportunities for absolute mobility
- however, relative mobility remained about the same
how is the fact that OMS is supported by Marshall (1988) a strength?
-another study by Marshall for the Essex university mobility study also found evidence of inequality in relative mobility rates with someone starting off in the service class having seven times as much chance of ending up in the service class as someone from a working class background
how is the fact that Saunders (1990) criticises the OMS a weakness?
- Saunders argues that we should focus on absolute rather than relative mobility rates
- he argues that the increasing number of working class children who do well in education and go on to service class jobs should be celebrated
- in common with the new right thinkers, Saunders argued that Goldthropes arguments have a left wing bias, presenting Britain as a class ridden closed society, rather than highlighting the opportunities presented by capitalism for everyone to achieve