Social Class And Educational Achievement Flashcards
Social class differences: External Factors
Cultural Deprivation - Language
Bernstein - Speech codes
He identified two types of speech codes Restricted codes (used by w/c) They have limited vocabulary, short unfinished sentences,monosyllabic words, context bound, grammatically simple sentences Elaborate codes (used by m/c) They have a wide range of vocabulary, longer grammatically complex sentences, polysyllabic words, context-free, abstract ideas can be communicated
Differences in speech codes give m/c students an advantage as..
Can understand textbooks and educational resources easily
Can express their ideas in a ‘correct’ written manner in an exams
Can understand the words spoken by m/c teachers
M/c children hear elaborate code from parents so feel ‘at home’ in the classroom
What did Hubbs-Tait find about language?
Found parents used language to challenge children to evaluate their own understanding ,their cognitive theory improved
What did Bereiter and Engelmann find about language?
Found w/c families often communicated with gestures or single words and disjointed sentences
Evaluation of Bernstein
Many members of m/c don’t speak fluently and have varying degrees of the elaborate code; its over generalised to say that all members of w/c or m/c speak in particular ways
Labov argued the w/c language system wasn’t inferior, the speech was more direct and to the point and didn’t contain unnecessary detail
Cultural deprivation: Parenting
Douglas
Found w/c parents placed less value on education and didn’t have high expectations for their children in gaining qualifications
W/c parents wouldn’t give their encouragement, visiting school less for evenings/events or talk about child’s progress
Their child therefore didn’t value school as highly as m/c children who were encouraged more by their parents
Cultural deprivation: Parenting
Feinstein
Believed parents own education is the most important factor influencing achievement as more advantaged in how they socialise children
Feinstein pt 2
Found the m/c parents were..
More consistent in their discipline
Encouraging active learning and exploration
More likely to spend time w/child + read to them
Better in their relationships w/schools
More likely to take child on educational activities
More likely to purchase educational toys/books
Better able to support their child’s educational progress through helping them read and write
Parents from w/c backgrounds were more likely to be opposite to those above
Cultural deprivation: Subculture
Sugarman and w/c
Time orientation: Present time orientation (focus is upon here and now)
Gratification/reward: Immediate reward and satisfaction (e.g. Wages)
Collectivism Vs Individualism: Collective action (success is through standing together)
Attitude to luck: Fatalistic (chances are based on luck)
Cultural deprivation: Subculture
Sugarman and m/c
Time orientation: Future time orientation (think ahead and plan for future)
Gratification/reward: Deferred reward (delayed reward and satisfaction e.g. Qualifications)
Collectivism Vs Individualism: Individualistic action (success is through acting individually e.g. Study)
Attitudes to luck: Make your own luck and chances in life
He argues children internalise these values + goals depending their social class which can lead them to succeed/fail at school
Compensatory Education Policies
These have been implemented to try to tackle the problem of cultural deprivation in deprived areas and schools
E.g. Operation Head Start, Sesame Street and Education Action Zones
What is Material Deprivation?
Refers to the lack of basic necessities such as an adequate diet, housing, clothing and money to buy things
Poverty is often linked to educational underachievement
Material deprivation info/statistics
In 2012, only 1/3 students eligible for free school meals achieved 5 A*-C GCSE grades compared to 2/3 who weren’t entitled to the meals
Around 90% of ‘failing’ schools are in deprived areas
Children from poorer homes are more likely to truant and be excluded from schools
-> 1/3 students who persistently truant leave school with no qualifications
Material deprivation
Smith and Noble - list ‘barriers to learning’
Students who can’t afford school uniforms, trips, transport to and from are often bullied and made to feel isolated by peers - so they won’t attend school
Families are unable to afford to send their child to private schools or pay for additional tuition
Families unable to purchase/rent homes in areas w/desirable schools as they can’t afford the costs
Older students from deprived families are likely to have part-time job or care for young so less focus on school
Low income families unlikely to have access to internet and house being poorly heated - illness
What does Cultural Capital mean?
Refers to the tasks, language, values and knowledge of the middle classes