Smart PLS Flashcards

1
Q

Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)

A

a family of statistical models that seek to explain the relationships among multiple variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What can SEM be used for?

A

regression analysis, path analysis and factor analysis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Research goals:
CB-SEM
PLS-SEM

A

Parameter-oriented
Prediction-oriented

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Method:
CB-SEM
PLS-SEM

A

Covariance-based
Variance-based

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Data assumption:
CB-SEM
PLS-SEM

A

Normal distribution
None

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Good reasons to use PLS-SEM

A
  • Estimation of complex models
  • Integration of formatively measured constructs
  • Working with small sample sizes
  • Focus is on prediction
  • Focus is on exploring new relationships
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Not so good reasons to use PLS-SEM

A
  • Focus is on exploring new relationships without having a hypothesized model.
  • Working with small sample sizes (when the population is large)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Path model

A

a diagram that connects variables/constructs based on theory and logic to visually display the hypotheses that will be tested.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Correlation

A

linear relationship between two variables
range from -1 to +1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Covariance

A
  • unstandardised form of correlation
  • positive number leads to positive relationship
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Reflective scale

A

changes in the latent variable directly cause changes in the assigned indicators

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Formative scale

A

changes in one or more of the indicators cause changes in the latent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Stage 1:

A

Evaluation of the Measurement Model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Reliability models

A
  • Indicator Reliability (Loading)
  • Composite Reliability (CR) and Cronbach Alpha values
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Indicator Reliability (Loading) and Composite Reliability (CR) and Cronbach Alpha values

A

Each indicator’s loading should be above 0.7

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Convergent Validity

A

Average Variance Extracted (AVE) should be above 0.5, meaning that more than 50% of the variance is explained by the construct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Discriminant Validity

A

Each construct should be distinct from others, often assessed using the Fornell-Larcker criterion or the Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio (HTMT).

18
Q

Fornell-Larcker Criterion:

A

The square root of AVE of each construct should be higher than its highest correlation with any other construct.

19
Q

HTMT:

A

Should be below 0.9 (or 0.85 for stricter threshold).

20
Q

Reliability

A

the consistency or stability of a measurement instrument. A reliable instrument yields the same results under consistent conditions.

21
Q

Internal Consistency:

A

Assesses the consistency of results across items within a test.
- Commonly used metrics:
Cronbach’s Alpha and
Composite Reliability (CR)

22
Q

Indicator reliability

A

the degree to which an individual indicator (or observed variable) consistently and accurately measures the construct it is intended to measure. PLS-SEM= examining the loadings

23
Q

loadings

A

measure of how strongly it correlates with its latent variable.

24
Q

Validity

A

how well a test or measurement tool actually measures what it is intended to measure. It’s about accuracy.
- Convergent and Discriminant Validity

25
Q

Convergent validity

A

how similar they are

26
Q

Covergent Validity uses

A

Average Variance Extracted

27
Q

AVE should be

A

greater than 0.5 = 50% of the variance in the indicators is explained by the construct

28
Q

Discriminant validity

A

how different they are

29
Q

Discriminant validity uses

A

Fornell-Larcker Criterion and HTMT

30
Q

Fornell- Larcker

A

The square root of the AVE for each construct should be higher than its highest correlation with any other construct.

31
Q

HTMT

A

The ratio should be below 0.9 (or 0.85 for stricter criteria).

32
Q

Stage 2:

A

Check to see if there are any multicollinearity issues

33
Q

Inner Collinearity

A

the correlation between the predictor constructs in the structural model.
- Assess for multicollinearity to ensure reliable path coefficient estimates.

34
Q

Variance Inflation Factor (VIF)

A

measures the extent to which the variance of a regression coefficient is inflated due to multicollinearity with other predictors.
-It will show you which item has a problem

35
Q

VIF should be

A

less than 5

36
Q

Predictive relevance (R squared)

A

the proportion of variance in the dependent variables (endogenous constructs) that is explained by the independent variables (exogenous constructs).
- Evaluate how well the model explains and predicts the endogenous variables.

37
Q

Model Fit

A

how well the model reproduces the observed data.
- Measure how well the model reproduces the observed data.

38
Q

Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR)

A

SRMR is a measure of the average discrepancy between the observed and predicted correlations.

39
Q

Significance and Path Coefficients:

A

Path coefficients represent the strength and direction of the relationships between constructs in the structural model.
- Check the statistical significance and practical relevance of the relationships between constructs.

40
Q

Strong path coefficient

A

close to -1 or 1

41
Q
A