Social approaches Flashcards
Community prevention - Summer splash schemes
Loxley et al 2002
£2 million government scheme for 13-17 year olds in deprived areas
105 schemes
summer is an increased time of youth offending
Summer splash schemes - findings and recommendations
Findings
- targeted young people but not those at risk of offending
- youth crime does not increase dramatically over summer
- 2 out of 3 studied schemes had no impact on crime in the area
Recommendations
- schemes can have a significant impact in areas where there was little existing provision
- ask participants which activities they would like to do
Head Start USA
- encourages role of parents as their child’s first and most important teachers - positive relationships, connections to the community
- health nutrition and social services
Ashford 2007
early intervention is the best for successful intervention but it is under-invested
Broken Windows Theory
Wilson and Kelling 1982
- crime escalates as the result of the perception of a broken community
- if a window is broken and left unrepaired, other windows in the building will get broken and it is a sign that no one cares
- there is a need to reassert community’s dominant force - community cohesion and police involvement
Social Control Theory
Hirschi 1969
- people commit crime when social bonds and commitment to rules break down
- social bonds can be re-established if people engage through jobs and family
- reflected by the fact that most young offenders their offending decreases as they approach adulthood
Community crime prevention
norms and attitudes of communities
focus on social influences - family, friends etc
Developmental prevention
early intervention - pre-school, transition from primary to secondary and school to work
family and child-centred interventions - prevents delinquency
Crawford and Evans 2012
social crime prevention centres on interventions that seek to affect and target social processes
Troubled family programme
introduced after 2011 riots
targeted troubled families most at risk
believed that if educational attainment increased then offending would decrease
youth offending decreased by 33%
Evaluation of social approaches
stigmatisation - targeting those at risk
universal vs targeted
make sure schemes are in areas where there are little schemes already to make a larger impact
ignores how we can change the environment to reduce opportunities for crime