SOCI Final (2nd half of class) Flashcards
Social Stratification (SS)
How a society ranks categories of people into a hierarchy
How does SS affect peoples life chances (1)
Access to important resources (food, shelter, education, employment)
It takes about 2 generations for a low-income family to reach the average income of OECD nations
False
- its takes about 4-5 generations
Principle features of SS (3)
- Persists over generations
- It’s universal but variable
- the amount, type, definition, practice of and reason for inequality varies from society to society - SS involves inequality & beliefs
Social Mobility
Change in position within social hierarchy
Social mobility is only used when referring to some one’s social status being elevated
False
- it can refer to up, down and horizontal movement in a hierarchy
Only industrialized socities show signs of stratification
False
- all socities and groups are stratified
Ethnicity is a fully ascribed trait
False
- its not totally fixed, depends on where ur born
Talent can be either an ascribed or achieved trait
True
Characteristics of an open Society (3)
- Meritocracy (if you work hard enough you can move up)
- but still a mix of ascribed and achieved traits - Stratification based on work type prestige
- Blurring the lines of class distinction (particularly middle class)
Why did meritocracy develop as a result of industrialization?
industrial societies need to develop broad range of abilities and knowledge (specialization - people choosing what they want to contribute) - no set roles (a job will be performed by those who are best for it)
Why is meritocracy a slay (2)
- People have greater independence and choice over their lives (career, spouse etc)
- It promotes productivity and efficiency (working hard to achieve what you want)
Why would a pure meritocracy be a no slay (4)
- Ongoing social mobility would blur social categories
- Dissociating of social groups
- If there was no competition/concept of winners/losers and its accompanying rewards/consequences, highly specialized professions like surgery would be chaos
- Industrial societies esp need to keep some element of caste to maintain order and social unity
d
Industrialized societies rely more on prestige (in work types) than other societies
True
- Industrialized societies are meritocratic so status is partly based on your effort and talent
Why is stratified society a good thing for society? (3)
- Incentivises us to do things (to be rewarded)
- Upholds meaning + order
- Competition (winners + losers)
The greater possibility of social mobility means greater probability as well
false
Davis-Moore Thesis (Functionalist analysis of SS)
Social stratification has beneficial consequences for the operation of a society
Karl Marx on SS
Says SS is problematic
Goes off on capitalism as per usual
- Capitalist society reproduces the class structure in each new generation
- Capitalism makes owners richer
Characteristics of a Closed society/Caste System (4)
- Stratification based on ascribed traits
- Wastes human potential - individualism not present
- Stratification based on cultural beliefs (ie. India’s based on Hindu moral duties)
- Demands endogamous marriage
- keeping people with their “own kind” - Pretty much impossible to move up or down class ladder
Caste systems are unstable and messy structures
False
- they are stable and orderly
Why are caste/closed society systems found in agrarian societies? (3)
- Agriculture demands lifelong routine of hard work (discipline and willingness to keep same jobs as parents)
- People in rural areas have less choices for work and spouses
- Farming is open to everyone (don’t need to be highly skilled/trained)
India’s caste system is still practiced, but only in rural areas
True
- outlawed formally 70 years ago
4 major castes in India
Each have hundreds of jatis/sub caste groups
1. Brahmin
2. Kshatriya
3. Vaishya
4. Sudra
Name of South African caste
Apartheid
- racial separation instituded by whites
Apartheid legacy (3)
In South Africa:
1. 1/7 people live on less than $2/day
2. 30% unemployment rate for adults
3. Economy still dominated by whites
How does ascription shape peoples lives (4)
- Generations of a family in a particular caste will do the same work
- Marriage partners are determined by the respective families
- Everyday life is structured such that there is no ‘mixing’ (stay on rung)
- Legitimacy is founded on deep cultural norms/beliefs (ideology)
Caste system definition
Social stratification based on ascription/birth
Class system definition
Social stratification based on both birth and individual achievement
The richest 20% of the global population has 95% of global income
false
- Richest 20% of global population have 67% of global income
Poorest 20% have 2% of global income
true
Why is the first, second, third world labelling system not useful today? (2)
- it was product of cold war politics
- Capitalist west (first world) vs socialist east (second) & third on sidelines
- Now Distinctive 2nd world doesn’t exist
- it lumps more than 100 countries into “third world”
What is a better way to group countries together (that isn’t 1st, 2nd, 3rd world terminology)? Why?
Talk about countries in terms of income
- High income countries
- Middle-income countries
- Low-income countries
- This system focusses on economic development (more relevant today) rather than political structure
High income countries
nations with highest overall standards of living
Middle-income countries
nations with about average standard of living
Low-income countries
nations with a low standard of living, most are poor
Nations where industrial revolution have more than 2 centuries ago are generally less productive now because of how much time has lapsed since.
False
- Nations where industrial revolution happened >2 centuries ago, productivity went 100x
- ie. Japan: more economically productive than entire African continent S of Sahara
Poor in NA are generally economically better off than half the world
true
Middle-income countries make up most of the land in the world
False
- High-income countries make up the largest % of land in the world
Low income countries make up most of the worlds population
False
- Middle income countries make up the largest % of the worlds population
Note: high population density in low income countries
Why are rich nations so productive? (2)
- Advanced technology
- Control of the global economy
Many of todays middle-income countries’ economies are socialist
False
- many used to have socialist economies
- now more are free-market systems (capitalism)
Most low-income countries are agrarian with some industry
True
Though it is invisibilised, poverty is more severe in rich countries
false
- poverty more severe in poor countries
Canadians have the highest quality of life (based on income, education, longevity)
False - this title belongs to Norwegians
1/10 children in low income countries don’t make it to age 5
True ;(
Poverty is greatest in Sub sahara
True
All 12 nations with the highest rates of infant mortality are in Asia
False
- in Africa
Children in Poverty (4)
- High disease risk
- High pregnancy risk (for girls)
- High violence risk
- Miss out on school (have to provide income for family)
Males under the age of 12 make up the majority of sweatshop workers
False
- Women make up majority of sweatshop workers
Women in poverty (2)
- Tradition makes women responsible for child rearing
- No reproductive health care
- high birth rates which limits economic production of country
Gender inequality is greater in low-income countries
true
Older, single men more susceptible to poverty
False
- Older, single women are more susceptible to poverty
Only a few thousand people globally experience a form of slavery today
False
- roughly 20 million people live in slavery conditions
Descent based slavery
Owner owns slave and offspring, generally involves the enslavement of people of one ethnic group
Forced-labour slavery
imposed by state (ie. criminal violations),
- China if ur a prostitute
Leasing of convicts for work is cheaper than descent-based slavery
True
Child slavery
poor families send kids out to beg, steal or work in production
Debt bondage slavery
Ie. sweatshops
workers given wages is less than that of their food & housing prices
- always in debt, can’t repay
Marriage slavery
women married off against will, slave for husband family, sex work
Human trafficking
promise of a job but instead forced to become prostitutes or perform farm labour
Trading people (human trafficking) is one of the greatest profits to organized crime
True
Explanations of Global Poverty (5)
- Lack of technology: economic production
- Population growth: birth rates
- Social Stratification: wealth distribution
- Gender Inequality: women raise lotta kids
- Global power relationships
Africa population projected to double every 25 years
true
A societies living standards depends heavily on women’s social standing
True
- If women aren’t given opportunties to work they will be forced to stay at home (why not have a lot of kids)
- greater population = slower economic development
Colonialism
nation enriched by political/economical control of other nations
Neocolonialism
economic exploitation by multinational corporations (large business operating in many countries)
Examples of neocolonialism (2)
- Owners impose will on countries they do business with to create favourable economic conditions for their operation
- Buying property in poor nations (ie. China’s “friendship farms” in Africa)
3 statuses in Aristocratic England
- First Estate
- Second Estate
- Third Estate
First Estate in Aristocratic England
Highest church officials
- lived in palaces
- power to shape politics
Second Estate in Aristocratic England
Royalty/hereditary nobility
- No occupations (just rode horses, learned war, art, music, literature stuff)
Gendered stuff in Aristocratic england
Second Estate (3)
- All property passed to oldest son/male relation
- Younger sons would become leaders in church (tying the two together), military officers, judges
- Women depended on marrying well for her security
Law of primogeniture
Pertaining to Second estate in Aristocractic England
- all property passed to oldest son/male relation
Third Estate in Aristocratic England
Commoners
- worked land of those in 1st and 2nd estate
- little schooling, largely illiterate
How did industrialization help those in third estate aristocratic england slay (2)
- Rise of the class system/meritocracy (blurring of differences between aristocrats and commoners)
- schooling expansion, legal rights
- All this empowered some to make enough to challenge nobility
Why are the british sometimes referred to as “a single people divided by a common language”
The importance attached to linguistic accents
- “the King’s English vs sepaking “like commoners”
Can any society be truly classless?
Nope
Russian revolution effects on class
- Transferred productive property from private ownership to state control (gave greater economic equality)
Boasted of being a “classless society” (but nope)
- In a single generation, USSR became industrial, with near elimination of homelessness and unemployment & provision of free education and health care
4 categories of Russia’s class
- High government officials (Apparatchiks)
- political power concentrated here - Soviet intelligentsia
- lower government, professors, scientists - Manual workers
- Rural peasantry
Gorbachez’s suggestions of restructuring (perestroika) Russian federation
- He saw that living standards lagged behind other industrial nations
- Reduce centralization economical control to generate economic growth
- Led to a reformation of people blaming poverty on communist ruling class
Results of perestroika (Russian reformation in 1980s) to Russian society
- Toppled socialist government in 1989
- Soviet Union collapsed in 1991
- something similar to great depression because of so much structural social mobility - Increased poverty and decreased lifespan
Social mobility in “classless” societies (ie. Russia)
A lot of upward social mobility (USSR in 20th century)
- expanding industry drawing peasants out of rural areas into factories
Structural social mobility
a shift in the social position of large numbers of people due more to changes in society itself than to individual efforts
- ie. as a result of industrialization
4 categories of China’s society
- political elite (who rule country)
- Managers and skilled professionals
- Industrial workers
- Rural peasants
Overall, China’s population has experienced structural downward mobility over the past 4 decades
False
- In general China’s population has experienced structural upward mobility by 10%/year with economic expansion over 4 decades
Hai gui
China’s society:
- “returned from overseas” increasing in # as many return from international educations
Economic/income ineuqality in China is decreasing
False
- China has seen an Increase in economic inequality (more and more business and political elite members become mill/billionaires)
Current Communist party leader of China Xi Jingping declares all work to be equally important
False
- It was Parter leader Mao Zedong (in the 20th century) who declared all work to be equally important (no official social classes, but ofc social differences remained)
Social hierarchies are maintained by ideology
True
- maintained by cultural beliefs that justify social arrangements
Belief is ideological if it supports inequality by defining it as fair
True
- ie. rich = smart, poor = lazy
Plato on ideology
every culture considers some type of inequality fair
Marx on ideology
more critical than Plato
1. blames capitalism for defending wealth/power in hands of the few & allows money to stay in families
2. Culture and institutions support society’s elite and consequently, hierarchies
Caste systems are associated with capitalist & industrial societies because hierarchy and organization is needed to maintain structure
False
- Meritocracy & class systems are associated with industrial/capitalist societies
- they rely on specialization and competition based on skill/merit for all the new jobs
Caste systems are typical of agrarian societies
tru dat
Compare and contrast how poor are treated in Industrial vs Feudalist societies
given charity under feudalism & looked down on as undeserving in industrial societies
Herbert Spencer (2)
- Coined “the survival of the fittest” (from darwinism)
- Incorrectly applied this to society (which doesn’t follow biological principles) - opposed social welfare (penalized “best” through taxes, reward “worst”)
Structural Functional Theory of Inequality (person(s))
Davis & Moore
Social Conflict theory of inequality (person(s))
Marx and lil Weber
Structural Functional Theory of Inequality (Davis & Moore)
- Social stratification has beneficial consequences for society’s operation
- Stratification exists to show that crucial positions must be offered enough rewards to draw talented people away from less important work
- unequal rewards benefit society as a whole (encourages productivity & efficiency)
- Equality says that a job poorly and well done should be rewarded equally
What does Tumin argue against Davis & Moore’s functionalist theory of social inequality?
this theory can ignore how caste element of social stratification can prevent development of individual talent
Social Conflict Theory (Marx & a lil bit of Weber)
- Social stratification benefits some and disadvantages other
- Marx → Social stratification is rooted in people’s relation to means of production
Owners (capitalists/bourgeoisie) and workers (proletarians)
What was Marx’s prediction about the end of capitalism
- capitalism destroy itself (working majority to overthrow capitalists)
- Proposed a socialist system (meet needs of
all) - Capitalism produces alienation
Why was there no marxist revolution? (as he predicted) (4)
- Fragmentation of capitalist class (millions of stockholders rather than single families own companies)
- Higher standard of living (higher income, less hours)
- More worker organizations (unions, strikes rights)
- Greater legal projections (safety/financial security)
This century sees a greater percentage of white collar workers (compared to blue collar workers in last century)
true
This century sees a greater percentage of white collar workers (compared to blue collar workers in last century)
true
Wealth is quite evenly distributed in Canada
False - it remains highly concentrated
There are now lower rates of unemployment, downsizing, budgets cutting & job benefits in Canada
false
Marx’s class model
Stratification is about economy
1. Owners (capitalists/bourgeoisie)
2. workers (proletarians)
Weber’s 3 dimensions of inequality (multidimensional)
Stratification is about culture
- Economic position (class) - how much $$ you make
- agrarian societies
- Social prestige (status) - respect
- economic class in industrial/capitalist societies
- Power (party) - ability to achieve goals despite
- bureaucratic/socialist societies
Marx’s thoughts on socialism
abolish capitalism to eliminate social stratification, replace with socialism
Webers thoughts on socialism
socialism’s expanding government & concentration of power would increase inequality
Marx & weber treat social stratification as a micro-level issue
false
- they look at it from a macro perspective
People tend to live/socialize with similar people (because of SS)
True
Symbolic interaction theory of social inequality
- Conspicuous consumption
- we size people up by looking for clues to their social standing
Conspicuous consumption
consuming product b/c of its attachment to social position
→ showing off status through buying things
Thorsten Veblen
Associated with conspicuous consumption
The Jazz age (1920s)
- beginning of consumerism ig
- quantity is the best
- Challenges concept of authenticity - we can change things so fast so what is real? (anomie)
Consumerism is independent of pop culture
False
- Consumerism has always been at the centre of pop culture
Pop culture as a political space (for good and bad)
Focus on on youth as consumers (up to age 25)
- concern comes b/c people are scared what’s
happening to youth
Infused with gender & race
-Fear in 1920s was esp about how women were
dressing
Hunting and gathering societies
no categories better off
Simple technology, produce for needs, survival based on sharing
teach us ties to the natural environment
Horticultural, Pastoral & Agrarian Societies
Social inequality increases as technological advances create a surplus in work
Small elite (godlike) control most of surplus, agriculture more productive
Social inequality greatest in Horticultural, Pastoral & Agrarian Societies
true
Gerhard Lenski on Horticultural, Pastoral & Agrarian societies
advancing technology initially increases SS
Marxist revolutions occurred in Industrial Societies as he predicted
false they happened in agrarian societies
Industrial Societies
Inequality moves downward
- meritocracy weakens elite power, wealth less concentrated
- Higher living standard, specialized work reduces illiteracy
- women voicing political views
Income inequality today is similar to that of….
1920
- 1990 was a slay though
Post-industrial Societies
Upturn in economic inequality
Kuznets Curve (Simon Kuznets)
Trend of how technological advances first increase but then moderate intensity of SS
-Agrarian societies function better with greater inequality
- Industrial societies function better in a more equal system
There is more income inequality in nations where a larger share of the labour force is farming
true
- less in High-income, post industrial nations
Criticism of Kuznets Curve
Canada shows increase in economic inequality suggesting the curve may need revision
Income inequality reflects society’s political & economic priorities
true
Canada had a rigid distinct ranking caste system once in history
false
- don’t forget the racism though
canada is still highly stratified
- rich get the best of it all, millions in poverty
- Many think of Canada as “middle-class” where people are more or less alike
Canada had a rigid distinct ranking caste system once in history
false
- don’t forget the racism though
canada is still highly stratified
- rich get the best of it all, millions in poverty
- Many think of Canada as “middle-class” where people are more or less alike
Income
earnings from work/investments
Wealth
total value of money, mutual funds & assets minus debts
How does wealth concentration weaken democracy
Democracy becomes a system that serves interests of the super rich
- Those who control much of the wealth also control/shape the society’s agenda
Occupational Prestige varies from time to time and varies within high income nations
False
- its Constant in high-income nations and over time
High ranking jobs are dominated by men
true
lower-ranking jobs are dominated by racial minorities
true
What is occupational prestige based on? (3)
income
level of training
skill/ability
60% of degree holders are women
true
visible minorities & immigrants tend to have higher level of education
true
- but still income disparity
there are more single-parent families among Indigenous peoples
true
There is high status consistency in Canada
false
- position may change over lifetime (blurry middle class)
Capitalists in Canada
owners of production means
- Business owners, top officials (historically white)
Source of income (primarily inherited) - stock/bond shares, real estate
Upper uppers (old upper class/blue bloods/society)
Queen Elizabeth
- Practically always because of birth (old money), live in exclusive neighborhoods
- Women work charities, help larger community, broadens elite power & network
- make up smallest portion of canadian pop
HNWI
high net worth individuals
ie. queen lizzy
Lower uppers (new upper class/working rich)
JK Rowling
Some of the richest in the world
Earn money not inheriting it
Can’t enter associations of “old money” families
Middle Class
Largest portion of Canada
- influence on culture
- highly represented in media (average consumers)
- Build up small wealth over working lives (house/retirement account)
What class in Canada are More seeking post-secondary credentials in?
Middle class
Upper middle class
you bitch
Upper-middles (fairly nice houses, multiple cars, build investments)
High prestige occupations
Children attend university
Influence local political affairs
Average middle class
Less prestigious white-collar jobs or highly skilled blue collar jobs
Working class
- blue collar workers are Marx’s industrial proletariat
- Little to no wealth, vulnerable to financial problems (unemployment & illness)
- Little personal satisfaction in discipline not imagination/independence centred jobs
- Precarious employment
From highest to lowest percentage of Canadians name the classes
Middle class, working class, lower class, lower-upper, upper-upper
Precarious employment
few benefits like medical insurance and pension plans
- Jobs not guaranteed to be kept long term
- Most people are going to have 4-5 careers
Lower Class
- low income
- insecure & difficult lives
- Working poor → Low prestige jobs with little satisfaction and income
- Segregated (esp racial & ethnic minorities) by Canadian society
The higher the social standing the less confidence you have because of the pressure on you
false
more confidence (others see them as having more importance)
Old rich values
- strong sense of family history (position based on inherited money)
- Don’t need to prove who they are - understated manners & tastes
New rich values
engage in conspicuous consumption
Why is the working class more socially conservative?
grew up in greater supervision & discipline
- they are economically conservative
Why is the upper class more socially liberal?
Affluent with greater education & financial security
Why is the upper class more economically conservative
to protect wealth
Lower class are more involved in politics (voting, joining political organizations)
false
- well off are like this
Compare and contrast children of working vs upper class
Working class
- conform to norms, respect authority, boundaries
- work in jobs requiring them to follow rules
High income
- flexible, develop individuality
Friendships in working class vs upper
Working class - friendships as sources of material assistance
Higher incomes - friendships involved shared interest & leisure pursuits
Marriage in working vs upper class
Working class couples → traditional gender roles
Middle class → egalitarian with greater intimacy
Social mobility has to do with individual change
false
Social mobility more to do with changes in society
- ie. industrialization: expanding of economy, higher living standards
- outsourcing of jobs (factories close) = downward structural social mobility
Examples of experiencing upward social mobility
getting a PSI degree, high paying job, marrying rich
Examples of experiencing downward social mobility
dropping out, losing job, becoming divorced (esp for women)
Examples of experiencing downward social mobility
dropping out, losing job, becoming divorced (esp for women)
Keister study of social mobility
jaz
those at the bottom are most likely to experience no social mobility (keister study)
true
- Largest % of people who “stayed put” were at either extreme
there is more pronounced mobility in middle ranges of income (keister study)
true
Men are more likely to have same work type as dad
true
Compared to Canada, Australia and Nordic countries, where is social mobility lower?
UK, US, France, S. Europe
Horizontal social mobility
changing jobs at same class level
It is the exception that will experience social mobility compared to their parents
false
- 80% of kids show some type of social mobility in relation to their parents
Social mobility is high in a single generation
false
within a single generation, social mobility is usually small (not large interclass mvmt)
Long-term and short-term trend of social mobility
Long-term trend in social mobility has been upward (but shows signs of ending)
Short-term trend (since ‘07) in social mobility has been downward (middle class shrink)
Real minimum wage has been virtually unchanged since 70s
true - staleld earnings
Expanding global economy has increased income for all
false
- More jobs now offer little income
- less high paying factory jobs & more service jobs
- Increase of low-paying jobs brought downward mobility for middle
Expanding global economy has increased income for all
false
- has increased increased and upward social mobility for educated people
- More jobs now offer little income
- less high paying factory jobs & more service jobs (pays less)
- Increase of low-paying jobs brought downward mobility for middle
Median Canadian family income has increased for all
true
- but gap has gotten bigger b/w top & bottom
There is less industry in Canada
true
we are consumers of technology made in ie. Asia
Relative poverty
- deprivation of resources that is life harming
- invisible
Absolute poverty
lack of resources that is life-threatening (750 million globally)
How does Canada measure poverty rate
LICO (Low-income Cut-off): family spends over 60% of after-tax income on necessities
LIM (Low-Income Measure): 50% of national median income
MBM (Market Basket Measure): cost of things to maintain physical health
Who is more at risk of poverty?
elderly, woman, single parent family, visible minority, Indigenous
Visible minorities make up the majority of Canadians people in poverty
false
majority is white, but visible minorities have higher odds (in relation to population)
- Highest rates of poverty for children are on-reserve kids in Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Order of visible minorities in poverty (most to less)
Arab Canadians, Korean Canadians, Indigenous peoples
Feminization of poverty
more households headed by single women
- more likely to be in poverty if single parent and womand
- more women living in poverty (of all ages)
Poverty is higher in rural areas than urban
false
- Poverty higher in urban than rural (more hidden & no infrastructures to service poor in rural areas)
“New Homeless”
people thrown out of work, escaping domestic violence, rent increases
Liberal thoughts on welfare
its a bandaid approach
- Amounts spent on welfare are nothing compared to tax write offs for RRSPs
- left want to improve and expand social assistance
Conservative thoughts on welfare
- makes country broke
- Worsened poverty: Eroded traditional family
- doesn’t help non-working women make transition to self-sufficiency, encourages out-of-wedlock births
- Government assistance undermines self-reliance
- welfare should be redesigned into work-for-welfare programs
People in poverty thoughts on welfare
its degrading and confusing
Is the Canadian dream rlly a thing
Canadian dream - make the effort, economic security, improve social standing
No
- there is more income inequality
- the myth of if you work hard you can get ahead
More and more Canadians are identifying as middle class
false
- less are
Marx says that capitalist society reproduces ________ in each new generation
Class structure (you are owner or worker)
There is a trend of more courses for less money in public uni
False
Less for more
Higher tuition, fewer courses
Political party
- macro-structure demanding change be made
- Weber recognized that mass change happens when people collect and form political parties
Who’s classifications of stratification influence our national census questions?
Weber (dimensions of class, status and power)
- how much do you make, what is your job
Socioeconomic status
- A profile based on various dimensions of social inequality (income, education, occupational prestige)
- A set of cultural beliefs we’ve been socialized with
Contradictory class locations
Contradiction is that you have lots of skills + income but you aren’t the owner
- most of middle class occupies this
Erik Olin Wright
Contradictory class locations
Classism
A belief that those in higher classes are inherently superior (values, behavior, lifestyle)
Intergenerational Mobility
- Mobility of a family’s children and grandchildren
- Kids will generally do better than their parents - Status anxiety
- Will I do as well as my parents
Intragenerational mobility
Mobility of people in their lifetime
- Ie. if you’re gen z - how are you doing relative to other gen z’s
Why is the middle class shrinking
- its invisible (blurred)
- increasingly going into debt
- same amount of money for smaller portions
- We’re being resocialized to learn what middle class is
How are we being resocialized to learn what middle class is:
Old vs Modern
- Wanting to buy a house vs condo/renting
- Having 2 cars vs biking, transiting
- Privacy vs work/leisure blending
Pierre Bourdieu
- Book: “Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste” (1979)
- Interested in taste (food, movies, literature)
- We can tell social classes based on what we see
Pierre Bourdieu on taste
- A practice that gives people a sense of their place in the social world/order
- Humour, food, friends, leisure activities, what we’re comfortable saying, neighbourhoods, social media
- Middle class people going to middle class restaurants because it feels more “them”
All types of capital are intimately related to one another and are represented symbolically
true
read it again marie i know you skipped it
Economic capital
Financial resources
Marx
Cultural capital
Strategies of thinking, ways of speaking
Social capital
Your network: Knowing the right people (who will help you get various opportunities)
Social capital
Your network: Knowing the right people (who will help you get various opportunities)
Symbolic capital
Credentialism
Stuff (material objects)
- What you wear
- Where you live
-Where you go to school
Attributional symbols
Symbols that represents capital we actually possess (Bsc, UBC)
Aspirational symbols
Using symbols that represent what we hope to achieve/become (UBC 2026)
- Knock off brands