Small Groups Test 2 Flashcards
leadership as a process, not a person
leaders and followers are interconnected parts of a system. Leadership is not well understood outside of the social context in which it occurs
leadership
a leader-follower social influence process, directed toward positive change that reflects mutual purposes of group members and it largely accomplished through competent communication
what are the key differences between managing and leading a small group
1) positional versus interpersonal influence
- a leader exercises interpersonal influence persuasively (leader-follower relationship), but a manager exercises positional influence, sometimes coercively (supervisor-subordinate relationship)
2) maintaining versus changing
- leaders work to change the status quo, managers typically maintain it
transformational leadership
leadership often associated with changing the status quo; frequently linked to charisma. Leaders that deal with change, inspiration, motivation and influence
transactional leadership
leadership often associated with management that typically strives to maintain the status quo efficiently
charismatic leadership
all leaders are transformational to some degree, but charismatic leaders are thought to be highly transformational
charisma
a constellation of personal attributes that people find highly attractive in an individual and strongly influential (highly subjective)
list the “thou shalt nots for being a leader
- exhibit a me-orientation
- be uniformed about problems and issues
- manifest sluggish participation
- dominate conversation
- listen poorly
- be rigid and inflexible when expressing viewpoints
- display emotional outbursts
what are the different perspectives on leadership
- traits perspective
- styles perspective
- situational perspective
- distributive or shared perspective
- ethical or servant perspective
- culture and leadership perspective
- communication competence perspective
traits perspective
views leadership as a person, not a process. Leaders are born not made
styles perspective
- autocratic: exerts control over group members (high task, low social)
- democratic: encourages participation and responsibility from group members (high task, high social)
- laissez-faire: a do nothing approach, no trying to
situational or contingency perspective
“it depends” approach
1. telling style (high task, low relationship)
2. selling style (high task, high relationship)
3. participating style (low task, high relationship)
4. delegating style (low task, low relationship)
distributive/ shared perspective
recognizes that “we are all in this together”. Leadership is a process, not a person. Group members step up to certain maintenance or task roles when needed
ethical/ servant perspective
a perspective on leadership that places the emphasis on the needs of followers and helps them to become more knowledgeable, “moral leader”
culture perspective
no universal theory. most leadership theories are distinctly American. Americans, Arabs, Asians, British, French, Latin American and Russian tend to idealize strong leaders. Switzerland, the Netherlands and Scandinavia are generally more skeptical of strong leaders and fear their abusive power. Participative leadership style preferred in western cultures is questionable and effective in eastern cultures. Directive leadership is strongly favored in most middle eastern cultures
communication competence perspective
extraordinary leadership is the product of extraordinary communication
virtuous cycle
the more respect shown to those with power in the group the more the lower power members typically become engaged and motivated to improve and provide creative solutions to problems (communication competence perspective)
4 principal distinctions between small groups and teams
- level of cooperation (the working together imperative)
- diversity of skills (look for complementarity)
- group identity (operating as a unit)
- time and resources (commitment to the team)
team slayers
bad attitudes and behavior 1) egocentrism 2) cynicism vs optimism and 3) verbal/ nonverbal abuse
4 Cs of developing team goals
- clear goals (everyone is on the same page)
- cooperative goals (interdependent challenges)
- challenging goals (denting the universe)
- commitment to the goals (a passion to succeed)
team identity
the sense members feel that they are part of a group, that they belong
how does a team manifest an identity?
- symbolic convergence (communicating fantasy themes)
- solidarity symbols (unifying nonverbally)
- team talk (the language of “we”- we, us, let’s do this together)
how do roles develop differently in informal groups compared with teams?
role ambiguity develops with informal groups, causing confusion and duplication when team members are unsure with their roles. Teams usually require a formal designation of roles.
role ambiguity
produces confusion and duplication when team members are unsure of the parts they are expected to play
what are the 4 dimensions of team empowerment?
- group potency: a team’s generalized confidence in its ability to perform across a variety of situations
- meaningfulness: a team’s perception that its tasks are important, valuable and worthwhile
- autonomy: the degree to which team members experience substantial freedom, independence and discretion in their work
- impact: the degree of significance given by those of the team, typically the team’s organization, to the work produced by the teams
what are the 4 impediments of team empowerment
- organizations sabotage their own teams
- not everyone embraces teams
- when participation in decision making is a sham
- when rewards are distributed based on the individual
team
a constellation of members with complementary knowledge and skills who act as an interdependent unit, are equally committed to a common mission, subscribe to a cooperative approach to accomplish that mission and hold themselves accountable for team performance
pseudo teams
those small groups that only half-heartedly exhibits the several criteria included in the team definition
information overload
occurs when the rate of information flow into a system and/ or the complexity of the information exceeds the system’s processing capacity
consequences of information overload
- critical thinking impairment (separating wheat from chaff)
- indecisiveness (conclusion irresolution, faster is the new norm)
- inattention (difficulty concentrating)
- diminished creativity (preoccupation with the mundane)